Elon Trump r cnuts

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@ACTPartyUSA @JesseBWatters What is quite telling is even on this right wing, racist, fascist and immoral site, most of the responses Walters and his followers rantings are against their arguments.
Most people on Twitter actually disagree with you. Surely you can see that obvious fact?

[Brian Krassenstein @krassenstein]

MASSIVE BREAKING: Data Set 8 of the Epstein Files show that a victim stated that Trump and Epstein raped her, and that a Limo driver heard Trump in the back speaking to “Jeffrey” about “abusing girls”.

The victim then “committed suicide” in January of 2000 after reporting the incident.

Police didn’t believe it was suicide.

Share this everywhere!

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@DrChrisParry For more detail on how Reform wants to silence the free press, see the great 'ol US Of A and how Tr'cunt is suing any media outlet that speaks out against him.
If that is what you want in the UK vote Reform!

[Mike Young @micyoung75]

You are right that wishing death on a political opponent’s children is reprehensible. Jay Jones should apologize directly to the people he targeted, and if Virginians decide that disqualifies him, so be it.

But let’s finish the sentence you started.

- If violent rhetoric is disqualifying, then it applies to everyone, including the GOP candidates and staffers caught praising Hitler, sharing lynching memes, or joking about shooting migrants at the border.

- If “political pain” talk is over the line, then so are calls from Republican officials to “hang traitors,” “hunt journalists,” or “deal with Democrats the military way,” all of which are easily found on camera or on X from elected Republicans in the last six months.

- And if you are serious about rejecting political violence, then you should say plainly that threatening any family, left or right, is not strategy, it is cowardice.

Condemning violence only when it poll-tests well is not moral clarity. It is branding.

So let’s set one standard, publicly, and live by it:
If you call for blood to win an argument, you do not deserve power.

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@42Typos @BasedTorba @TheDemocrats Exactly.

https://t.co/K2QQ1GFgnA

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@CarolinaDawgs1 @aleparty82 @FrenchieMamaMIA @Martina https://t.co/rkHqbyybON

[Aaron Rupar @atrupar]

WELKER: The president said the tariffs were gonna spark a manufacturing renaissance, but since he announced them in April the US has actually lost 42,000 manufacturing jobs. Are these numbers proof that the tariffs are failing?

BESSENT: It's been a couple of months. We can't snap our fingers and have factories built

WELKER: The economy did add nearly 500,000 manufacturing jobs under President Biden

BESSENT: Most of the jobs created under the Biden administration went to illegal aliens

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@CarolinaDawgs1 @aleparty82 @FrenchieMamaMIA @Martina https://t.co/RYpZIsyGk6

[BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️ @mmpadellan]

REMINDER: The unemployment rate was at or under 4% for 30 consecutive months under President Biden.

He averaged 343,750 jobs/month while in office.

By comparison, trump added an anemic 70,833 jobs per month from January to August 2025, and unemployment rose from 4% to 4.3%.

We were better under Biden.

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@JakeTriton Are you talking about actual executions, like the blowing up of civilians on boats here? 😂😂😂
Says the man who doesn't think Americans smuggle drugs into other countries.
😂😂😂😂

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@atrupar Next question should have been "then who pays the tariff?"

I don't know anyone in business who pays something that they do not cost into their bottom line.

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@wildflowerwine @Arron_banks These cnuts are the puppets of the global elite. They are wrecking governments and society to line their own pockets, while backing authoritarian dictators and marshal law!

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@Exogynous @azur_heike @cturnbull1968 @HouseGOP @CommerceGov You know he based his tariffs on surplus or deficit of trade between countries.
If businesses are buy more from Japan than Japan is buying from the US what is it you expect Japan to do?
Do you want them to order a McDonald's meal for all it's citizens or "what do you want?"

[Secular Talk ([email protected]) @KyleKulinski]

https://t.co/WgdfZKnpAj

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@bennyjohnson
Liar Liar pants on fire 😂😂😂

https://t.co/am3ODfie6P

[Conservative Self-Owns @ConSelfOwns]

maga lies to you and they know it. here's proof https://t.co/LrsvQEjKsW

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@bennyjohnson
What a cnut!
https://t.co/am3ODfie6P

[Conservative Self-Owns @ConSelfOwns]

maga lies to you and they know it. here's proof https://t.co/LrsvQEjKsW

[Elizabeth Warren @SenWarren]

Republicans in Congress can join Democrats right now to turn off the bogus emergency Trump has declared to impose worldwide tariffs.

Or they can continue to bend the knee to Trump.

[Anonymous @YourAnonNews]

MAGA: "pAiD pRoTeSt!!"
DAMN GEORGE SOROS MUST BE RICHER THAN ELON LOL

[Ron Filipkowski @RonFilipkowski]

Howard Lutnick when Tesla was at 288.14 a share: “Buy Tesla! It will never be this cheap again. People are going to dream about today and say they should have bought Musk’s stock.”

Tesla is now 216.66.

[Meidas_Charise Lee @charise_lee]

This man showing us he’s so much smarter than tRump.

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@journeyingfrthr @SeattleTam @ianbremmer I don't agree with everything this guy says but he makes a good point here.
https://t.co/4tfBANLI1w

[Shay Boloor @StockSavvyShay]

MY OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT TRUMP

The frustrating part is that I was on board for a reset. Truly. I’ve said it publicly. I’ve written about it in this very feed. I understood the need for a detox. For decades, the U.S. economy played the part of the rich guy at the table -- picking up the check for a global order that no longer worked in our favor. We hollowed out our industrial base. We enabled unfair trade imbalances under the illusion of diplomacy. We subsidized demand for cheap imports while outsourcing the hard questions about how our domestic workforce would adapt.

Eventually, that had to stop. It was unsustainable -- financially, politically, and morally. We couldn’t keep pretending that a consumption-led economy held together by zero-interest rates and global fragility was a long-term solution. I wanted a rebalancing. I welcomed the idea of a harder, smarter America-first policy that pushed for fair treatment, reciprocal agreements, and a real industrial strategy rooted in technological superiority, national security, and capital formation. That would’ve been leadership.

But that’s not what this is.

What you’ve rolled out isn’t detox -- it’s whiplash. This isn’t strategic decoupling. It’s scattershot retaliation dressed up as reform. There’s no roadmap. No operational playbook. No clear articulation of where this ends or what the metrics of success even are. It’s not an attempt to responsibly unwind America’s role as the global shock absorber -- it’s a brute-force attempt to disorder the existing system with no viable alternative in place.

You can’t replace a fragile supply chain with chaos and call it resilience. You can’t build American industry by torching the scaffolding that underpins capital flows, labor mobility, and global coordination -- especially when the U.S. itself no longer has the domestic capacity to meet its own industrial needs. You talk about bringing jobs home, but the U.S. doesn’t have the labor force, permitting structure, or wage flexibility to stand up full-scale manufacturing at speed. And now -- after years of deportation policies and underinvestment in vocational training -- you’ve made the labor gap even wider.

Capital isn’t going to rush to fill that void just because you raised tariffs. It’s going to wait. It’s going to sit on the sidelines and preserve optionality. Because right now, no CEO can confidently model a five-year capex plan. No board can greenlight supply chain onshoring when they don’t know whether a tariff rate will double next quarter based on your Twitter account or some arbitrary trade deficit formula.

That’s the issue. This wasn’t rolled out as part of a comprehensive American renewal strategy. It wasn’t coordinated with the Fed. It wasn’t communicated clearly to Treasury. It wasn’t backed by a labor reskilling program or any form of public-private manufacturing incentive beyond empty slogans. It was dropped like a bomb -- seemingly designed more to shock than to build.

And in the absence of credible structure, capital is retreating -- not realigning.

I was ready to endure the pain of a thoughtful, structured reset. Most long-term investors were. We’ve lived through tightening cycles. We understood that globalization, as it stood, had reached a breaking point. But this isn’t a correction of imbalances. This is a rupture without scaffolding.

What you’ve created isn’t reindustrialization. It’s an intentional sabotage of capital planning. No executive is going to build a factory with four-year political horizon risk, a floating tariff regime, and no labor certainty. No investor is going to fund expansion in a market where the basic cost of imports can change weekly based on what country has a current account surplus that week. The system you’ve launched isn’t designed for certainty. It’s designed for control.

And the irony is -- we’re not even punishing bad actors. We’re punishing everyone. Allies. Poor countries. Longstanding partners. Israel gets slapped with 17% tariffs while dismantling their own to support American imports. Vietnam gets hit with 46% because it’s become too productive. Lesotho, one of the poorest countries on Earth, faces a 50% tariff because it doesn’t buy enough U.S. goods -- as if that were a sign of unfairness rather than poverty. It’s incoherent. It’s cruel. And it undermines any claim to moral high ground.

You say this is about protecting American workers. But no worker is helped by policy so erratic that no employer wants to hire. No consumer is helped when import costs rise and domestic capacity doesn’t exist to replace them. No investor is helped when the cost of capital spikes in the face of weaponized uncertainty.

This is not a plan to make America stronger. It’s a gamble that markets and allies will blink first. It’s brinkmanship with no floor.

And the most maddening part? There was a path. A real one. A version of this policy that could’ve worked -- not in headlines or soundbites, but in practice. A path that applied pressure with purpose, that aligned economic force with long-term national interest, that sent a clear message to adversaries and partners alike without destabilizing global commerce or blindsiding capital allocators.

You could’ve gone after China -- hard -- and had the backing of nearly every serious investor and strategist on the Street. Not just because of trade deficits or currency suppression, but because China has been actively undermining our economy and our people. I would’ve supported a four-year plan to end all dependence on Chinese manufacturing unless they stopped stealing American IP (DeepSeek). No more games. Make it explicit: if they don’t comply, we’ll back Taiwanese independence and bring the entire global semiconductor economy with us. No ambiguity. No half-threats. As I see it, China is at war with us -- and our policy should reflect that.

With the EU, you could’ve played it clean. Match auto tariffs percent-for-percent. That’s fair. And then leave the rest alone -- especially goods and services. We run a huge surplus on services with the EU. It props up some of our biggest competitive advantages -- enterprise software, consulting, cloud, defense tech, streaming, media IP. Tariffing the EU outside of autos would be like shooting your own foot for balance. We’re not in a trade war with Europe. We're in a competition for global enterprise dominance -- and right now, the U.S. is winning.

That’s what real strength would’ve looked like. That’s what an America-first trade doctrine could’ve achieved. You’d be rebuilding the system from the inside out -- not just throwing bricks through the windows and calling it a redesign.

Investors would’ve backed it. CEOs would’ve planned around it. Global partners would’ve respected it -- even if they didn’t like it. And capital would’ve flowed toward American resilience instead of retreating from American unpredictability.

But instead of that, you went with chaos. And now, confidence is shattered. Not because the numbers are bad -- but because no one knows what the numbers mean anymore.

That’s the cost of burning down the rules without building new ones.

So no, this is not the detox we needed. It’s not strategic decoupling. It’s not a path to renewal. It’s a slow, loud dismantling of the very foundation that has allowed American capital, innovation, and enterprise to dominate for decades. And it didn’t have to be this way.

But now we’re here. And the market is reacting accordingly -- not to the fundamentals, but to the sense that the future may no longer be modelable. That’s not a trade. That’s an exit.

I don’t want this post to be hyper-political. This isn’t about red or blue. It’s not about the 2024 election cycle. It’s not about ideology. It’s about strategy. It’s about execution.

It’s about understanding that when you're the United States -- when you sit at the helm of the global economic engine -- every policy you roll out reverberates through capital markets, supply chains, boardrooms, and governments. Words become signals. Signals become pricing. Pricing becomes pain -- or progress.

And I hope -- for the sake of the markets, for the sake of businesses trying to plan, and for the future we’re all investing into -- that it’s not too late to recalibrate.

Because we don’t need more noise.

We need a plan.

[Elon Trump r cnuts @r_cnuts]

@journeyingfrthr @SeattleTam @ianbremmer Infrastructure support and energy needs to be already in place, usually provided by the state (or in cooperation with) but MAGAS plans seem to see no room for state/burocracy. There are no plans and that is another reason why this will fail.