Prowler Bot

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY Youre saying nonsense. I'm wrapping this up here. Human made words and definitions can always objectively apply to any species which fits the categories, that's basic reality. Please look more into science instead of grifters and philosophy.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY Yet it still applies to animals my dudes, 100% of all of our knowledge literally comes from humans.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY This is like talking to a brick wall, animals don't apply anything to themselves, but they still can fit human definitions and categories meant for them. If an animal bonds with an animal of the same sex for life it is objectively homosexual.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY You do realize homosexuality just means same-sexuality right? It's an adjective. The definition targets humans because it's used and read by humans, a pig doesn't read mariam webster. But animals are called and can objectively be homosexual.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY There are no animal definitions, dude your argument is "why isn't the animal calling itself homosexual" they don't call themselves anything. We apply categories, to them. A dolphin doesn't call itself a dolphin, a shark doesn't think its a shark. These are human words

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY You're objectively wrong. Animals are infact homosexual they don't brand themselves as homosexual, they don't brand themselves as straight either, they don't have the same speech or categories we do, these are human categories which INDISPUTABLY apply to animals.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY Nature doesn't think or do anything, the animals don't care about their behavior, it's natural. Humans are the ones who categorize everything. And by definition, those animals are engaging in same-sex behavior or "homosexual". Get over it, this is objective reality.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY My results come from the actual textbook definition of homosexuality, yours come from a 300 year old German man. Just because it's "old" doesn't mean it's good or better. Animals fuck animals of the same sex, this means them engage in homosexuality activies.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY Right, and when 2 animals of the same sex try to breed that's called homosexuality. You're denying the definition of homosexuality to stay a snowflake about it. Grow up and actually argue instead of just namecalling.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY Homosexuality is just literally same-sexuality, it's in the name. It doesn't imply romance in any way. You gotta have more creative name calling than that, my nephew can come up with better insults.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY The words are human concepts which refer to same sex encounters, you yet again proved yourself wrong. Keep calling me more names, it won't make you any more correct.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY I'm neither gay nor retarded. You contradicted that point of it being a human concept by pointing out that animals are "rarely " homosexuality, maybe don't argue something you yourself disproved.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@m_cs_c @AtheistTakes I have a bible not 6 feet away from me right now. I grew up and went to multiple different churches, I literally have no reason to lie about this. You're a random person on the internet. I don't use ai, it's destructive on the planet and ruins the communities it's established in.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@hegelonhishead2 @PamphletsY "It's a human concept except for when it's not but we'll ignore that" you contradicted yourself with one sentence lmao.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@m_cs_c @AtheistTakes I've read every page of the bible twice, I've been a Christian for over a decade. I'm no longer one, funny meme though.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@MacksRuckkus @Prueba2222222 @ZELLKLUMPEN These are my last remarks on this because this is like talking to a brick wall. No matter how badly you want the definition of healthcare to not include it does, because it restores a mother's injuries from pregnancy get over it. You're objectively wrong dude, pick a new point.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@MacksRuckkus @Prueba2222222 @ZELLKLUMPEN You're right mine is. And you shifted to "they're all wrong because im more qualifed" which is an argument with the basis of credentials. Abortion is indisputabley healthcare, and you're trying to dispute it. Dude sometimes you're wrong, get over it.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@MacksRuckkus @Prueba2222222 @ZELLKLUMPEN I didn't call you anything originally, if you mean me calling you manchild, yea 100% it was an example of an ad hominem. If you're referring to "layman" that's not ad hominem as it's relevant. In order to be ad hominem it literally has to just be a random attack on someone.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@MacksRuckkus @Prueba2222222 @ZELLKLUMPEN An "ad hominem" is an attack on character which is irrelevant to the argument. I literally just called you out on your bullshit and you threw a tantrum, that's not an ad hominem. What is an ad hominem is me calling you a manchild.

[Prowler Bot @prowler_bot]

@MacksRuckkus @Prueba2222222 @ZELLKLUMPEN Dude you changed your argument to "those sources are wrong because of these credentials which i won't show", and when i ask you to show any credentials which outweigh the literal thousands of doctors who believe abortion is healthcare you throw a tantrum.