Yesterday, I was tuned in for a few webinars based on cybersecurity & AI, here are a few things that caught my attention that I said back in 2016+ mostly about cybersecurity but I will add my thoughts about the AI 🧵
I was already aware of the AI agent vs AI agent scenario.
It may or may not happen on a business level.
Perhaps think on the level of nation state sponsored type of attacks.
Well.. this happened with Hugging Face.
Thousands of automated actions, running undetected over a weekend, by an end to end autonomous AI agent.
https://t.co/dnXZi71yAu
Malware can sit on a system networks for months and can go undetected.
What would happen if the same applies here with a AI agent that goes undetected and starts scanning the system network?
Then it executes the infiltration by targeting and overwriting the code.
I can’t believe I am agreeing with Thomson Reuters here.
The law profession/legal industry is going through it with AI (hallucinations/outputs etc.), as they once did with cybersecurity.
I’m going to say that businesses will be going through this as well.
"Almost right" is not good enough.
Not when AI outputs are influencing legal judgments, financial disclosures, regulatory filings, or client advice. In the moments that matter, results must be accurate, transparent, and verifiable under real-world scrutiny.
“Or would you rather see it all crash down, and try to rebuild something better from the rubble?”
I want the economy & the financial system to collapse, we can’t be running on a fiat monetary system, it’s running out of fumes. Sometimes I am thinking how is even holding up the way that it is.
We are no where near for a AI job take over, even if companies are saying that the layoffs are due to that, in my mind I just wonder if they have a good system in place for the AI.
In regard to these women and built a skincare business, from my research they are making money and tons of it.
Where the economy is at and where the men on this app is saying that women should be at home, well step up and be the provider then, men are lacking in this area, that’s why you see women out there working building businesses.
Introducing Daybreak: frontier AI for cyber defenders.
Daybreak brings together the most capable OpenAI models, Codex, and our security partners to accelerate cyber defense and continuously secure software.
A step toward a future where security teams can move at the speed defense demands.
Unless businesses are going complete offsite, remote work, in which some businesses are pushing for onsite work.
Server networks are going to exist, AI based malware will live on the server until it wants to execute.
A software based AI, will not save an organization that has server networks on site, firewalls etc.
Anyone that thinks it will save businesses, it’s a pipe dream.
It is interesting because this is what businesses are going to face with AI hallucinations, there is already a AI bias lawsuit case.
There is no regulatory fine at the moment for AI hallucinations/bias as there is for cyber privacy data breaches.
It’s very interesting to see all these AI hallucinations cases unfold.
We are just in the beginning of it, if lawyers are not paying attention and not checking throughly, what are the secure measures that they have on the AI?
Another Westlaw CoCounsel hallucination case:
“Attorney Webb acknowledged reading the Thompson Reuters disclaimer about the accuracy of the CoCounsel AI tool, but emphasized that the sales representative stated there was "no way" the program could produce hallucinations.” 👀
@BowTiedPhRaptor Yes, I agree, it’s like the Mobley v. Workday AI bias lawsuit.
3rd party provider should be doing their updates on their end & law firms should be doing the due diligence on that.