@RepThomasMassie if DOJ arrests a sitting member of Congress for filming the evidence in the "reading room" for the crimes of the DOJ themselves then the optics look really really bad for DOJ and calls for impeachment of DOJ heads would be loudly accepted #filmauditthemetadata
@RepThomasMassie why am I so adamant about filming the "reading room" against the law? Because if you come out of there saying what you saw you have zero proof. With the clandestine filming by a given congressman you have video proof of a cover-up by DOJ
@RepThomasMassie, the DOJ is treating their "Boss" (Congress) like a trespasser. If they continue to hide the "To" and "From" of this trafficking network, they are co-conspirators after the fact. Turn the cameras on the gatekeepers. 🎥🛡️ #AuditTheDOJ
@RepThomasMassie
The Legal Shield: Introduce the footage directly into the Congressional Record during an @OversightGOP hearing. This grants the absolute protection of the Speech or Debate Clause. The act becomes a protected legislative function, not a "leak."
@RepThomasMassie Legally, the DOJ uses "Survivor Protection" as a shield. But if the footage shows they are redacting the Names of the Men discussing "procurement," that is willful defiance of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. It’s evidence of a cover-up.
@RepThomasMassie The Strategy: A targeted strike on Metadata. Film ONLY the blacked-out headers. No victim names. No graphic content. No images. By capturing the "Black Ink" on sender/recipient lines only, you strip the DOJ of their Privacy Act defense.
@RepThomasMassie The DOJ "reading room" isn’t security—it’s a gag order. If they’re redacting "To" & "From" fields on procurement emails, they aren't protecting victims; they’re shielding the "Silk Handcuffs" of the elite. Time for a Technical Audit.🧵 #EpsteinFiles#Transparency