Our Privacy Notice defines facial recognition as requiring a database of faces or biometric templates that checks new images against that database.
Proctorio's device biometric matching doesn't do that.
Our full Privacy Notice: https://t.co/ybEMDiUKAN
Myth: Proctorio scans your face and checks it against a database of other people.
Fact: We've never done that, and we still don't. There is no database of faces to match against.
Our full Privacy Notice: https://t.co/ybEMDiUcLf
Read the full blog here: https://t.co/wLkzDhPthY
In 2026 and 2027, we're changing how we show up for our partners.
Our conference strategy will focus on events where institutions are actively working to strengthen learning integrity amid rapid industry change.
Read the full blog here: https://t.co/kCU7Ep80X4
The conversation around digital learning, and AI in Europe has two camps: a return to the traditional classroom or an all digital future.
We opt for a third path, a layered approach where institutions choose the right model for each circumstance.
https://t.co/T3Qvp0fMjo
Proctorio's technology does not use biometrics. That hasn't changed. What has changed is institutions are asking for stronger identity verification.
Our full Privacy Notice: https://t.co/ybEMDiUKAN
Read the full blog here: https://t.co/wLkzDhQ17w
Multiple choice exams are easier to grade and to cheat on. That tradeoff has always existed, AI just raised the stakes. Our latest post uses an entrance exam case to walk through seven integrity strategies to see where your approach might have gaps.
https://t.co/L2x5sKeEzV
A jump in high scores does not automatically mean a jump in cheating. It might just mean cheating that was always happening is now visible. Worth a read if you are planning any high stakes
assessment this year.
https://t.co/L2x5sKfcpt
We broke down what Anthropic's recent agentic misuse report revealed about AI clearing CAPTCHA, and why continuous session monitoring, not a single checkpoint, is what holds up against a determined automated agent.
Read more: https://t.co/XpCrFg5Puc
Using two different proctoring vendors for one exam sounds like extra coverage. In practice, it is more likely to leave gaps neither company is positioned to catch.
These are the technology lessons from a recent entrance exam that did not go as planned.
https://t.co/L2x5sKfcpt
A CAPTCHA challenge is a locked door. It is not a guard who stays in the room.
That's the distinction as AI models get better at clearing one time checks. Anthropic's report gave an example, their model solved CAPTCHA without even being built to do it.
https://t.co/XpCrFg5Puc
Humans move a cursor in arcs, with small constant corrections. Automated sessions travel in straight lines at a fixed speed.
These are the kinds of signals our Behavior Tracker reads continuously throughout a session.
Read more: https://t.co/XpCrFg5Puc
Avoid all or nothing events. Modernize the assessment format. Consider the context students are operating in.
None of these are technology fixes, and that is the point. What determines a large scale remote exams success, happens before students log in.
https://t.co/L2x5sKfcpt
Here is an uncomfortable truth about CAPTCHA: it only checks once, and only checks one thing.
An AI keeps trying until something works and the moment it does, nothing is checking who is behind the keyboard for the rest of the session.
Read more: https://t.co/XpCrFg5Puc
An university saw students scoring near perfect on their entrance exam jump from under 1% to over 5%, after moving the exam online. 58,000 students had to retake it.
Our latest post digs into what happened what could have prevented it.
https://t.co/L2x5sKeEzV
Anthropic published a report on agentic AI misuse. Their own model beat CAPTCHA, the system built to keep bots out, without even trying to.
If a general purpose AI clears it by accident, a motivated actor with purpose built tools clears it even faster.
https://t.co/XpCrFg5hEE
The conversation around proctoring has split into two: calling for a return to the traditional classroom and pushing an all digital future. This session makes the case for a third path where institutions choose the right model for each circumstance.
https://t.co/bzlfiDnJJL
Why do students cheat? Not because they're bad people. It's often because the way an assessment is built makes cheating the rational choice.
Change the perception, and you change the behavior.
Read the full conversation: https://t.co/eYoQ2QHZMy
Your students legal rights depends on whether your school is public or private.
At public institutions, students hold a 14th Amendment property right to their education.
At private institutions, the student handbook functions as a contract.
https://t.co/cjAA5hlOc9
A school asked for budget to deal with AI integrity issues. Administration said no. Then a lawsuit landed. Suddenly there was funding and three new hires.
There is now a whole industry of law firms built around defending students accused of AI cheating.
https://t.co/cjAA5hmm1H
Professors did not sign up to be AI detectives.
In this interview an ethics professor put it plainly: faculty are spending more time trying to figure out how an assignment was done than they are grading it. That is not sustainable for anyone.
https://t.co/cjAA5hmm1H