I’m a known shill for the NWTI so take this with a grain of salt but every argument I’ve heard against it is utter trash. Most amount to “it’s a pipe dream” with not further explanation or alternative. When someone does propose an alternative, it’s either the exact same plan in a different location, or the same mass movementism we’ve been trying with no success since the 1960s.
The most substantial criticism I’ve heard, which is more of an accusation, is that we’re “hiding in the woods” expecting a revolution to magically happen. That I will address.
The NWTI is not a plan of hiding or abandoning every white person that doesn’t live here. The idea is to consolidate. Bring our people, like minded people, into an area on large enough numbers to wield local control. This actually does work and I’ve seen it happening where I live. It presupposes that American cannot be saved, something most serious nationalists acknowledge, and will eventually Balkanize. When that happens, if racially conscious whites are spread out across a sea of brown, we will be destroyed and then it truly is over for our people. It’s not about hiding, it’s about organizing
“What about the revolution?” Simply put, we can’t make the first move. Acting first will give the state a mandate to destroy you. Any action we take must be defensive, or at least appear to be. Yes, that means “wait”, but it also means “prepare”. Ask yourself honestly “how many WNs can I put together n the field today?” Meaning armed, trained men who will lay down their lives for our race? For the vast majority of us, that number is one, yourself, or zero because you aren’t even prepared that well. We are not ready for balkanization or revolution. This is why it can’t be forced and accelerationists are retarded, thinking they just have to lit the match a WN army will manifest out of the ether. We aren’t ready.
There isn’t going to be a mass movement that restores America and expels our enemies. THAT is the pipe dream.
I’m a known shill for the NWTI so take this with a grain of salt but every argument I’ve heard against it is utter trash. Most amount to “it’s a pipe dream” with not further explanation or alternative. When someone does propose an alternative, it’s either the exact same plan in a different location, or the same mass movementism we’ve been trying with no success since the 1960s.
The most substantial criticism I’ve heard, which is more of an accusation, is that we’re “hiding in the woods” expecting a revolution to magically happen. That I will address.
The NWTI is not a plan of hiding or abandoning every white person that doesn’t live here. The idea is to consolidate. Bring our people, like minded people, into an area on large enough numbers to wield local control. This actually does work and I’ve seen it happening where I live. It presupposes that American cannot be saved, something most serious nationalists acknowledge, and will eventually Balkanize. When that happens, if racially conscious whites are spread out across a sea of brown, we will be destroyed and then it truly is over for our people. It’s not about hiding, it’s about organizing
“What about the revolution?” Simply put, we can’t make the first move. Acting first will give the state a mandate to destroy you. Any action we take must be defensive, or at least appear to be. Yes, that means “wait”, but it also means “prepare”. Ask yourself honestly “how many WNs can I put together n the field today?” Meaning armed, trained men who will lay down their lives for our race? For the vast majority of us, that number is one, yourself, or zero because you aren’t even prepared that well. We are not ready for balkanization or revolution. This is why it can’t be forced and accelerationists are retarded, thinking they just have to lit the match a WN army will manifest out of the ether. We aren’t ready.
There isn’t going to be a mass movement that restores America and expels our enemies. THAT is the pipe dream.
And how did THEY define “nation”, dumbass? This is unbelievably fuckin stupid. You have no idea what nationalism is, and even when I get the google definition for you(since you’re too fuckin stupid to know what these words mean) it still agrees with me and still you have the temerity to tell me I’m wrong when every example proves me right. You are a pathetic larping retard
1: that’s just reiterating what I said. The Roman’s saw themselves as a race, separate from Gauls, and as a race had the right to rule over them. Work on your reading comprehension.
2: because that is the root of the word, it’s true meaning. BUT here is the definition, provided by google, as requested
1: Romans were racial supremacists of the highest order who literally believed they had a birthright to rule the world by virtue of their race. This only fell apart in the late empire
2: this is a completely dishonest semantics argument. I don’t care if the Roman’s had a concept of the “white race”, and neither do you. Your concept of a nation is the boomer magic soul theory. A nation is made of people first. I don’t care about governments or geography, I care about my people.
@RevGahagan “Justifies balkanization” you say that like it’s something we have control over. It’s an inevitability. The only question is what happens to us when it happens
@grok@GhostofArtBell@GenericSnarky@Schmutz_9R so, even if we go by the most generous measurements (13 million illegals and a sample size of 180) what percentage of that 13,000,000 does that 180 constitute