Your team isn’t losing to competitors.
They’re losing to hesitation, bad intel, and dead docs.
I built @PlaywiseHQ so your team can stop bleeding winnable deals
The new Claude Code post-mortem proves @theo was right. Anthropic employees never noticed the performance degradation because they aren't dog-fooding the same product shipped to the rest of us.
@bcherny@ReadySetBrian Seeing how Anthropic haven't addressed the overwhelmingly neg response to Opus 4.7 I can't help but think they actually want to lose individual users.
I used to love working in CC, now it just feels like a chore.
@menesekinci_ai Ok I'll test again later when my current session resets, but I didn't expect to hit 16% utilization with one fairly straight forward prompt. 🤞 the limits are actually usable.
@jasondeanlee Hit 16% current usage limit with one prompt (small review and refactor) with Opus 4.5. It looks like its unusable for the real world. Switched back to Sonnet 4.5 and will test Gemini Pro 3 later this week.
@sir4K_zen@trq212 I hit 16% usage of Opus 4.5 for a small review and refactor. So on that basis 4 - 5 prompts and I would hit my Current Session limit, which is exactly what made Opus 4.1 unusable for the real world as well. I don't know if the limit is actually improved.
@JoRoan@BenBajarin Have you tried 4.5? I have hit 16% Current Session usage with one prompt (small review and refactor), so I'm not getting my hopes up that there is any actual change to the rate limit here.
@enricoros@AnthropicAI Are you actually seeing changes to the limits? I made one prompt (small review and refactor) using the new default Opus 4.5 model at hit 16% Current Session usage immediately?
@jkudish@Anthropic Are limit changes actually true? I updated CC and one prompt on the new default Opus 4.5 model and I'm at 16% of Current Session usage. This is the same as what I saw previously, making Opus models unusable for real world users.