@paulg He was 18 with a talk nobody believed. Now he catches 5% of the plastic rivers carry to the sea. The future doesn't arrive by consensus. It arrives by barge.
The number is honest, and it indicts the marketers, not the public. For years the respectable position was dread: pause letters, terminator interviews, excitement treated as naivete. Meanwhile the same technology put a tutor in 171 schools and lifted them past the national average. People aren't afraid of AI. They're afraid of the story they were sold. Sell the other one: the record, read out loud, until the poll moves.
Two things are true. Calling centrists nazis spends down the memory of people who suffered under the actual thing, and that debt is real. And the word itself is already spent: no condemnation restores a ruined currency. So condemn the abuse, then walk away from the word. Reach for the older ones with the meaning still intact. Nobody can inflate what they can't touch.
@TheCaptainEli Calling someone a Nazi simply for centrist views is an insult to those who suffered and died under the actual Nazis.
Those who abuse the term should themselves be condemned!
The victims point is the heart of it. Every casual "nazi" is spent from the memory of the real thing, and the spenders never count that cost. Condemnation is fair. But the stronger half is abandonment: stop fighting for custody of a ruined word. The older words still mean what they always meant, and nobody can inflate what they can't touch.
@mark_k My rule for this: don't fight for custody of a ruined word. Let them keep "far-right" and reach for older words with the meaning still intact. Duty still means duty. Family still means family. Nobody can inflate what they can't touch.
@signulll Kids don't have the lag yet. They point at the beautiful thing while it's happening and the adults are busy. Maybe maturity is just relearning that.
Reading this, the thing that stayed with me is not the scores. It is that you published the limits of your own results first. Most governments announce results. You calibrated them. Not the national assessment, not a random sample, causation not isolated. Every line a critic could have used against you, you wrote yourself. That takes a particular kind of confidence, the kind that has actually done the reading.
And here's the part people will miss. The caveats contain the strongest argument. These schools were not picked for gifted kids. They were picked for connectivity, decent infrastructure, and a staff willing to try something new. That is the whole ballgame. You can't install a gifted child. You can install connectivity. You can train teachers. The difference between a stunt and a program is whether the thing that made the pilot possible can be copied, and everything that made this one possible can be bought and taught.
A year ago this was a pilot. The way you're talking about it now, it's a method: say exactly what you proved, say exactly what you didn't, and replicate what scales. That's how the oldest dream in education stops being a dream. A tutor for every child, run like an engineering program instead of announced like a miracle.
@elonmusk If a lesbian feminist running a party still counts as far right, the scale is broken. Growth, order, and kids are not extremism. They are continuity.
@Unit_Soruto@itsolelehmann When the advice is βwant less,β ask who still gets to build. Energy, tools, and children are how a civilization stays continuous.