ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ

RIGHT WING DEATH SQUAD

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

Kalau mau tau apa yang saya dukung, baca ini aja.

[𝘼𝙣𝙘𝙖𝙥 𝘼𝙞𝙧 🛫 @AncapAir]

What is Capitalism?

Many people misunderstand the ideas of capitalism. They often conflate it with corporatism, or believe it to be some sort of exploitative system to make the wealthy more money at the expense of the poor. In truth, capitalism at its core is defined as the free and voluntary exchange of private property within a free market. It thrives on the principles of individual liberty, private ownership, and the spontaneous order that emerges from the unregulated interactions of individuals. Simply put, capitalism is the natural order of things when liberty is allowed to thrive, unmolested by the state.

Private property is the cornerstone of capitalism. It empowers individuals to own, control, and exchange their possessions freely, to include their own labor. One point often made by capitalist opponents is that one must own capital to be a capitalist; however, they fail to realize that one’s own labor is capital, available to be voluntarily invested in exchange for a wage. Voluntary exchange, the lifeblood of capitalism, ensures that all transactions occur with the mutual consent of involved parties. Contrary to some misconceptions, capitalism is not synonymous with cronyism or exploitation; instead, it is merely a lack of a system that encourages self-determination and innovation through market mechanisms. In essence, capitalism champions individual freedom by fostering a dynamic and responsive economic environment.

Many object to the idea of wage labor, stating that it is not voluntary, as they feel that the only options are work or starvation. There are actually four basic voluntary options that any individual has:

1. Voluntarily exchange their labor for a mutually agreed upon wage,
2. Start their own enterprise, often by soliciting investors to voluntarily exchange equity for seed capital,
3. Live an entirely self-sufficient lifestyle by growing vegetables and herbs, along with hunting game, and developing solutions for electricity, or other provisions as one desires, or
4. Starvation

This is not an issue with capitalism, however. Those who posit such a notion must also logically believe that the gazelle should lay itself down at the feet of the lioness because her only “choices” are to hunt or starve. Is the lioness a victim of capitalism, then? Of course not. She is simply the subject of nature, as nature requires work from all species to thrive. Everything requires work, and to suggest that nature is somehow exploitative is utterly nonsensical. Nature mandates that all creatures, including human beings, must work in some way. It is necessary for our very survival.

Where things get a little more complicated is the issue of corporate power. This concern is not entirely without merit, but in the absence of the state, things fundamentally change. The very conception of a "corporation" within anarchism undergoes a substantial transformation, distinct from its contemporary form entangled with state influence. Anarchism, by its very nature, condemns the existence of a governing body capable of providing special privileges or protections to certain entities. Consequently, the modern notion of a corporation, often rightly criticized for leveraging the state’s monopoly on violence for advantages, would have its power significantly reduced. Unlike the state, which exercises arbitrary and invalid authority over all individuals in all places without their consent, the authority of any private firm is confined to its private property lines. Similar to how an individual holds dominion over their property, possessing full authority within those boundaries, their control over others ceases the moment those individuals step onto the sidewalk.

In anarchy, enterprises, regardless of size, would be required to thrive and compete based on the merit of their products, services, and voluntary associations. The absence of a state-sanctioned framework for corporate operations would foster an environment where businesses, whatever form they may take, would be shaped by the principles of voluntary exchange and cooperation. This evolution in the concept of a corporation aligns with anarchism's goal of dismantling structures that enable the concentration of power, ensuring that economic entities derive their influence solely from consensual interactions within the market.

A pervasive myth surrounding capitalism is the fear of monopolies; essentially large corporations wielding unchecked power over the market. However, a closer examination reveals that such concerns are unfounded and rooted in misconceptions about how free markets operate. In a truly free market, devoid of government intervention, the dynamics of competition serve as a robust safeguard against monopolistic tendencies.

Contrary to popular belief, genuine monopolies, where a single entity dominates an entire industry, would be incredibly rare in a truly free market. While these are theoretically possible, they would only occur if the free market was content with what the company provides, its quality, and price point. The competitive nature of capitalism, however, incentivizes innovation, efficiency, and the constant pursuit of consumer satisfaction. New and existing businesses engage in a dynamic dance of innovation and improvement to gain a competitive edge. This perpetual rivalry prevents any single entity from monopolizing a market as consumers gravitate towards the best products and services available.

Anarchism, aligned with the principles of free-market capitalism, amplifies the effectiveness of competition by removing artificial barriers to entry that are created by the state. There would not exist any regulations that shield established businesses from new entrants. This ensures a level playing field, allowing innovative and agile businesses to challenge existing ones, even if they are a powerhouse with 95% market share. The absence of artificial barriers promotes a merit-based system where companies must continually earn their place in the market through the provision of superior goods and/or services at a price point established by the market itself.

Corporate accountability is also a valid concern today, but it finds a powerful ally in the mechanisms of the free market under anarchism. In a voluntary exchange system, companies are held accountable by the choices of informed consumers. Consumers, armed with the freedom to choose, become the ultimate arbiters of corporate behavior. Companies that fail to meet ethical standards, provide subpar products, fail to be transparent, or engage in unfair practices risk losing their customer base to competitors. This competitive pressure acts as a powerful incentive for companies to operate transparently, ethically, and efficiently. In essence, the market acts as a democratic force, with consumers casting their "votes" through the products and services they choose to support.

Anarchism's removal of state interventions further strengthens this accountability. State-protected monopolies often enjoy insulation from the consequences of their actions, shielded by regulations and subsidies. In contrast, a free-market anarchist society dismantles such barriers, exposing companies to direct market feedback. This transparency ensures that businesses must earn and maintain trust through voluntary interactions, fostering a system where corporate accountability is not just a lofty ideal but an inherent outcome of the dynamic market forces at play.

Capitalism, in its truest form, is the embodiment of free and voluntary exchanges within a market, grounded in the principles of individual liberty and private ownership. It thrives on the spontaneous order that arises when individuals are free to interact without state interference. The cornerstone of capitalism, private property, empowers individuals and fosters an environment where self-determination and innovation flourish.

Addressing concerns surrounding wage labor and corporate power, anarchism transforms the very nature of corporate entities, limiting their authority to their property lines and subjecting them to the competitive forces of the market. Anarchism, aligned with free-market principles, dispels the myths of monopolies, promoting a competitive landscape devoid of artificial barriers and ensuring a merit-based system. Corporate accountability, vital for ethical and transparent business practices, finds a robust ally in the informed choices of consumers within a voluntary exchange system, amplified by the absence of state interventions. Anarchism, therefore, not only aligns with the principles of free-market capitalism but strengthens and refines them, creating a natural framework where liberty and voluntary cooperation thrive.

I will never hide my posts behind a Subscription on 𝕏. Please consider donating.

CashApp - $AncapAir

₿TC ⚡️ - [email protected]

#Bitcoin #BTC - bc1q3m2gh3cfmp7hc99eak7qqgxnt9stxfletfe8v6

#Ethereum #ETH - 0xd7C435F772949052CB717162bE1C71989F6917d5

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@bingus92585042 Just because you're offended doesn't mean it comes from a place of hate. We don't need hatred to uphold what's right and just.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@hammsqi Gabisa dibandingin sama dia. Pak Anies percaya dengan mekanisme pasar, Zohran tidak.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@meinerdbeer @hailarius Apa sih maksudnya? "Ngga menormalisasi" itu maksudnya apa? Dan kenapa seakan menjadi sebuah urgency untuk dituntaskan? Dan kalau "nggak dinormalisasi", emang gak bisa baca di tempat umum?

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@allandbagus @anggita_ku57826 Komunis tolol. Beri SATU contoh negara komunis yg makmur. Beri SATU contoh dimana kepemilikan kolektif thd mode produksi itu berfungsi dgn baik.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@keptenhusin @allandbagus Sosialis bukan pujian. Marxisme GAGAL di uni soviet.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@Adtarie No one gets on Twitter in a good mood. They're here to look for reasons to be mad about something.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@AisNobi @inganggita Kalo ada kecelakaan lagi siapa yg mau tanggung jawab hah? Kualitas pemikiran pesantren segini aja nih?

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@jaxajueny He died practicing free speech. He was using his free speech to criticize Israel, investigate controversial things that might put (((powerful people))) in danger, and he died for doing those things.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@soilssacred @danielle_liat @ShaykhSulaiman We're not jew haters, we're lie haters. We want truth, and the facts point to that direction. You're not using logic, so either you're jewish or (((they))) have got into you.

This is not an attack against judeo whatever, this is an attack against evil.

[Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 @BasedSamParker]

UPDATE: REVEALED—the man talking to Charlie Kirk at the moment he was shot was a jew named Hunter Kozak (hoodie), inserting yet another odd jewish angle into this narrative.

Because he was the last one talking to Charlie, this ensured additional attention for him, like the interview below. Kozak's chosen topic? The truth about the role of transgenders in mass shootings. A little too on the nose 👃, wouldn't you say? If I were conspiratorial, I might say that the real engineers of Charlie's assassination wanted to misdirect our focus onto "muh transgenders!"

Kozak joins the man who captured this generation's Zapruder film (kippah), & George Zinn—the jew who initially claimed credit for the shooting and created a diversion that helped the shooter escape—in a weird confluence of jewish elements in Charlie Kirk's assassination. Is it all just a cohencidence?

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Israel assassinated Charlie Kirk and now the jews have literally overtaken his show.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@danielle_liat @soilssacred @ShaykhSulaiman Also Fuentes is mostly despised by the moderate conservatives and far left. So he's no threat (or not yet, since he's becoming more popular).

No one else had been Israel's best friend other than Charlie. Until recently.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@danielle_liat @soilssacred @ShaykhSulaiman Charlie Kirk was the one investigating the more controversial things that could be linked to some jewish figures. So not only did he turn away from Israel, he was also a threat to (((them))).

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@AddiR78452 @ShaykhSulaiman The facts point to Israel, Bill Ackman, Netanyahu, etc.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@ZacksJerryRig Jerry, watch Candace Owens. Israel is behind the public execution of Charlie Kirk. Charlie had recently shifted his views on Israel, Netanyahu offered $150mil for him, he refused, then he was dead.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@hansdavidian SJW fag

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@_6signxxx Still mad about race? Wake up, a bigger disaster is incoming. Israel is behind Charlie Kirk's death.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@Atoledo38Jandro @rio_norias @FlagBlack007 Sorry I revise. Israel is behind it all. Watch Candace Owens.

[ᴋᴀɴᴀɴ ʟɪʙᴇʀᴀʟ @primanokta]

@BudiBukanIntel @3xcelsis Sosialisme lebih fasis daripada fasisme. Fact.