@TheGadFlyRising@AgainstAtheismX I’m not saying that there aren’t different life forms with different characteristics. That’s ridiculous. I’m saying that the lines we draw between these life forms are simply for categorization. I see how this can be confusing to somebody who doesn’t actually understand evolution
@TheGadFlyRising@AgainstAtheismX Evolution is a result of adaptation.
Species being a manmade categorization does not mean Darwin was wrong. Not even sure how you came to that conclusion to be honest.
@TheGadFlyRising@AgainstAtheismX First of all, “species” is nothing more than a man-made categorization. Secondly, we have countless examples of transitional fossils.
I encourage you to watch Forrest Valkai’s series explaining evolution. Here’s episode 1
https://t.co/fmT7c5HDYT
@NotEvolution1 The difference being that we have tangible and observable evidence of what happened millions of years ago, where you mostly have unverified stories and hearsay
@harper_pau55997@CCanuck4 Atheism isn’t a worldview. It’s a non-belief in one specific thing. That doesn’t mean we don’t believe in ANYTHING.
Science and atheism are separate and unrelated. I don’t really care to educate you on what atheism actually is - but I encourage you do to some research.
@ravikiran_dev7 So? That’s why they hire people with that particular skill set to do that specific work. A CEO needs to know how to build the company, not how to do that small work.
@harper_pau55997@CCanuck4 No, I’m not without a worldview.
No, I don’t believe I don’t exist.
No, I’m not left wing.
You genuinely have no clue what you’re talking about 😂
@harper_pau55997@CCanuck4 Another false claim. Atheism is nothing more than a lack of belief, or disbelief, in any deities. That’s all. I would know - I’m one of them
You can’t trust religious people to teach you about what it means to live without religion.
@harper_pau55997@CCanuck4 You have a complete and utter misunderstanding of the purpose science and what atheism actually is. Literally nothing you’ve said so far is true.
@harper_pau55997@CCanuck4 It’s not true to say science doesn’t question the existence of god. There is no scientific evidence for the existence of god, therefore it is not a consideration. The universe operates around both randomness and order, not just one or the other.
@harper_pau55997@CCanuck4 Science is trying to discover the truth. There’s no evidence of gods existence, therefore it’s currently not a consideration when there are more plausible and supported explanations for the workings of the universe. There’s no guess work involved.
@anchoredso37497 Atheists don’t start with the conclusion and twist evidence to fit our worldview. That’s what theists do.
Atheists start with the evidence and let the conclusions reveal themselves. There is no “blinding” ourselves with a worldview when we follow the evidence.