prochaskova

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@LucaBraCZ i ja! ale porad je to jenom auto, nekam nas odveze a hotovo. ja chtela elektricke bmw, ale penezenka nejak nesouhlasila :)

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@skala_vit @fipa invazní druhy jsou ty červené. toto je rak modrý, neinvazní :)

[Ryan Hart @thisdudelikesAI]

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@senkadam Ne vsechny kluby v praze maj velky zimaky s dostatkem saten

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@Memekolora110 chtěla jsem si lehnout na gauč, ale asi radši vyrazím do nějaké posilovny zabrat bench a pokoušet se zvedat tu tyčku. tlustým kurvám zdar!

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@LucaBraCZ Jaloze myslis, ze kdyz mluvil o mouce, kdyz se kurvy spikly, tak se chystal delat vanocku, jo? 🤣

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@LucaBraCZ Pryc s nim, hajzlem jednim. Drzim palce, uz jsem uplne vytesnila, jaky to bylo

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@ondra82595907 @TerezAnarchy KFC má v ČR pouze jediný frančízant - AmRest

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@fendrych_m on má člověk předpokládat, že chlap ve středním věku si neumí říct o pomoc? ano, divná doba. děti se to učí už ve školce. zkuste to dohnat

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@kv_hasek Mam dum o par let starsi a topim elektrinou. Takze povolenky za co2 uz davno platim. A vy ne. Jde jen o narovnani situace.

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@davidrajmont @michalpur nezlobte se, ale to je čirá demagogie, protože nikde EU neříká, že cílem je emisně náročnou produkci vyhnat na druhý konec zeměkoule.

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@LucaBraCZ na kvízu budeš nabušenej 😂

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@ilblog @cermak je možné nebýt tým Linda a nesouhlasit s nazory @cermak ?

[Lukas Hatas 🌍 @HatasLukas]

Konečně pořádná studie emisí elektromobilu s dobíjením z našeho energetického mixu. Výsledek úspora 46% emisí CO2 a 100% karcinogenních látek z výfuku.

Celá studie @VUTvBrne:

https://t.co/Uac0tfptLc

Co na to @CVUTPraha?

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@Jakubprazskej Krome tech vymluv o taxi, odboceni apod dodam, ze to nikdo nepokutuje. Ta obcasna hlidka pod shellkou, co uvladne vypsat 5 pokut po 200 kace za hodinu je k smichu. Kdyby to “nekdo” chtel vymahat, tak muze istalovat kamery a cteni spz. Ale ocividnw nechce.

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@zlutakytka Tam byly odbery krve 🙈

[prochaskova @prochaskova]

@Alzacz @divobabka Co pro zacatek ukazat adresatovi aspon info, ze balik je vysoko, aby se na to mohl pripravit?

[Ranga.🇿🇼 @RangaMberi]

“Let me stop you right there…”

Caribbean nation Guyana is booming after discovering oil. BBC’s Stephen Sackur puts it to President @presidentaligy; lobbyists say oil is bad for the climate.

Dude wasn’t having it. Mans was ready!