QuarkChain

A Fully Decentralized L2 Delivering Unmatched Scalability, Security, and On-Chain Verifiable Storage - The Ultimate Infrastructure for AI and dApps.

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

🚀 Introducing the Super World Computer: Shaping the Future of Web3 🚀
QuarkChain unveils a next-gen Layer 2 built on OP Stack to tackle key Web3 challenges:
✅ Soul Gas Token for true mass Web2 user onboarding
✅ EthStorage as L3 for scalable storage
✅ web3:// for fully decentralized apps
✅ Parallel EVM for performance boosts
✅ Advanced fault-proof algorithms

We’ve also secured 4 Grants from Optimism, further accelerating our innovations!
Plus, check out updates on our roadmap, development progress, and exciting community events designed to get everyone involved!

Dive into the full details here 👉 https://t.co/Lu07zHzeRY

#SuperWorldComputer #QuarkChain #GalxeQuest #SWC #QKC #OPGrants

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Our dev @qzhodl shares his take on the L1/L2 fee-sharing debate, and explains why getting Ethereum L1 a fair cut of L2 revenue is less about how much users pay, and more about whether L1 has any real mechanism to enforce that cut in the first place.

Read more below 👇

[qzhodl @qzhodl]

聊一下 L1 向 L2 收取 10%~20% 手续费这件事，在技术上会遇到哪些困难。

把问题拆成"用户费用高低"和"L1/L2 分配比例"两件事，这个框架我很认同。想从工程角度补充一个视角：不是该不该收，而是现有机制下怎么收。

一个自然的思路是：L2 用 L1 的方式很特殊：提交 state root 和发 DA batch，能不能针对这两种用法单独定价？

先看 state root。它就是一笔普通的合约调用，走通用 gas 计价。协议层想加价，得先识别"这是一笔 rollup 结算交易"，但执行层看到的只有字节和 opcode，没有语义。即便硬编码针对某些合约地址收高价，换一层 proxy 大概率就绕过去了。何况 state root 本身很小、频次很低，加价十倍的绝对值也起不来。

再看 DA。blob 是专门为 rollup 开的通道，天然可识别，理论上可以控制供给抬价。但 DA 已经是竞争市场：Orbit、OP Stack、Polygon CDK 都把 AnyTrust、Celestia、EigenDA 做成了配置项，切换成本不高。以太坊实际走的也是反方向：4844、Pectra、Fusaka 一路主动扩容压低价格，用低价换主流 rollup 留在自己的安全域内。份额是赢了，但 DA 这个品类也很难再承载"抽成"的期望。

更结构性的问题是：按比例分配的前提是 L1 能看到 L2 的收入，但 sequencer 的收入发生在 L2 自己的账本上，L1 既无可见性也无强制力。对比 Arbitrum 那 10% 是怎么收到的：Expansion Program 本质是许可协议，靠法律合同和品牌授权来 enforce。而 Ethereum 和 L2 之间是 permissionless 的，没有合同、没有可吊销的授权，这可能才是"比例"最难落地的地方。

所以我的理解是：方向（L1 拿到更合理的份额）和技术现实之间，缺的是一个执行机制。现有收费模型只卖两种商品：gas 和 blob，都按市场出清价结算，里面没有"比例"这个旋钮。想真正改变分配，恐怕要等协议层的结构性变化，比如 native rollup / based sequencing 把排序权和收入拉回 L1。在那之前，0.15% 与其说是定价失误，不如说是这套机制的必然输出。

大家对“应该多收”的分歧不大，真正的分歧在“用什么机制收”。

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

From Beam Chain to Lean Ethereum, Ethereum has chosen a path of radical research, conservative delivery.

As @VitalikButerin notes, gas limit increases will happen many times over the next few years — and each step depends on client optimization.

That's where our work on parallel EVM execution comes in.

This thread by QuarkChain's dev @qzhodl lays out the past two years of this evolution clearly 👇

[qzhodl @qzhodl]

聊一下 Lean Ethereum 这两年的演变。

这个概念最早叫 Beam Chain，是 Justin Drake 在 24 年 Devcon（曼谷）上提出的。当时这个 talk 提前很久就在预热，号称是以太坊共识层的下一次重大升级，我正好在现场，可以说是整个 Devcon 最火爆的一场。核心内容是：抗量子 + 更快的 finality + 共识层 SNARK 化（zkVM）。而且因为 Beacon Chain 五年下来积累了不少技术债，方案是不在现有客户端上改，而是从零开发全新的共识客户端。

后来因为 "Beam" 这个名字有商标的争议，项目被迫改名。25 年 7 月，Justin 借着以太坊十周年把它升级成了 "Lean Ethereum"：不再只是共识层，而是 lean consensus / lean data / lean execution 三条线，覆盖整个 L1 技术栈。原来的 Beam Chain 变成了其中的 lean consensus。这个方向吸引了一批新客户端团队同步开发，比如 Ream (Rust)、Zeam (Zig)、Qlean (C++)、Lantern (C) 等，并且已经在专门的 pq-devnet 上做了好几轮多客户端 interop 测试。我们也在持续跟进，每周参加 Ethereum PQ 的 weekly meeting 了解进展。

最近一个大变化是 Vitalik 发了这条 post（https://t.co/z9JXag7v6t），给 Lean Ethereum 正式定了性：

它是以太坊的第三次重大迭代——The Merge 是第二次，这次几乎所有主要协议组件都会被替换：recursive STARKs 验证取代重放执行、全面抗量子、共识重构、多维 gas、新的 state 类型等等，但它不再是一次性的大升级，而是未来三到四年通过多个 fork，把规划的功能一点一点集成进主网，尽量不打扰现有应用——路径上更像 The Merge 而不是推倒重来。

Vitalik 还专门提到了 client architecture 会有变化。在我看来，既然走的是"主网渐进式 fork"路线，大概率意味着这些升级最终要落在现有主网客户端上，而不是当年设想的"全新客户端整体替换"。

如果这个判断成立，那当初为 Beam Chain 组建的那批新客户端团队，角色可能会从"未来的主网客户端"转变为"探索和研究的先遣队"——他们在 devnet 上验证过的 PQ 签名、聚合方案、SNARK 化状态转换，会以规范和经验的形式反哺现有客户端团队。这不是白干，而是以太坊一贯的做法：用最激进的方式做研究，用最保守的方式上主网。

回头看这两年，Lean Ethereum 的演变其实是一个很典型的样本：一个宏大的"从零重写"叙事，如何在现实的工程约束和生态惯性中，被逐渐改造成一条渐进但可执行的路径。愿景负责定方向，devnet 负责试错，主网 fork 负责收敛。以太坊的升级从来不是靠某一次革命完成的，而是靠这种"激进研究 + 保守交付"的节奏一步步磨出来的。The Merge 是这样，Lean Ethereum 大概率也会是这样。

[Web3 Warsaw @web3_warsaw]

🌐 Meet our Community Partners for #Web3Warsaw!

🇵🇱 Warsaw, Poland
🎟️ Use Code : WARSAW10
🌐 https://t.co/Q8XSEDvJZk

👇 Follow:
@AragonProject, @PQabelian, @PixelRealmlabs, @ritestream_io, @AetherGamesInc, @AcrossProtocol, @Quark_Chain, @travalacom, @naboxwallet, @quranium_org.

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

pyquarkchain v1.7.0-beta is now available. Help us test! 🚀

This beta brings the QuarkChain mainnet client to Python 3.13, along with a modernized dependency stack, an upgraded native pyethash extension, a new Rocksdict storage backend, expanded test coverage, and AI-assisted code review.

The Docker image is now available, and we're inviting node operators and developers to test it ahead of the official v1.7.0 release.

If you run a node, we'd love to hear your feedback.

📖 Read the full release notes:
https://t.co/KBeRknxyGQ

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Great insights from our team on @ethereum's evolving technical roadmap.

As Ethereum continues advancing scalability, verification, and execution architecture, these innovations bring us closer to realizing the vision of a Super World Computer.

[qzhodl @qzhodl]

Vitalik 把最新的 strawmap 称为以太坊的“第三次技术大迭代”，它是继 PoW 时代、The Merge 之后的第三次。读完最直接的感受是：覆盖之广，几乎重写了协议的每一层。

递归 STARK 的验证与扩容、全面抗量子、共识层把活性与最终性解耦、更短的 slot、多维资源计价、针对状态爆炸的新型 state、把隐私列为一等目标、形式化验证的落地，乃至用 RISC-V 逐步替换 EVM......

这更像是以太坊研究团队最近几年来对区块链认知的一次集大成，选在中期扩容压力缓解之后（Glamsterdam + Hegota）系统性地兑现。

读这份路线图，能强烈感到以太坊社区里那种技术极客驱动、对进步近乎执拗的追求，也能感到他们的雄心。让我想起 Vitalik 之前的话，大意是：希望以太坊始终是一款令人印象深刻的协议，在量子计算、火星探索、强生物技术与 AI 齐头并进的时代里，依然配得上一席之地。

以太坊走到今天十年了，技术体系仍未定型，还在剧烈迭代。有意思的是，Vitalik 说过 strawmap 完成之后架构大体就能稳定下来，往后只需很小的改动。另外 ，EF 的剩余资金可能也不足以支撑这种规模的长期迭代。但换个角度想：随着研究员对区块链的认知继续演进，strawmap 会不会又"不够"了，还要长出新的分支？

这一点，恰好和比特币的技术理念形成鲜明对比：一个把"不断迭代、永远追新"当作生命力，一个把"尽量不变、极致稳定"当作信仰。

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

QuarkChain was featured by @tokenpost, Korea's largest blockchain media.

The article highlights our vision of building the Super World Computer.

📰 Read more: https://t.co/jZaFvtaOZD

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

🔍@TokenPostkr — one of Korea's largest crypto media outlets — recently ran an in-depth feature on QuarkChain as part of their Token Watch Korea series. Worth a read if you're curious about where the project is headed.
🔗 https://t.co/6JEjymdDbq (Korean language)

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

4/
The clearest takeaway across all three: high-volume cross-chain operations need a distributed data path. L1-as-data-plane works for low-volume cases like staking but visibly fails for active rollup ecosystems — and we're watching the L2 world move past it in real time.

🔍 Full analysis → https://t.co/bTjwlnASdA

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

1/ Three systems — @ethereum (staking), @Optimism (rollup bridges), and @Quark_Chain (sharding) — all face the same problem: passing messages between chains that don't share execution state. Their answers are very different.

We walked through each, then compared them along the dimensions that actually differentiate:

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

3/

▶️ Push vs pull — does the destination chain apply messages on its own, or does someone have to trigger it? Push (Ethereum staking, QuarkChain xshard) gives exactly-once delivery: every committed message is eventually applied, no relayer required. Pull (Optimism L2→L1, Superchain interop) gives at-most-once: a message can sit unrelayed forever if no one pays destination gas to deliver it.

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

2/
▶️ Where the data flows — route everything through a central hub (Optimism's standard bridge → L1), or distribute directly between participants? Both QuarkChain's slave-to-slave broadcast (2018) and Optimism's Superchain interop (2024) chose distributed — independently arriving at the same structural answer years apart.

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Glamsterdam is coming.
The road to higher-performance Ethereum continues ⚡️

[Ethereum @ethereum]

Last week, Ethereum core contributors gathered in Svalbard for the Soldøgn interop: a week long event focused on hardening Glamsterdam implementations to scale Ethereum securely ☀️

Read the full recap, including their candidate post-fork gas limit, below:

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Our Korea team participated in multiple events during @buidl_conf week in Seoul 🇰🇷, connecting with builders and exploring opportunities to drive QuarkChain forward.
Great to be part of it.
#buidlweek

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Qi Zhou (@qc_qizhou), Founder of QuarkChain, took the main stage at @EthCC to present:

“Achieving 10 GigaGas/s EVM Execution with BAL and Parallel Execution in the Post-Fusaka Era.”

In this talk, he explores Ethereum L1 scaling, the limits of increasing gas limits, and how BAL and parallel execution enable significantly higher throughput—exceeding 10 GigaGas/s under optimized conditions.

Watch the full talk below ↓

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Ethereum has largely solved scaling — but at the cost of composability.

The fragmentation across L2s is becoming increasingly visible.

@etheconomiczone is exploring how to bring back a more unified, composable Ethereum.

As we explore the limits of EVM execution at QuarkChain, these questions are becoming increasingly relevant.

Still early — but directionally an important conversation.

[The Ethereum Economic Zone @etheconomiczone]

https://t.co/T1730uZRFF

[Qi Zhou @qc_qizhou]

First time at @EthCC and will give talks about web3:// and 10GigiGas EVM execution via BAL and parallelism!

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

.@EthCC is just around the corner.

QuarkChain will be speaking on the main stage:
“Scaling Ethereum L1: Achieving 10 GigaGas/s EVM Execution with Block-Level Access Lists”

As Ethereum’s roadmap brings L1 scaling back into focus, we’ll share what we’ve learned exploring the limits of EVM execution — and what it means for what’s next.

#Ethereum #EthCC #ScalingEthL1

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

QuarkChain has been invited to present on the main stage at @EthCC on April 2.

@qc_qizhou, founder of QuarkChain, will present:
“Scaling Ethereum L1: Achieving 10 GigaGas/s EVM Execution with Block-Level Access Lists”

We’ll share what we learned from exploring the limits of Ethereum execution — and what it could mean for the next phase of L1 scaling.
#EthCC #ScalingEthereum

[QuarkChain @Quark_Chain]

Ethereum is no longer just building for today. It’s preparing for the next decade.

The launch of post-quantum efforts is a clear signal:
Ethereum is evolving into long-term infrastructure, built to withstand not just current challenges, but future ones.

This is what real infrastructure maturity looks like, and it’s exactly why building on Ethereum matters.

[Ethereum Foundation @ethereumfndn]

Today, several teams at the EF are launching https://t.co/MtJ95Ah4z6, a dedicated resource for Ethereum's post-quantum security effort.

What started with early STARK-based signature aggregation research in 2018 has grown into a coordinated, multi-team effort, all open source.

The Post-Quantum team and Cryptography teams, with help from the Protocol Architecture and Protocol Coordination teams, have been working on this body of work for 8+ years.

At https://t.co/MtJ95Ah4z6 you'll find:
- How PQ impacts each protocol layer
- The full PQ roadmap (https://t.co/gPl9StdPSp)
- Open resources: repos, specs, papers, EIPs
- FAQ: 14 questions across 5 categories, written by the PQ team
- A 6-part lean Ethereum interview series (@zeroknowledgefm)
- Interest form for the 2nd Annual PQ Research Retreat (Cambridge, UK, Oct 2026)
- 10+ client teams are already building and shipping devnets weekly through PQ Interop.

All the work is public and all of it is open.
https://t.co/MtJ95Ah4z6