Cool. Every American who has had a loved one murdered or raped by a Mexican who entered illegally should immediately pursue legal action against Mexico.
I want answers too, to questions like “how the hell is an illegal alien able to operate his own construction company in a country where you can get debanked for offensive speech”
Turkey Tom’s videos made it undeniably clear that Lance brain raped Tyler into a deep depressive psychosis driving him to psychopathy and eventually murder.
Commies rely on you being a decent person who plays by the rules while they denigrate you
Demanding you follow your principles to a T while they subvert them to conquer you
The GOP has not enacted total commie removal from positions of power, so they are playing a losing game
Reminder that she had zero gaming experience when she was promoted to run Xbox, and she has zero finance or economic experience now that she's promoted to advise the Federal Reserve. Her one function is to purge white Americans and replace them with Indian cheap foreign labor.
This is the end result of the left going after people's kids. We should track down every influence in Tyler Robinson's life from his professors, to his discord contacts, to his trans friend group.
Build a profile of how a normal kid from a normal healthy Republican household left home and within a year was carrying out the worst assassination in our country's history since JFK.
All of them need to be held accountable alongside Robinson.
“Heh, sorry Trump, but we reheard your case and birth tourism is still legal. Nothing personnel kid.”
“Again.”
“What?”
“Hear it again”
“B-but we already made our decisi-”
“Again. Now.”
If Candace Owens was actually saying something that the powers that be didn't like she wouldn't have a massive youtube channel. That shit would have been nuked immediately. The fact that she has been allowed to operate freely and even promoted when others are banned, debanked, and kicked off the internet means that she is a tool of the establishment.
I've discovered that the MAJORITY of indian & south asian sex predators are reported as being White. Law enforcement is deliberately hiding indian and paki sex crimes.
PATTERN OF DISCRIMINATION
The SAME female Fort Worth cop who recently threatened to ticket Christian preachers for "offensive" speech stopped other Christians from attending a Pride event in 2025
She also threatened potential arrests for using "offensive" speech.
This cop is discriminating against Christians and infringing on 1st Amendment rights.
She needs to be FIRED
@JohnDoyle Lots of people are afraid of pissing off an army of schizos, slop opera adict winemoms, and bots, because they think "ratios" are real and meaningful. Quite embarrassing.
I basically permanently do not give a shit about the opinion of anyone who hasn’t spoken out against this. It’s made me wonder if when they speak into microphones to remind people that it’s bad to cut kids’ dicks off, they do it just to play the role of the Good Guy. I’m sure they agree with it, but curiously their signature combination of courage and morality is absent while we’re all witnessing literally the most unbelievable and prolonged display of evil to ever occur in The Space. I suspect they’re just waiting for it to be over so they can go back to Just Telling It Like It Is™.
Thank you, Chungus Moralman #7. You are very brave.
I like it when my enemy is eager to die. That means he and I have the same goal.
Islam has been trying to invade the West since Anno Domini 711.
And the West's great weakness has never been unwillingness to die. When the guardians of the West had to die to defend Europe, they faced death willingly. More of them in antiquity, less of them today, but ability to absorb causalities has never been our problem and never will be.
Our problem is not unwillingness to die. Our problem is unwillingness to kill.
This is why the current Muslim invasion of Europe is leaving its AK47s at home.
It's a tactic. They have discovered that rifles are a liability, and they are better off without them.
Why?
Because the rifle increases our willingness to kill them more than it increases their ability to kill us.
The tactics have changed, but the war is the same.
We're not at war with Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, ISIS, Al-Shabaab or JNIM. We're at war with Islam.
It's the same war we've been waging since 711. They want to kill, enslave, or forcibly convert us, and we don't want that.
That's what a war is, guys.
You may not like that. Doesn't matter. We are not talking about what "should" be. We are talking about what is.
We don't get decide or not if we are at war with Islam, because Muslims have decided they are at war with us.
We are better at fighting wars than they are. Because we are better at hurting people than they are. So if we are willing to hurt them, we win.
If we continue trying to not-hurt them, we lose. Because that's not how you fight a war.
It really is that simple.
You called Charlie Kirk a “demon possessed” fake Christian right before he died.
You’re intentionally stirring controversy over the murder of a man you publicly hated because you think it will help promote your personal brand.
You are a walking indictment of the 19th amendment. Fuck off you evil bitch.
"Did you hear? ICE killed another American!"
"A citizen?"
"Well, no. But he had been here for 35 years."
"So he wasn't supposed to be here. Still, that's not a death sentence. What happened?"
"ICE shot him!"
"An ICE agent just walked up to him and shot him?"
"Well, no. He hit an ICE vehicle and started to run down the ICE agent."
"So he tried to kill an ICE agent."
A statement that can only be made by the historically ignorant.
Before Christians took over the Roman Empire, it was normal for Roman parents to dispose of unwanted babies (of which were mostly daughters) by simply dumping them on trash heaps. This was a practice known as 'exposure'. If babies didn't outright die, they'd be picked up by brothel owners or slavers to be turned into products for profit.
Many Christians adopted these unwanted children as their own. Because many of these children were girls, and because the conditions they grew up in weren't very fortunate, early Christianity developed a reputation for being a religion for women and poor people.
It wouldn't be until Christian Emperors like Constantine that the practice of exposure was finally equated to murder.
So yes, Christians did invent most of what we know as "Basic Human Morality" as we know it today. You stand on the shoulders of giants but are too arrogant to look down and see where your feet are planted.
In terms of owning slaves and wanting abolition, for Thomas Jefferson it actually was a very principled and well thought out set of beliefs. Once you really dig into what he believed it makes complete and total sense why he both held slaves and believed in the abolition of slavery. Essentially, Jefferson inherited this system which began before he was born.
He believed that slavery was wrong, that they should be free. However, Jefferson also believed that they were so fundamentally different from Americans down to their very nature as well as due to the history between our two groups that we could never coexist in a way as equals under the same government. Thus, slavery had to be maintained until an actual solution could be found.
The solution he arrived at was then to work on gradual abolition combined with subsequent deportation from the United States to their own country. This is also why Liberia exists. Slavery was an inherited problem which could not be dealt with simply by freeing them all, as it would produce endless societal convulsions which would never be possible to correct by giving them citizenship. Once you understand this, it now makes a whole lot of sense why he owned slaves and believed in the abolition of slavery.
There were no massive contradictions of "unprincipled exceptions." That is a complete myth created later to impose modern views of egalitarianism onto the founders they never themselves held. That is where the actual contradiction lies. It is a contradiction between modern American beliefs and the beliefs of those the founders held, not on the founders themselves. Here is what Thomas Jefferson believed:
"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers." - Thomas Jefferson
That is a totally consistent set of views, beliefs, and actions he took. Believing that they are inconsistent is actually an anachronistic reading and imposing modern views onto the past. "All men are created equal" simply does not mean what you think it does. That itself was a crafted and controlled narrative made well after the 18th century.