🚨🇩🇪 COLOGNE, 2015/16: This German teen was one of nearly 600 German women who were sexually assaulted in just one night, on New Year's Eve in 2015/16.
The role of North Africans and Middle Eastern men in the sexual assaults and rapes was not reported by authorities until pressure built days later.
Notably, this female victim from Cologne never got to share her story on German public broadcasters such as ARD and ZDF.
Only the UK's BBC interviewed her — the only broadcaster to give her a voice.
“If you are suggesting the BBC - one of us prestigious broadcasting companies in the world - is making up stories about building buildings collapsing”
Piers Morgan getting schooled on WTC7 after the BBC reported it had completely collapsed whilst it was still fully standing. Then it collapsed/blew up.
The BBC were reading from a predetermined script, they obviously got their timings wrong.
Scary Warning: What’s Coming to Europe. 🛑
GET THIS MESSAGE OUT!
Charles Asher Small of ISGAP just gave a damning speech at the EU Parliament.
It’s time to sit up, pay attention, and correct our course before we look back and ask ourselves “How did we let this happen again?‼️
It's a classic 9/11 conspiracy post recycling well-known claims that don't hold up as evidence of an "inside job."
Courtesy of @JackMedia7 and the 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT https://t.co/GmUOATMnW7
The clip is from Jesse Ventura's heated 2012 appearance on Piers Morgan Tonight, where Ventura pushed theories that the Bush administration essentially allowed or wanted the attacks (citing ignored intelligence warnings and false-flag patterns in history). Morgan pushed back hard, and yes, they went to commercial amid the exchange—standard TV timing in a contentious interview, not some dramatic "cut for a break" to silence truthbombs.
The specific "footage before the fall" point refers to a real BBC error: correspondent Jane Standley reported that WTC 7 (the Salomon Brothers building) had collapsed around 4:54–4:57 p.m. EDT on September 11, 2001, while it was still visibly standing behind her. It actually came down at about 5:20 p.m. Other outlets (including CNN and Reuters) also circulated premature or confused reports that day as the situation was chaotic—fires raging, debris everywhere, conflicting local media and emergency-service info flying around. BBC later explained it as relying on an incorrect Reuters wire that was corrected; editor Richard Porter called it a straightforward mistake in the fog of live coverage, not a script or insider tip. No evidence supports the idea that this proves media complicity in a controlled demolition.
On WTC 7 itself: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted a multi-year investigation and concluded the 47-story building collapsed due to uncontrolled fires (started by debris from the North Tower) that burned for nearly seven hours without sprinklers. Heat caused thermal expansion of steel beams and girders, leading to the failure of a critical column (Column 79) and progressive collapse. NIST found no evidence of explosives or controlled demolition; it was the first known case of a tall modern building collapsing primarily from fire. This matches video, photographic, and engineering analysis—not a cover-up.
The rest of the post—"this world is made up of lies," "inside job," "wake up from their control," and the pitch for The Awakening Compass—is standard conspiracy marketing. Healthy skepticism of government and media is fine (intelligence failures pre-9/11 were real and documented; the official investigations had gaps and political pressures). But leaping from reporting mistakes + a unique fire-induced structural failure to "they hid the footage and it was an inside job covered up by the media" requires extraordinary evidence that simply isn't there. The scientific consensus, physical evidence, and lack of any credible whistleblower or forensic support for explosives point the other way.
These posts thrive on selective framing and emotional calls to "rise above the sheep." The better approach is looking at primary sources (NIST reports, contemporaneous footage with timestamps, BBC's own explanations) rather than clipped videos and book plugs. Conspiracy theories around 9/11 have been exhaustively examined; the ones that stick tend to be the ones that fit the data, not the ones that sell awakening guides.
THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT https://t.co/GmUOATMnW7
In 1996 an American patriot tried to educate viewers of The Ricki Lake Show on the truth
You can tell the jew at the end is lying because of how clearly nervous she got