@Pauloo_0x95 did exactly the same, bought 61, sold 53 after IMO the 4h trend was lost, without looking at divs etc, but saw the bear trap and jumped in sub 60 again. We all do this, just go again mate
@KyleSamani don't worry mate, you can just go and trade it on @DeriveXYZ , but it's running on @HyperliquidX so that might be a bit spicy for your blood
@EmporosResearch@grok Is that genuinely die only argument/insult you can think of π€£.
I feel so fucking sorry for anyone that ever has to read through the AI proofread slop of an article that you might release.
Thanks for accepting defeat, till next time nerd.
@EmporosResearch@grok You really are a sad little man when you run a "research account" and you can't even get a reply from grok. Have fun staying poor "AnALySt"
@EmporosResearch You see there mate, here is where your excellent analysis falls apart. Comparing hype to either of those is not only telling of your intelligence but far more of your judgement. Good luck, I wish you nothing but the best.
@EmporosResearch Mate. I don't take the time to formulate a *coherent argument because you ain't worth it. You stated: "buybacks prop the bid until insider vesting unloads into it". They unstaked less than 10% of what they are allocated to, so your argument, much like your spelling, is dog shit.
@Stefan_B_Trades mate, there was no 81 you dipshit. The highest price anywhere was 75 and you're so fucking perma bearish constantly, very much doubt you long anything
@spikegoesrawr_@swansonbenson0 You fucking twat. It takes literally one search on any single search engine, let alone just going to the docs to read this : The team's (Core Contributors) direct allocation is 23.8% of the total 1B HYPE supply, or 238 million HYPE".
But continue coping and being poor