@michaelluo@IChotiner@DouthatNYT@mikiebarb Could THE NEW YORKER engage in some actual media criticism of the Times, instead of doing these weird soft-focus profiles of its columnists?
@tressiemcphd Hmm. I was wondering if it was a pretty shade, because I found my eye drawn to a shapeless dress the other day just because it was white and sky blue and seemed so intensely summery.
Larsson was a journalist who studied the far right in Sweden. And he was particularly worried about the normalization of extremism. My theory is that the Millennium trilogy was his attempt to get EVERYONE to worry about it - a decade before the rise of Trump.
I wrote about *The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo* because I think Stieg Larsson intended it as an anti-Nazi social protest novel for our times:
https://t.co/QGZ7LK85hK
@jonathanchait Another sign that you might be participating in a moral panic is when the supposed experts brought to support your point of view in court admit they have no experience and no evidence to contradict decades of research supporting the other side: https://t.co/1V0wQYeCNN
@jonathanchait You know one way to tell whether you are participating in a moral panic? If you are listening to quacks preaching conversion therapy rather than the 67,000 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics: https://t.co/Y7PjkVi6Fo
@michaelluo The medical "controversy" Sulzberger was talking about is between the 67,000 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics following all the science and best practices and "dozens" of conservative dissenters, who encourage the practice of conversion therapy, based on nothing.
@michaelluo The Washington Post is out here telling the real story of pros vs. cranks, rather than letting Sulzberger run his mouth. Could The New Yorker join them? https://t.co/Y7PjkVi6Fo