This is Valion. This is who live-streamed Austin’s friends leaving the courthouse and followed them to their car.
He works for Motorola as a camera investigator. @MotorolaUS
This is the woman who started the trend of having Black people call Chinese restaurants to place orders and never pick them up in retaliation to Rick Chow being acquitted.
She works for Hewlett-Packard.
Do you think we should call Hewlett Packard, and ask them how they feel?
There’s literally nothing weird about Thomas Matthew Crooks emailing a deputy from Butler, PA before the assassination attempt. It’s not weird that he practiced shooting at the same range Homeland Security used. It’s not weird that the local police and Secret Service spotted Crooks with a rangefinder, photographed him, and texted about him for over an hour and still let him climb the roof with a rifle. It’s not weird that the Secret Service wasn’t flying drones that day, but Crooks was. It’s not weird that Butler was the first Trump rally of the year with Secret Service anti-sniper agents on the roofs. It’s not weird that Crooks’ house looked like a sterile lab with no trash or silverware. And it’s not weird that his body was cremated ten days later before Congress could see it. This is like when people say the CIA was shadowing Oswald before he, and he alone, shot JFK.
The Carroll case rested on a sequence of legal maneuvers with no precedent in American civil litigation. Democratic legislators passed a retroactive temporary law eliminating the statute of limitations for decades-old accusations that could not be dated, located, or defended with alibis. The day the temporary law took effect, Carroll filed her pre-prepared lawsuit, the first in the state to do so.
A Democratic mega-donor secretly funded the plaintiff’s legal costs through a nonprofit. The arrangement stayed hidden until one of Trump’s lawyers discovered it. A Clinton-appointed judge then sealed all records so the jury never learned the billionaire backer had publicly committed to Trump’s political destruction. Every participant in the legislative, funding, and judicial steps operated inside the same political network, and each decision produced the same cumulative result.
The jury explicitly checked “no” on the verdict form’s specific rape question. The judge ruled rape proven anyway, claiming the jury had used a common rather than statutory definition… an impossibility, since their rejection under the common definition precludes rape by any standard. Trump’s team was barred from arguing innocence before a second jury, which awarded $83.3 million ($65 million punitive) on the rape finding the first jury had rejected.
A defendant was sued for defamation over denying an accusation, prevented from asserting that denial as a defense, tried before a judge who concealed the plaintiff’s political funding, and hit with a nine-figure verdict built on facts the jury itself refused to find.
No comparable sequence exists in recorded U.S. civil litigation history.
Did you know...
E Jean Carroll has claimed that almost A DOZEN people have attempted to r*pe her?
Including her:
- Babysitter’s boyfriend
- Dentist
- Camp counselor
-Unnamed college date
-Unnamed boss
AND
CBS chief executive Les Moonves
So ya... She's credible.
NEVER GONNA SEE A DIME!!
The most devastating blow to Carroll’s narrative isn’t even the missing date or the convenient absence of witnesses, it’s the sheer physical impossibility of the act she describes.
We are asked to suspend the laws of physics, human anatomy, and common sense to accommodate a story that reads more like pulp fiction (she wrote a book on what dogs taught her about sex) than a forensic account of a crime. When you strip away the emotional rhetoric and examine the cold mechanics of the alleged assault, the scenario collapses under the weight of its own logistical absurdities.
Carroll claims she was wearing a coat dress and tights. She alleges that Trump, a large man, pinned her against a hard surface, a dressing room wall, using his shoulder or body weight to incapacitate her. While maintaining this pin against a woman she claims was actively fighting, stomping on his feet, and pushing him away, Trump supposedly managed to perform a series of complex physical maneuvers that would require the dexterity of a magician and the grip of a vice.
We are to believe that with one hand potentially occupied pinning her or managing her upper body, he successfully reached under a heavy coat dress and pulled down tight-fitting hosiery. Anyone familiar with the material of tights knows they are restrictive and difficult to maneuver even under calm conditions... pulling them down partially, just enough to allow access but not removing them, while the wearer is struggling is mechanically improbable.
Simultaneously, Trump would have had to manage his own clothing, unzipping trousers, navigating underwear, and achieving the necessary anatomical alignment for penetration, all while keeping a struggling victim pinned flat against a vertical surface. This scenario effectively requires the assailant to have three hands... one to pin the victim, one to manage her complex layers of clothing, and one to manage his own. The geometry simply does not hold up. Sexual assault is violent and chaotic, it is not a choreographed stunt where clothing magically parts and bodies align instantly amidst a struggle. To accept this account is to ignore the reality of physical conflict in favor of a fabricated narrative that fails the most basic test of realism.
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
Jill Biden is pure evil.
This is her after the debate.
Now she’s claiming she thought Joe had a stroke.
But she stayed on stage to trash Trump after Joe had a stroke?
It was all about power for Jill.
Nothing was off the table for her. Nothing too low.
This is Anthony Coleman.
Anthony didn’t like his pizza so he threw it in the delivery driver’s face.
Anthony then went to the store, left his two toddlers in the car, and went inside to assault the same driver.
Blaxx and violence. Like a moth to a flame.
Six years ago today, 911 callers reported a White female being abducted by Black males during the Minneapolis BLM riots.
A White female in her 30s was later found murdered inside an abandoned car.
Media and police instantly scuttled the story and her name was never released.