Piotr

As of this moment, I am dead. I go into battle to reclaim my life. This I do gladly, for I am Peter. Victory is Life

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

Healhy hahaha... best to unfollow this advise moron. Even done with olive oil they put it on this seara pre produced chicken LOL. According to grok Ingredients: Chicken wing coxinha, wheat flour enriched with iron and folic acid, water (8.6%), vegetable oil*, modified starch (1.6%), salt, sugar, soy protein (0.2%), garlic, onion, cumin, turmeric, parsley, corn protein (0.1%), low-sodium salt, natural flavors (yeast, paprika, garlic, onion, sage), stabilizer (sodium triphosphate), raising agents (sodium bicarbonate, disodium diphosphate), antioxidant (sodium erythorbate), thickener (xanthan gum). OMG

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@TheProjectUnity If this would happend for real there would be 100 of videos not only one source. I stopped watching videos when it is single one. Everyone has a camera in their hands. Such spectacle high in the sky is in visual range of 10000+ people with phones. Single these days means fake.

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

TL;DR: Watched it and .. zero hard evidence, only "I saw it but can’t show you" stories. Film is 69x fear/threat vs 48x wonder/curiosity (Grok counted the transcript). Feels like classic fear-porn to justify more black-budget money, not genuine disclosure. Super disappointed.

Full rant:
Just watched it, and honestly, I'm walking away more skeptical than ever. It promises big revelations about government cover-ups, crash retrievals, and non-human intelligence, but delivers zero hard evidence—just a parade of anecdotes and opinions. Stuff like "I've seen non-human craft but it's classified" or "My colleague told me about alien bodies." No photos, no data, no verifiable proof. It feels like a echo chamber of insiders patting each other on the back without showing the goods.

What bugs me most is the total lack of scientific curiosity or fascination. Instead of celebrating this as the ultimate wonder—proof we're not alone in the vast universe, a paradigm shift that could unite humanity and spark endless exploration—the film hammers on fear. Everything's framed as a "national security threat" or "existential risk," with pilots dodging near-misses and UAPs messing with nukes. Where's the awe? The excitement about advanced tech or other life forms? It makes me think: shouldn't we be curious and inspired, not just paranoid?

I asked Grok to analyze the transcript, and the stats back this up: 69 mentions of threats, risks, or national security concerns, versus only 48 on curiosity, existence of non-human life, or the "biggest discovery in history." That's a clear bias toward alarmism over wonder. Grok also pointed out how the film's based on real programs like AATIP and whistleblowers like Elizondo and Grusch, but their claims rely on hearsay—no empirical data. Skeptics like Michael Shermer call it out as opinion-heavy with no substance, and even NASA says there's no ET proof yet.

To me, this screams fiction, disinformation, or a manipulation play for more funding. Why push the "threat" narrative so hard? Maybe to justify bigger budgets for defense contractors or distract from real issues like advanced drones. It's 2025—time for real disclosure, not hype. What do you think? Is this legit or just another psyop?

I also asked ChatGPT to go through the full transcript of The Age of Disclosure in a “computer-like” way and look for where the film talks about:
UAPs as a threat (words like threat, danger, national security, weapons, war, safety, risk),
versus UAPs as a source of curiosity / discovery (phrases like we are not alone, universe, discovery, learn, explore, life out there, wonder).

According to ChatGPT’s rough count (counting lines of dialogue, not minutes of screen time):
about 146 lines use explicit threat / security language,
about 51 lines use curiosity / discovery / “we are not alone” language.

So roughly:
They talk about UAPs as a “threat / national security / war” issue ~3 times more often
than they talk about them as “a wonder / discovery that we are not alone.”

Examples of “threat / security” lines from the film:
“…are a potential national security threat.”
“…present serious national security concerns and a potential existential threat.”
“This now became a safety issue.”
“…and activated nuclear weapons.”

Examples of “curiosity / wonder / discovery” lines:
“We are not only not alone in the universe, but we have been discovered…”
“There’s evidence we are not alone.”
“This is the biggest discovery…”
“Forms of life out there in the universe.”

So the feeling I had while watching – that the film is mostly trying to scare me rather than inspire curiosity – is backed up by ChatGPT’s transcript analysis.
#UFO #UAP #Disclosure #Skepticism #AlienLife

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@PlanetOfMemes @EndWokeness Out of the gun into the sun :) - Futurama :)

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@AbbottEddi5270 @JonStewartIL Well, if you say it is legit, it must be legit. Please remind us how you proved the authenticity of this video.

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

People got triggered, and you’re happy, milking the same thing for years. Now nobody cares about your fake video, so you come up with new claims about Rogan without any proof. And when people finally find this airplane at the bottom of the ocean, you’ll say, “They teleported it back into the water”, and the new milk will start to flow. Joe will invite the search crew for a nice conversation, and you’ll still say that he’s an idiot. He just has a good nose for bullshitters.

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@JonDoeNotMatter @Cromwell585162 @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight Educate me , please

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

Well, even those scientists didn’t seem super excited… everything sounded sketchy. It was like: “Well, we cannot explain it any other way, so it must be life.”

Statistically, this had been predictable for a long time, it just hadn’t been confirmed yet. So in the end, it’s only a validation of many existing theories.

And, well… it isn’t gray, it doesn’t have 18 tentacles, and it doesn’t have huge black eyes.

And also, many people who are actually trying to mislead you, while insisting they’re telling the truth or try to hide something,often overemphasize things like: “WE ARE ULTRA-TRANSPARENT,” “WE’RE TRYING TO BE VERY TRANSPARENT,” or “I JUST WANT TO REITERATE: WE ARE GOING TO BE TRANSPARENT.” .
Especially “WE’RE TRYING” it sounds as if it’s harder than flying to Mars.

Don’t you think that’s strange?

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@NASAMars NASA presentation smelled a little fishy :)

....AND ALSO, WE ARE ULTRATRANSPARENT...

....WE'RE TRYING TO BE VERY TRANSPARENT...

...I WANT TO JUST REITERATE, WE ARE GOING TO BE TRANSPARENT...

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@naija4lifen @NASAMars Yeah, but it is already dead. :)

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@etipsbellu5443 @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight They actually measured this it was "supa fast"

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@JonDoeNotMatter @Cromwell585162 @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight I am proud of my self, yesterday i had none :) This increase cannot be even calculated in percentage. That is amazing.

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@GEMM1NT10 @AlmadaHarry @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight Sorry i forgot that under ocean is a shell of big tutrle :)

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@paul_artisan @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight Ahh yes debunked video with sprite from a game. Yes this could be the same. You are rigth

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@AlmadaHarry @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight And remind me what is the speed of this ufo over ground?

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@farmhousefreak @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight Hehe. You must be talking from your own experience :)

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@Cromwell585162 @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight You just confirmed your knowledge. Hehe. EOT

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@Cromwell585162 @RepEricBurlison @GOPoversight First verify your account then open your mouth dear bot. Large on your screen ? Make a window smaller it will become smaller genius.

[Piotr @PwitterPwit]

@TheProjectUnity Source is crappy channel??? You lost it completely. Poor decision.