@HerndonforIdaho 2. Does your vision require no property taxes on primary residences? Or no property tax on all real property, regardless of whether it is a primary residence and regardless of what type of entity “owns” it?
@HerndonforIdaho 1. Funny that this is even controversial. Obviously you do not own real property when it can be taken away for not paying rent (i.e., property taxes). I, along with all libertarians, and a significant percentage of conservatives, agree with this self-evident fact.
@ComicDaveSmith I’m extremely skeptical that people don’t understand your point. It’s not difficult to understand. They just can’t allow themselves to confront the depravity of murdering innocent people, so they grasp at straws trying to pretend morals don’t exist. “BuT iN WarTiMe…”
@Ace_Archist Due process is a limitation on government action. It is supposed to (certainly not always successfully) prevent government from arbitrarily taking life, liberty, or property. Limitations on government are inherently libertarian.
@ConLawWarrior Also, not allowing the defense to inform the jury of their right to jury nullification is absurd. Juries refusing to enforce bad laws is one of the most effective ways for the people to express their displeasure with the legislature.
@beinlibertarian If it must exist, snap recipients should be able to spend it on whatever. Just as school choice programs should allow parents to spend the benefits on whatever education they deem appropriate, even religious schools. Fund the individual, and the individual can decide what’s best.
@KevinPhb@JL82965237@busywriting@gordy24@LindseyGrahamSC I’m not going to continue talking in circles with someone who (1) denies photo proof, and (2) has already conceded to my points. Keep screaming “retard” and this won’t change what you said.
I’ll leave photos here so you can’t claim otherwise with any legitimacy. ✌️
@KevinPhb@JL82965237@busywriting@gordy24@LindseyGrahamSC You call me a troll? You literally say shit, then say you didn’t say it. You’ve been doing it the entire convo. I post photo proof of it, you say that you were actually the one to post a photo. Your purposefully arguing something you know to be false.