🚨Content Warning: Deeply disturbing video of a mother screaming “I hate you” at her own newborn.
Congratulations, social media. You found a new way to monetize a woman screaming hatred at a newborn.
Outrage pays.
Shock pays.
The child pays.
Funny how that works....
This will not stop until the platforms stop acting shocked that their own trash machine keeps serving up mothers raging at infants like it is just another recipe reel. They let it rip through feeds because weak-willed women will watch it, internalize it, and start treating a baby like an emotional punching bag with a pulse. Then the comment section does its little dance. “She’s struggling.” “Be kind.” “Mental health.” Yes. Wonderful. The infant should take notes and wait its turn.
Mental illness can be real. Using a newborn as the target of it is still grotesque. Filming it is worse. Circulating it for likes is the part everyone pretends not to understand. Social media is not a witness. It is the delivery service. It takes a private collapse and turns it into a trend for people who confuse “honest” with “I hate this baby.”
And spare the cheap civics lecture. Filming abuse toward a child is not free speech. Anyone who thinks a camera pointed at a baby being screamed at is some noble First Amendment moment is a low IQ retard hiding behind a slogan. You do not get to record a child’s mistreatment, blast it across the internet, and then play constitutional scholar when people want it stopped.
This will not stop until society stops nodding along like well-trained spectators and start saying no, out loud, without the usual apology tour. Soft lectures do not protect a child who cannot crawl away from the camera. If a woman is in a genuine psychiatric crisis, she needs help and the baby needs to be pulled out of the blast radius. That is not complicated. That is the bare minimum. Everything else is theater.
A baby is not a prop. A baby is not a therapist. A baby is not content. If your first instinct after watching a mother scream hatred into a newborn’s face is to debate her feelings, you have already chosen the wrong victim.
Stop making excuses for the woman in the video. Stop pretending the platform is innocent for blasting it into millions of homes. Stop acting like silence is neutrality. A child is being used as the target, and every adult in the room who shrugs is helping it happen. Protect the child first. The rest of you can sort out your feelings later.
You’ve been lied to about Lindsay Clancy, she wasn’t some struggling mom, she was very privileged
“The 8 month old baby was born. The 3 and 5 year old were in daycare full-time. Patrick took a 12 week paternity leave, and they hired a nanny to help with the newborn baby. After the 12 week leave was over, Patrick could see that Lindsay needed more help and support, so he decided to move his office into home and started working from home.
So they decided they didn't need the nanny anymore because Patrick was gonna stay home, and you guys are saying that this woman had no support? That is false.
A key factor that you guys are missing of this whole entire thing, and you're letting this woman play on your emotions, she was a labor and delivery nurse herself. She was in this career path. Lindsay knew, she knew, if I tell my doctors that I am hearing voices and having thoughts of harming my children, they're going to be taken away from me. She knew that. She is smart, she's calculated, and this was premeditated.
Any woman going through actual psychosis, especially with the career path she was in, being very educated on this, she would have gone to her doctors and said, "I need them away from me because I think I'm gonna kill them." She didn't do that.
Why? Because she wanted the opportunity to kill her three kids. She Googled how to kill. She Googled how long it would take Patrick to go from the house to the restaurant. She murdered one child. Patrick called. She missed the call. She called back after killing one child and said, "We're good here. Everything's fine. We're fine."’
She also gives an excellent medicine breakdown on how there is no way she was actually in the state of mind she claims to be
“You guys are letting a very smart and calculated woman manipulate you and play on your emotions, and it's working, and a jury really might let her walk because… it's scary”
And now we have a mistrial….
The only correction here is the children were in preschool not daycare but either way they were not in the home and being attended to at preschool 3 and a half days a week. The callback after the first murder is speculation but she 100% did call Patrick back after he called her. Showing she was definitely not in some psychosis
Lindsay Clancy was very privileged. Her husband is estimated to make between $258,000-$482,000 per year based on his job and Glassdoor salaries
John Battaglia killed his two daughters in a case forensic psychologists linked to psychosis stemming from bipolar disorder.
The jury took just 19 minutes to deliberate.
He was executed in Texas in 2018.
She had a dream of the perfect husband and a baby girl. She was granted that dream.
Now, she tells TikTok that she is full of rage because her baby girl “is a parasite” who has sucked every bit of joy and freedom out of her life.
@timeofthemeow What's wrong with playing XBOX while my girl pushing a baby out her butt? Is the baby coming out my butt? Is there some rule that that allows me to pause a multiplayer game because my girl pregnant? Not defending miscegenation, but leave XBOX out of it; we all love Call of Duty.
It happened again...
Corie A. Walsh, a mother in Illinois, was arrested and charged with the m*rder of her 2-year-old son after a neighbor found the child in the basement of the home.
Witnesses say that Walsh was "heavily invested" in the Lindsay Clancy trial and was debating it over text just hours before the m*rder occurred.