Prop Firm Track

Trader-focused • Always unbiased

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@femziiy) requested a payout from @fortraderscom.

After requested payout they e-mailed him claiming that – the person whose ID was used for verification is not the same person operating the account.

[Prop Firm Edge @Propfirmedge]

🚨 EXPOSE: Is This How Upcomers Treat Profitable Traders? 🚨

A trader earns a $2,200 payout.

Instead of paying what was earned, Upcomers offers only $200.

Read that again.

$2,200 earned. $200 offered.

And it doesn’t stop there.

According to the screenshots:

The trader requested 3 payouts and received excuse after excuse.
Instead of honoring the full payout, they tried to settle for less than 10% of what was owed.
They allegedly asked the trader to remove Trustpilot and X reviews before resolving the case.

If the trader really violated the rules, why offer $200 at all?

If your decision is legitimate, why ask for negative reviews to be deleted?

This sets a dangerous precedent:
Reject the payout, offer a small amount to silence the trader, and hope the case disappears.

The screenshots are attached. Read them yourself and decide.

Traders: Protect your capital. Don’t risk your money with firms that won’t stand behind their own payout commitments.

Upcomers, the trading community deserves answers. Not excuses. Pay traders what they’ve legitimately earned.

#propfirmedge

[Prop world news @propworldnews]

Three payout requests.

Three different excuses.

Now a $2,200 payout somehow becomes a $200 offer... but only if the trader stays quiet? 👀

@upcomers_com

@JakubUPC

If you're confident your decision is fair, why would anyone need to delete reviews or stop talking?

Pay the trader if the payout is valid.

Or publish the evidence if it isn't.

Trying to make criticism disappear instead of addressing it only raises one question:

What exactly are you trying to hide?

The more these cases surface, the more traders will question whether the real risk isn't the market... it's requesting a payout from @upcomers_com.

#propworldnews📈

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

We previously covered this trader case.

He requested 3 payouts and every single time @upcomers_com gave him excuses instead of paying him.

Now, instead of his full $2,200 payout. They're offering him only $200.

On top of that, they're pressuring him to delete his Trustpilot and X reviews.

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@KASHTRADER22) 4th payout was rejected by @EquityEdgeUK under the 'One-Sided Betting' rule.

He had already received 3 payouts using the exact same trading style, but when it came to his 4th payout. They suddenly used this rule as an excuse to deny it.

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@dirmees2) has been waiting over 12 days for his payout. After asking a simply Payout related question in the @Nextstagefunded Discord server, he was 'Timed Out'.

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@Random_trader1) had 3 funded accounts with @upcomers_com – and all 3 ran into payout issues, each with a different excuse.

• First payout: Rejected for 'One-sided betting'.

He was taking just 1 trade per day, across different days and pairs. No overtrading, No revenge trading and No excessive risk.

• Second payout: Rejected for 'Gambling'.

Trades were held for 1-2 hours, with 15-30 minutes between entries. Risk was controlled, yet the payout was still denied.

• Third payout: This time, the issue was 'No losing trades'.

UPCOMERS claimed an 'All or Nothing' strategy, paid only $257 out of $500. Reduced future payouts to 50% and suspended all accounts.

[Prop Firm Edge @Propfirmedge]

Traders don’t want drama. Traders just want to get paid.

The real noise starts when firms reject payouts, ignore genuine cases, block criticism, and then complain when traders speak up.

Instead of calling it noise, try resolving legitimate trader issues. Accountability isn’t drama. It’s part of running a prop firm.

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

Hey @CianHansardAF – why aren’t you showing the full picture?

Review pages don’t post anything out of thin Air. Trader's complaints are publicly available and review pages are just highlighting them.

On your Trustpilot profile – 39% of the reviews are 1★. If you’re not scamming trader's, why does your profile have that many Negative Reviews?

Thanks @Adam_Aabaad for highlighting this.

[Prop world news @propworldnews]

So which one should traders believe? 👀

The MT5 history?

Or the story being told by @upcomers_com?

If the trader truly breached the Daily Drawdown Limit, show the calculation.

Show the exact breach point.

Show the numbers.

Because when a trader's platform says one thing and the firm's dashboard says another, people start asking questions.

@JakubUPC

Instead of expecting blind trust, provide clear evidence.

The more these cases appear, the more traders should think twice before handing their money to this firm.

#propworldnews📈

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

@PhelmsBuff @upcomers_com @JakubUPC apologized to @PhelmsBuff for not being satisfied with @upcomers_com service and asked him to DM him. The trader did, but his problem is still not solved.

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@PhelmsBuff) purchased a $100K account from @upcomers_com. On their website, it shows his account hit the Daily Drawdown Limit. But in his MT5 history, it shows he did not hit the Daily Drawdown Limit.

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

@Propfirmedge @ckcapitaluk_ They're still operating? 😳

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

@Propfirmedge @upcomers_com Lot of trader's complaints about them

[Prop Firm Edge @Propfirmedge]

🚨 Another trader reporting issues with @upcomers_com.

According to the trader, a $10K account was breached after just 2 profitable trades, with no clear explanation provided.

If the firm has evidence of a rule violation, publish it publicly. If not, traders deserve transparency and answers.

Breaching accounts without a solid explanation destroys trust faster than any losing trade.

@upcomers_com @JakubUPC the community is watching. Explain the breach or resolve the trader’s issue.

[Prop world news @propworldnews]

So let me get this straight... 👀

A trader closes 2 profitable trades.

Makes money.

Follows the challenge.

And then the account gets breached?

@upcomers_com

@JakubUPC

What exactly was the reason?

Where is the explanation?

Where is the evidence?

Because "trust us" is not a valid answer when a trader's account is on the line.

The number of complaints involving @upcomers_com keeps growing, and every new case raises the same question:

Why do so many issues seem to appear when traders start making progress?

Trade carefully and do your own research before dealing with this firm.

#propworldnews📈

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@aizazu64) after closing 2 profitable trades on his $10K account. @upcomers_com breached his account without any solid reason.

@PropFirmMedia, @trustedprophub & @propfirmeye – Raise your Voice for this trade.

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

Scam alert ⚠️ @upcomers_com scam exposed⬇️

The trader @aliyassin1414
successfully passed Phase 2 of the evaluation on two separate accounts.

However, in both instances, @upcomers_com
manually suspended the accounts immediately after the Phase 2 completion, citing an "API Error" as the reason for the suspension.

First account: 575215

This pattern, consistent successful completion of Phase 2 followed by immediate manual suspension,raises concerns regarding the platform evaluation process and account handling procedures.

The trader has documented the sequence of events on both accounts, with the suspensions occurring right after passing requirements were met.
@jakubupc

[Prop Firm Track @propfirmtrack]

This trader (@aliyassin1414) passed phase 2 account twice on two different accounts, but both times @upcomers_com manually suspended his account right after passing, claiming a 'API Error'.

First account number: 575215