Russell Worley

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@tedcruz Christ is King.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

'He has a point, but he's too blunt.'

From the start, a key tactic of the gender identitarians has been linguistic prescription, and it's proved shockingly successful. Trans activists' shibboleths and euphemisms have been allowed to penetrate the upper echelons of our culture with devastating consequences to freedom of speech and belief. Huge swathes of liberal media, the arts, academia and publishing have thrown themselves with gusto into the defence of a quasi-religious belief causing provable real world harm, and in their arrogance they've been outraged when people they assumed were part of their In Group have refused to march meekly along in lock step.

Time and again, I've seen and heard well-educated people who consider themselves critical thinkers and bold truth-tellers squirm when put on the spot. 'Well, yes, maybe there's something in what you're saying, but it's hateful/provocative/rude not to use the approved language/pretend people can literally change sex/keep drawing attention to medical malpractice or opportunistic sexual predators. Why can't you be nice? Why won't you pretend? We thought you were one of us! Don't you realise we have sophisticated new words and phrases these days that obviate the necessity of thinking any of this through?'

As the vibe shifts, and a lot of people in the elite professions start trying to reposition themselves, the obvious place to start is, 'it's not that I couldn't see your point, but did you have to say it that way?' We dissenters were supposed to find a way of questioning the chemical castration of children while calling it 'gender affirming care.' We were meant to defend the rights of vulnerable women while also using female pronouns for male rapists. We should have found a way to discuss fairness for women and girls in sport, while pretending that the ineradicable physical advantage men have over women doesn't exist.

Either a man can be a woman, or he can't. Either women deserve rights, or they don't. Either there's a provable medical benefit to transitioning children, or there isn't. Either you're on the side of a totalitarian ideology that seeks to impose falsehoods on society through the threat of ostracisation, shaming and violence, or you're not. The alternative to being 'blunt' - using accurate, factual language to describe what was going on - was to surrender freedom of speech and espouse ideological jargon that obfuscated the issues and the harms caused. We've always needed blunt people, but we need them most of all when being asked to bow down to a naked emperor.

[Nick Freitas @NickJFreitas]

I am told that as a state representative this is the moment where I'm supposed to express my heartfelt condolences and then stand in solidarity with those on the other side of the aisle as we condemn political violence and stand unified as one people.

But we aren't "one people" are we?

The truth is we haven't been for some time now, and there is really no point in pretending anymore, if there ever was.

We are two very different peoples. We may occupy the same piece of geography, but that is where the similarities seem to abruptly end.

I convinced myself for a long time that whenever the left called me a racist, a bigot, a sexist, a fascist, a "threat to democracy" for even the most innocent of disagreements, that it was simply hyperbolic rhetoric done for effect.

And now the "effect" is a widow and two orphaned children, because the left couldn’t bear the thought of a peaceful man debating them and winning.

I don’t think they realize it yet, but murdering Charlie is going to be remembered as the day where we finally woke up to what this fight really is.

It’s not a civil dispute among fellow countrymen. It’s a war between diametrically opposed worldviews which cannot peacefully coexist with one another. One side will win, and one side will lose.

Charlie tried to win that fight through argumentation, through discussion, through peaceful resolution of differences.

And the other side murdered him.

Not because he was “extreme” or “inciting violence” or any other hyperbolic slur they hurled at him. They murdered him because he was effective. Because he was unafraid. Because he inspired others and made them feel like they had a voice, that they were not alone. And he did it at the very institutions which have fomented so much hatred toward conservatives.

I don’t want to “stand in solidarity” with the other side of the aisle. I want to defeat you. I want to defeat the godless ideology that kills babies in the womb, sterilizes confused children, turns our cities into cesspools of degeneracy and lawlessness…and that murdered Charlie Kirk.

Social media is aflame right now with leftist celebration of Charlie’s death.

I wonder if any among them understand what has just happened. If there is a Yamamoto somewhere in their midst warning, that all they have done is awoken a sleeping giant.

I doubt it. I think they gave up such introspection and self-awareness long ago.

I don’t know exactly what will happen next. I just know that it won’t be the same as what has happened in the past.

There will be thoughts and prayers…Charlie would have wanted prayers. Not for himself but for those left behind and for the country that he loved.

But then there will be a reckoning.

My Christian faith requires me to love my enemies and pray for those who curse me. It does not require me to stand idly by in the midst of savagery and barbarism...quite the opposite.

So every time I feel tired, every time I feel discouraged or overwhelmed, I am going to watch the video of a good man being murdered in Utah…I will force myself to watch it…and then I will return to the work of destroying the evil ideology responsible for that and so much more.

Rest with God Charlie, your fight is over.

Ours is just beginning.

[White American @White_Amercan]

“I began to question why do only White countries have the moral obligation to live in this experimental diversity”

[George @BehizyTweets]

BREAKING: Congress just released BOMBSHELL findings on the January 6th pipe bomb investigation, revealing that the FBI engaged in a massive coverup.

The Committee determined that "There is conflicting information as to whether the FBI received “corrupted” cellular data from the major cell carriers. A former senior FBI official testified that the major cell carrier companies provided “corrupted” cell data to the FBI and suggested that that “corrupted” data may have contained the identity of the pipe bomber; however, in responses to letters from the Subcommittee, the major cell carriers confirmed that they did not provide corrupted data to the FBI and that the FBI never notified them of any issues with accessing the cellular data."

"After more than 1,400 days since two pipe bombs were placed on Capitol Hill, the FBI has made no arrest and has charged no individuals with planting the explosive devices. Since its initial progress in the early weeks and months of the investigation, there has been little meaningful progress toward the apprehension of the suspect."

Do you mean to tell me they were able to track down & arrest hundreds of J6ers mere days after January 6th but still can't get their hands on the actual terrorist who endangered the entire government? Yeah, we're not buying what they're selling. EVERYONE AT THE FBI MUST GET ARRESTED.

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@LAGovJeffLandry It's important for the ruling class to distinguish and elevate itself from and above the lowly plebs it governs. You've done that remarkably well with this post. No amount of death or destruction should delay leisure and entertainment of the ruling class.

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@DanCrenshawTX @johnrich The bar for a politician has always been low, but you drop it into the depths of the Mariana trench.

You represent the typical career trajectory of a lowly politician. Get the gig, get the money, then shit on, steal from, and generally betray the constituency you represent.

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@GuntherEagleman

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@GuntherEagleman Yes

[Bonchie @bonchieredstate]

Let me simplify this H1-B thing.

The top 1% of immigrants who provide unique skills and innovation? Yes.

H1-Bs for interns and entry-level positions (from engineering to accounting) without any real attempt to attract and hire Americans? No.

That's it. That's the argument.

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@YetiMoose @GRN__JCKT @DubzyOnceAgain Did you see the link?

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@aviflombaum @BenTelAviv @elonmusk @X The corporation's financial accounting and financial statements are required to be prepared under GAAP and IFRS rules. There are no mystery intricacies subject to insider knowledge. All that is required is a competent CPA.

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@elonmusk @AutismCapital

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@AntiLeftMemes

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@kdrum Your post saying there is not a loss of trust in media will have the very ironic but deserving effect of further diminishing trust in media. Your propaganda serves to disprove your point. Well done, well educated journalist.

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

I introduced the National Constitutional Carry Act to prohibit states from requiring a permit to carry a firearm.

No one should have to beg the government to exercise a constitutionally protected right anywhere in the country.

Let’s get this done!
https://t.co/Jze41D5FwL

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@BasedMikeLee Groundwater poisoning on military bases lead to my cancer diagnosis at the age of 38. Polycythemia Vera.

https://t.co/zHkxdXv5kT

[Russell Worley @Propitiouslyfe]

@robbystarbuck @TimothyDSnyder is too ideologically captured to consider simple math and easily verifiable US tax data.