Predict0r

Prediction markets deep research!
@zscdao active member
Undervalued markets degen!

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

POLYMARKET POTENTIAL FAIR DISTRIBUTION

Most people think the @Polymarket airdrop will be only about trading volume.

I don't think so.

If Polymarket wants to reward real users, the logic should be different:

base eligibility first, multipliers after.

Because volume alone is a weak signal.

A whale can enter one hype market, generate a large amount of volume, and disappear forever.

A smaller but regular user can trade for months, provide liquidity, participate in markets, invite users, sponsor markets, create content, or build tools around the ecosystem.

These are not the same users.

So the main question should not be:

Who traded the most?

The better question is:

Who created the most value for Polymarket?

My speculative framework:

1. Base eligibility

This layer should define whether a wallet is a real user or just a random wallet, bot, or one time farmer.

Possible base criteria:

> Number of trades

A user should have more than 1 - 2 random trades.

Possible base criteria:

10+ trades

This is a simple filter that separates a real trader from someone who only entered one hype event.

> Trading volume

Volume matters because it shows real economic activity.

Possible base criteria:

$1000+ trading volume

But volume should not be the only criterion.

Otherwise, the airdrop becomes too whale heavy.

> Active days / active months

In my opinion, this may be one of the most important criteria.

A wallet active across different months looks much stronger than a wallet that did all its activity in one week.

Possible criteria:

10 active days across 3 different months

This helps separate recurring users from people who only appeared right before the snapshot.

> Redeemed positions

Polymarket could also use redeemed positions as an additional anti bot filter.

Possible criteria:

5+ redeemed positions

But I would not make this too strict.

Because it can punish users who trade long duration markets, exit before resolution or mainly provide liquidity.

As an additional signal maybe.

As a hard requirement it's questionable.

> Average holding time

This could also be an important anti Sybil signal.

A real trader usually holds positions for some period of time.

A farm wallet often creates fast repetitive activity without any real market view.

But again, this should be used carefully.

Active traders and market makers should not be punished just because they manage positions frequently.

2. Multipliers

After base eligibility, Polymarket could measure user value through multipliers.

First, the platform asks:

Are you a real user?

Then:

How valuable were you to the platform?

> Trading volume

Volume shows how much economic activity a user brought to the platform.

Possible tiers:

$1k+ volume - 1x
$10k+ volume - 1.5x
$25k+ volume - 2x
$100k+ volume - 3x

But volume should not dominate the whole model.

Otherwise, regular smaller users lose to one time whales.

> Number of trades
The number of trades shows repeated interaction with the platform.

Possible tiers:

10+ trades - 1x
50+ trades - 1.5x
100+ trades - 2x
500+ trades - 3x

This rewards not only capital size, but also real activity.

> LP rewards

This is probably one of the strongest value signals.

LP make markets better.

They tighten spreads, improve execution, and make Polymarket feel like a real trading venue instead of a set of thin order books.

Possible tiers:
$5 - 10 LP rewards - 1.5x
$10 - 30 LP rewards - 2x
$30+ LP rewards - 3x

I would give LP activity a strong weight.

Because liquidity is not just activity.

It improves the product for everyone.

> Market sponsorship

Sponsorship is an underrated signal.

If a user sponsors markets, they are not only trading.

They are helping specific markets get liquidity and become more active.

Possible tiers:
1 - 3 sponsored markets - 2x
3+ sponsored markets - 3x

This is high value behavior for the ecosystem.

> Referrals

Referrals are an obvious growth signal.

But only real users should count.

A referral that does nothing should not have much weight.

Possible tiers:

1 - 10 real referrals - 1.5x
10 - 50 real referrals - 2x
50+ real referrals - 3x

The key word is real.

No self referrals.
No sybil clusters.
No fake accounts.

Only users who actually trade.

> Fees paid

Fees paid could also be an additional criteria.

But I would not put it at the center of the model or create separate multiplier tiers for it

Because Polymarket goal is probably not just to collect more fees.

Polymarket has bigger goal:
liquidity, retention, real users, better markets, and network effects.

Fees paid can be a useful additional signal.

But not the main criteria.

3. What will probably matter less

> Market diversity

Some people think trading across different market categories will be important.

Maybe.

But I don't think it should be a major factor.

A trader who specializes only in sports, politics, crypto, or macro can still be much more valuable than a casual user who randomly trades everything.

Niche traders often bring more value to the market:

- they understand the topic better,
- they price probabilities more accurately,
- they react to news faster,
- they create better price discovery.

So market diversity can be a small bonus.

But not a core requirement.

> Account profitability

Another criteria people talk about is profitability.

In my opinion, this probably should not be an important criterion for the main airdrop.

Because profit does not always equal value for the platform.

A user can be unprofitable and still:
- trade regularly,
- create volume,
- provide liquidity,
- participate in different markets,
- invite new users,
- make markets more active.

From the platform perspective, this user is still valuable.

A profitable trader, on the other hand, can make a few good trades, take profit, and never come back.

Also, if profitability is heavily rewarded, it creates a strange logic:
the best traders get more tokens,
while ordinary users who also created activity get less.
For a community airdrop, this is not always fair.
Polymarket probably wants to reward not only the users who won the market.

It should reward the users who helped the market exist.

So profitability can be a weak additional signal.

For example, it may help identify real trading behavior.

But I would not make it a main multiplier.

The main signals should still be:
- consistency,
- volume,
- trades,
- liquidity,
- referrals,
- sponsorships,
- ecosystem value.

Profit shows how well a user traded.

But an airdrop should measure something else:

how useful the user was to Polymarket.

4. Separate airdrop for active X accounts

At the same time, I think the social layer is still important.

X accounts that regularly write about Polymarket do a lot of work for the platform.

They:
- explain markets,
- break down resolution rules,
- bring new users,
- create viral moments,
- increase trust in prediction markets,
- make Polymarket part of the public conversation.

This should not necessarily be mixed with the main trader airdrop.

It may be more logical to create a separate social allocation.

Because trading activity and content creation are different types of value.

A trader creates liquidity and volume.

A creator creates attention, education, and distribution.

Both are important.
But the criteria should be different.

For X accounts, possible criteria could include:

> content quality,
> posting consistency,
> reach
> engagement,
> users attracted,
> Polymarket mentions,
> market breakdowns,

But this is a topic for a separate post.

5. Builder airdrop

Another major category is builders.

And I think builders will receive the largest airdrop allocation.

Why?

Because builders do not just create activity.
They create the ecosystem around Polymarket.

This can include:
> analytics platforms,
> trading tools,
> bots,
> dashboards,
> API integrations,
> mobile interfaces,
> research products,
> risk-management tools,
> social products,
> market aggregators.

A regular user trades inside the platform.

A builder expands the platform itself.

Builders can bring new users, increase volume, improve UX, create new use cases, and make Polymarket part of a broader prediction market infrastructure.

From Polymarket perspective, this may be one of the most valuable types of participants.

Because a strong builder ecosystem makes the product less dependent on one interface.

If dozens of apps, analytics tools, and trading products appear around Polymarket, the whole network becomes stronger.

So I would expect a separate allocation for builders.

And it will be huge larger than the standard user airdrop.

The criteria there may be completely different:

> volume routed through the builder,
> active users of the product,
> number of trades through the app,
> real audience,
> retention,
> public contribution to the ecosystem,
whether other traders actually use the product.

And one important point:

builders may receive an allocation not only for themselves.

Part of the airdrop could be distributed to their active users, supporters or early adopters.

That would make sense.

Because good builder products also create mini ecosystems around them.

6. Why this model is fair in my opinion

A good airdrop should probably have two layers:

Layer 1: base allocation

Reward everyone who meets the minimum criteria of a real user.

This protects smaller but real users.

Layer 2: value multipliers

Increase allocation for users who created more value:

This creates a better balance.

Small real users are not ignored.

Large valuable users receive more.

Fake farmers are filtered out.

Builders get separate recognition for ecosystem contribution.

And social accounts can get a separate allocation for distribution and attention.

@PolymarketTrade
@williamlegate
@MatthewModabber
@zscdao

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@saurav_tweets @Polymarket Hope so

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@mmoyshaa Easy strategy, but profitable and this matters!

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@xatacrypt sounds attractive!

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

TRENDING: FIFA WORLD CUP 2026
NATION TO REACH QUARTERFINALS

My YES shortlist:
> England for 58c
> Portugal for 48c
> Netherlands for 39c

This year the tournament structure is different:
> 48 teams
> More knockout games
> Round of 32 before Round of 16
> More bracket volatility.

That changes the tactical plan for every serious team.

Winning the group is now much more important.

A team can be very strong, but if it finishes 2nd, the bracket can become ugly very quickly.

For this market on @Polymarket, I'm looking for teams with:
> strong chance to win the group
> deep squad
> good coach
> favorable Round of 32 path
> manageable Round of 16 path
> enough individual quality to survive one bad game
> low risk of early favorite vs favorite collision

1) England to reach Quarterfinals YES

Why:

England may have one of the cleanest routes to the quarterfinals if they win Group L.

Group L:
> England
> Croatia
> Ghana
> Panama

England are clearly the strongest team in the group.
Squad depth: Kane, Bellingham, Rice, Saka, Rashford, Eze, Watkins, Toney, Stones, Guehi, Reece, Pickford

England have elite players in every line.

That matters a lot in knockout football.

Coach factor:

Thomas Tuchel is built for knockout football.

He is pragmatic.

He can prepare specific game plans.

Hypothetical bracket path:

Scenario A: if England win Group L

This is the best setup.

They likely get a 3rd placed team in the Round of 32.
Then in the Round of 16, their path can open into a much more manageable matchup than most elite teams get.

This is why England are one of the best YES candidates.

They do not need to beat France, Spain or Argentina early.

If England win Group L, their probability of reaching the quarterfinals becomes very strong.

Scenario B: England finish 2nd

This is the risk.

A 2nd place finish can push England into a much harder bracket.

Potentially Colombia, Portugal, Spain or another strong opponent can appear much earlier.

That is why Group L matters so much.

But the base case is England winning the group.

England have the best combination of squad depth, knockout coach and bracket logic.

If they win Group L, YES to reach quarterfinals looks very strong.

2) Portugal to reach Quarterfinals YES

Why:

Portugal are one of the best structural plays in this market.

They have elite squad depth and a very attractive path if they win Group K.

Group K:
> Portugal
> Colombia
> Uzbekistan
> DR Congo

Colombia are dangerous.

But Portugal still have the deeper squad and more ways to win.

Squad depth: Diogo Costa, Ruben Dias, Nuno Mendes, Cancelo, Vitinha, Joao Neves, Bruno Fernandes, Bernardo Silva, Rafael Leao, Pedro Neto, Joao Felix, Goncalo Ramos, Cristiano Ronaldo

This is one of the most complete squads in the tournament.

Portugal can control the ball through Vitinha, Bernardo and Bruno.

They can attack space with Leao and Neto.

They can defend with Dias and Nuno Mendes.

They have multiple forward profiles.

Coach factor:

Roberto Martinez has a lot of tournament experience.

Portugal already have talent.

His job is to balance the system, manage Ronaldo role correctly and avoid making the team too static.

If Portugal get that right, they are very dangerous.

Hypothetical bracket path:

Scenario A: Portugal win Group K

This is the bullish setup.

Portugal can get a 3rd placed team in the Round of 32.

Then the Round of 16 path can be very manageable compared to other top teams.

If Portugal win Group K, they can reach the quarterfinals without needing to beat a France/Spain/Argentina level team early.

Scenario B: Portugal finish 2nd

This is the main danger.

If Colombia take 1st place, Portugal route becomes much worse.

A 2nd place finish can create an early clash with another strong runner up or open a path toward one of the tournament favorites.

So the bet is heavily connected to Portugal winning Group K.

Portugal have one of the best squad + bracket combinations in this market.

If they win the group, their route to the quarterfinals looks very clean.

3) Netherlands to reach Quarterfinals YES

Why:

Netherlands are not the biggest favorite to win the World Cup.

But this market is different.

They only need to reach the quarterfinals.

And if they win Group F, the bracket can become very attractive.

Group F:
> Netherlands
> Japan
> Sweden
> Tunisia

This group is tricky.

Japan are disciplined and technical.

Sweden are physical and dangerous in the air.

But Netherlands have the strongest overall squad.

Squad depth: Van Dijk, Ake, Timber, Van de Ven, Dumfries, Frenkie de Jong, Gravenberch, Reijnders, Koopmeiners, Xavi Simons, Gakpo, Depay, Malen, Weghorst

This is a very good tournament squad.

Strong defence.

Good midfield control.

Physical power.

Netherlands are built to survive knockout football.

They may not always dominate beautifully.

But they can defend, suffer, counter and win tight matches.

Coach factor:

Ronald Koeman is experienced.

He understands Dutch football.

He has tournament experience and knows how to manage a squad with big personalities.

Netherlands are usually dangerous when they have a strong defensive base.

And this team has exactly that.

Hypothetical bracket path:

Scenario A: Netherlands win Group F

This is the whole idea.

If Netherlands win Group F, they likely avoid Brazil in the Round of 32.

Instead, they can get a runner up from Group C.

That could be Morocco or Scotland depending on the group outcome.

Then the Round of 16 path can open into a matchup against a runner up from Group A or Group B.

That could be Mexico, Switzerland, Canada or another non elite team.

This is a very good path for a team like Netherlands.

Scenario B: Netherlands finish 2nd

This is the bad scenario.

If Netherlands finish 2nd, they may run directly into Brazil.

So this play is mostly about Netherlands winning Group F.

Netherlands are one of the best bracket angle teams in this market.

They are not my favorite to win the World Cup.

But they are very live to reach the quarterfinals if they win the group.

That makes Netherlands YES very interesting.

Summary:

The new World Cup format makes group position much more important.

For this market, the best teams are not always the biggest names.

The best setups are teams that can:

> win the group
> avoid early superpower collisions
> get a playable Round of 32
> get a manageable Round of 16
> reach the quarterfinals before the bracket becomes brutal

My YES choises:

England YES for 58c
Best mix of squad depth, Tuchel knockout profile and clean bracket path.

Portugal YES for 48c
Elite squad, strong group winning chance and one of the best routes if they finish 1st.

Netherlands YES for 39c
Best bracket angle play if they win Group F and avoid Brazil early.

@PolymarketTrade
@PolymarketSport

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@se_margl Exactly

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

TRENDING: World Cup - Player to score

My YES shortlist:

This market on @Polymarket is simple but very easy to misprice.

Resolution rules:

The market resolves YES if the listed player scores at least one goal during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Goals in regular time, stoppage time and extra time count.

Own goals and penalty shootout goals do not count.

Important factors for market:
> team attacking ceiling
> expected number of matches
> player role and minutes
> penalty duty
> weak group stage opponents
> chance of one big score game
> whether the player is a starter or rotation piece

Because liquidity is low I build positions with limit orders and wait for fills.

1) Lionel Messi YES

Limit order 65c

Why:

Penalty status:

Messi is Argentina main penalty taker if he is on the pitch.

This is the strongest argument for this option. In a score at least once market, penalty duty is a massive edge.

Role:

Messi is not just a creator for Argentina.

Even at this stage of his career, he still plays as the central attacking brain of the team - free 10, right sided creator, second striker and penalty box connector.

He does not need to run the game for 90 minutes.

He just needs one penalty, one free kick, one cutback, one transition or one moment of individual quality.

Team upside:

Argentina are defending champions and still have one of the strongest tournament structures in the world.

They have a real chance to play 5+ matches.

That matters a lot because Messi does not need to score early. His probability grows with every extra match Argentina play.

Group setup:

Argentina face Algeria, Austria and Jordan.

This is not a completely free group, but Jordan is the key upside match.

If Argentina produce one 3 - 0 or 4 - 0 type game, Messi is one of the first players who can benefit through a penalty, free kick or central attacking involvement.

Main risk:

Age and minutes.

Messi may not play every match for 90 minutes. Argentina can manage him carefully, especially if they qualify early.

Also, Lautaro Martinez and Julian Alvarez will take a lot of central xG.

Summary:

Messi is one of the cleanest YES profiles in the whole market:

main penalty taker, elite team, likely deep run, central role and one soft group game.

The only reason not to pay too high is minutes management.

For me, Messi YES is strong

2) Ousmane Dembele YES

Limit order 50c

Why:

Penalty status:

Dembele is not France main penalty taker.

The main penalty taker should be Mbappe.

This is the biggest reason I do not price Dembele like an elite 70%+ YES.

Role:

Dembele should be one of France main attacking players.

He can play RW, LW or inside forward.

This is important because his current profile is much more direct than before. He is no longer only a assists creator. He now gets into scoring zones, shoots more and can finish moves himself.

Team upside:

France can go very deep.

They are one of the best squads in the tournament, and if they play 5 or 6 matches, Dembele gets multiple chances to cash this market.

Group setup:

France face Senegal, Iraq and Norway.

Senegal and Norway are not easy opponents, but Iraq is the key upside spot.

If France create one 3 - 0 or more type game in the group, Dembele is exactly the type of player who can score from open play.

Summary:

Dembele YES is a good tournament position because France can go deep and he should get real attacking minutes.

But without penalties, I do not want to overpay.

For me, this is a good YES only with patient limit orders around 50c.

3) Christian Pulisic YES

Limit order 30c

Why:

Penalty status:

Pulisic is likely USA main penalty taker.

This is the biggest argument in favor of this option.

In a score at least once market, one penalty can be enough to close the position.

Role:

Pulisic is the face of the US attack.

He can play LW, inside forward or free attacking role.

He is not only a creator. He attacks the box, takes shots and can score from open play, counters, second balls and penalties.

Team context:

USA are hosts.

That matters.

Home crowd, familiar conditions and tournament energy can help them push through the group.

I do not need USA to become a semifinal team for this market.

I just need them to play 4 matches and create enough penalty or open play volume for Pulisic.

Group setup:

USA face Paraguay, Australia and Turkey.

This is not an easy group, but it is playable.

Paraguay can be physical. Australia can defend deep. Turkey can be open.

The Turkey match especially can become a higher event game, which is good for a Pulisic goal.

Main risk:

USA are not France, Argentina or Brazil.

Their attacking ceiling is lower, and they may play some tight, low scoring games.

Also, Balogun and Pepi can take a lot of central xG.

That is why Pulisic is not very confident option for me, but for 30c has good risk/reward.

4) Sadio Mane YES

Limit order 25c

Why:

Penalty status:

Mane should be Senegal main or co main penalty taker if he is on the pitch.

That keeps his YES probability alive even if Senegal do not create huge open play volume.

Role:

Mane is still the biggest attacking name in Senegal squad.

He can play LW, second striker or central attacking role depending on the match.

For this market, that flexibility is useful because he can receive minutes in several tactical setups.

Team path:

Senegal are in a difficult group, but they are strong enough to qualify.

If they finish second or even third and reach the Round of 32, Mane likely gets at least 4 matches to find one goal.

That is enough for a player with penalty upside and attacking freedom.

Group setup:

Senegal face France, Iraq and Norway.

France is a very difficult match.

But Iraq is the key match for this market.

If Senegal dominate territory or get a penalty there, Mane becomes one of the first players I want exposure to.

Norway can also become an open game because both teams have attacking stars and defensive questions.

Summary:

Mane YES is a classic risk/reward spot.

Not the safest option by raw probability, but the profile is good:

team leader, penalty upside, attacking freedom, one playable game against Iraq and possible 4 match path.

Final summary:

I like all four players, but only at the right price.

Messi has the cleanest penalty + deep run profile.

Dembele has the best team path after Messi, but no main penalty duty.

Pulisic has the best role relative to price because of penalties and host nation status.

Mane is the lower price risk/reward play if the market underestimates his leadership role and penalty upside.

The edge is building positions with patient limit orders below fair value.

@PolymarketSport

@PolymarketTrade

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@0xSurferX Good one strategy! Nice results! Grats

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@s1rozha_ Nice philosophy!

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@Atenov_D it's huge! thanks🤝

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@0xLanister Necessarily

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@0xLanister definetely booked it! will research more deep later!

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@monokern @SynthdataCo looks like very usefull tool

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

TRENDING: World Cup: Player to score

My YES shortlist:

This market is simple but very easy to misprice.

Resolution rules:

The market resolves YES if the listed player scores at least one goal during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Goals in regular time, stoppage time and extra time count.

Own goals and penalty shootout goals do not count.

Important factors for market:
> team attacking ceiling
> expected number of matches
> player role and minutes
> penalty duty
> weak group stage opponents
> chance of one big score game
> whether the player is a starter or rotation piece

Because liquidity is weak, I would not chase market prices.
I would only build positions with limit orders and wait for fills.

1) Kai Havertz YES

Limit order 55c

Why:

Penalty status:

likely Germany main or co main penalty taker, with Kimmich as the main alternative. This is a big boost for a score at least once market.

Role:

Havertz is one of the best profiles for this market because he can play as the central striker (false 9). He does not need to dominate the game. He just needs one penalty, one cutback, one header, one rebound.

Team upside:

Germany should have enough quality to reach at least the Round of 32 and more

Group setup:

Germany face Curacao, Ivory Coast and Ecuador. Curacao is the key match here. If Germany produce one 3 - 0 or 4 - 0 type game, Havertz has a very realistic chance to get on the scoresheet.

Summary:

Havertz is one of the cleanest YES profiles in this market: striker role, possible penalties, strong team, soft group game upside and 4+ match potential.

2) Raphinha YES

Limit order 55c

Why:

Penalty status:

Not a locked primary penalty taker if Neymar is on the pitch. But if Neymar is not starting, Raphinha can become one of the realistic alternatives.

Role:

right winger / inside forward. This is important. Raphinha attacks the box, shoots from distance, presses high and can score from transitions.

Team upside:

Brazil can go very deep.

Group setup:

Brazil have Morocco, Haiti and Scotland. The Haiti game is the key upside spot. If Brazil win big in one group match, Raphinha is exactly the type of player who can collect a goal.

Summary:

Raphinha YES is not only about Brazil being strong. It is about his specific role: high volume attacking winger in a team that can create one big score group stage game.

3) Cody Gakpo YES

Limit order 50c

Why:

Penalty status:

probably not the main penalty taker if Memphis Depay is on the pitch. Memphis is the more likely first choice. But Gakpo can still be a backup option depending on lineup and game state.

Role:

Gakpo is one of the best Netherlands profiles for this market because he can play LW, inside forward or even central forward. He naturally arrives in scoring zones.

Team upside:

Netherlands should be strong enough to reach the knockouts. Their ceiling is probably quarterfinal level if the bracket opens.

Group setup:

Japan, Sweden and Tunisia is not an easy group, but it should create competitive games where Netherlands need their main attackers on the pitch

Gakpo has a direct scorer profile. He is not just a dribbler or creator. He attacks the far post, shoots early and is comfortable finishing inside the box.

Summary:

Gakpo YES is a clean starter + scorer profile + likely 4 matches position. The only reason I do not price him higher is penalty uncertainty and a tougher group than Brazil or Germany.

4) Raul Jimenez YES

Limit order 30c

Why:

Penalty status:

likely Mexico main penalty taker if he is on the pitch. This is the entire reason he belongs in this shortlist.

Role:

central striker. For a score one goal market, I prefer a true 9 with penalties over a more talented winger with uncertain minutes.

Team context:

Mexico are hosts. That matters. Home advantage, crowd pressure and a favorable emotional environment can help them push through the group.

Summary:

Raul is not the safest YES by raw probability, but he is a very interesting risk/reward profile because penalty duty + 9 role + host nation can turn one average game into goal.

5) Mikel Oyarzabal YES

Limit order 35c

Why:

Penalty status:

likely Spain main penalty taker, with Lamine Yamal and Rodri as alternatives.

Role:

Oyarzabal is not the flashiest Spain attacker, but he is one of the most useful profiles for this market: forward / false 9 / left sided attacker

Team upside:

Spain can go very deep. They are one of the best teams in the tournament by structure, midfield control and chance creation.

Group setup:

Spain face Cabo Verde, Saudi Arabia and Uruguay. Cabo Verde and Saudi Arabia are the key fixtures for this market. Spain can dominate possession and create enough volume for a forward to score.

Why market can underrate him:

people usually prefer names like Yamal, Nico Williams, Pedri or Olmo. But for to score at least once, penalty duty and central attacking role matter more than hype.

Summary:

Oyarzabal is exactly the type of player I like in this market: possible penalty taker, forward role, strong team, soft group matches and deep run potential.

@PolymarketSport
@PolymarketTrade

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@korenssss fells like risky but profitable strategy. Why not)

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@mmoyshaa 🤝

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@Nikitont waiting for the fist full AI-generated movie!

[Predict0r @Predicti0r]

@polygamingxyz @Polymarket @PolymarketSport @PolymarketCS2 👍