Just tested this. Result: Native NVFP4 MoE compute for Gemma-4 unblocked on DGX Spark via flashinfer b12x + a 2-edit vLLM gelu_tanh patch — now serving at +48% compared to Marlin single-stream (46 vs 31 tok/s) and 412 tok/s at N=16, with tool calling intact.
Go @UnslothAI !
We’re releasing Gemma 4 NVFP4 quants that run 1.5× faster on your GPU.
Gemma-4-12B NVFP4 works on 11GB VRAM.
26B-A4B hits 13K tok/s (B200).
Unsloth NVFP4 enables faster, more accurate 4-bit Blackwell inference.
Blog: https://t.co/EPAHgqe2B2
Gemma NVFP4: https://t.co/RWflncpLPJ
@UnslothAI@NVIDIAAI@googlegemma Coming back with the result: Native NVFP4 MoE compute for Gemma-4 unblocked on DGX Spark via flashinfer b12x + a 2-edit vLLM gelu_tanh patch — now serving at +48% compared to Marlin, single-stream (46 vs 31 tok/s) and 412 tok/s at N=16, with tool calling intact.
@vkrajacic Tried opening \\wsl.localhost\Ubuntu\whatever\path\ and it opened it initially, then went up the folder tree folder to folder until it exited to My Computer. Am i using it wrong?
@NicusorDanRO Eu nu cred că cineva cinstit poate vedea cap-coada reportajul Recorder și să mai doarmă noaptea.
Mai ales cineva care poate face ceva direct și concret în privința asta.
Vestea proastă este că votanții progresiști sunt cei care înțeleg cel mai bine ceea ce a expus Recorder.
I used to think quite highly of you and appreciate you. Or it may be that I am not understanding your position clearly. Could you elaborate what you are questioning here? You really think they could give newborns the actual disease? Or are you questioning the entire logic of vaccines?
@BarnaTanczos, am văzut afirmația de la Digi de aseară despre verificările pe care ANAF urmează să le facă operatorilor de magazine online. Ar fi foarte util ca mesajul/directiva către inspectorii ANAF sa clarifice cat mai explicit că urmăriți mărirea veniturilor la buget prin combaterea evaziunii și practicilor ilegale, nu prin amenzi forțate pe chestiuni inventate sau chichițe procedurale. Întreaga industrie ar aprecia sincer un astfel de demers. Succes!
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy need not, and must not, have any deal forced upon him by any outside nation that does not guarantee the security and the sovereignty of the Ukrainian people, the people who elected him with over 73% of the popular vote, in an election that was recognized as free and fair by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), where I served as a Commissioner and Congressional Appointee. Russia has never held such elections.
President Zelenskyy, and all negotiators, need to know this: There is an outcome-determinative number of Members of the United States Congress, from both parties and in both Chambers, who are ready, willing, and able to do whatever it takes to prevent Communist Dictator Vladimir Putin from being rewarded for his illegal invasion, raping, kidnapping, torturing and murdering of the Ukrainian people, including so many women and children. We will use every lever and every vote at our disposal, regardless of the personal or political consequences. This matter is that time-sensitive and it is that existential. It is legacy-defining.
We all want an immediate end to this brutal Russian invasion and killing. For a peace agreement to be fair and lasting, it must be done in a way that holds the Russian invaders accountable, protects the dignity of the Ukrainian victims, and provides for fair and equitable cost-sharing amongst all European nations. To do otherwise would be to encourage future invasions and to perpetuate future heartache and bloodshed.
This is about Peace Through Strength. This is about Patriotic Common Sense. And Patriotic Common Sense is what America must always stand for.
Unfortunately, the arguments seem valid. @EmmanuelMacron shot himself in the leg with this one, rather literally. The pro-US/pro-Trump gang was already gaining popularity in Romania, for all the wrong reasons, but this was not one of them. Now it will be!
I don't want to be right, but we might have to start looking at making some EUE plans if the UE fails the eastern front.
Dear President Macron @EmmanuelMacron
Dear Minister Barrot, @jnbarrot
I am writing to seek clarification on several points regarding the upcoming meeting in Paris.
Could you please explain why you have chosen to host a meeting on Monday with only "the principal European countries" to discuss "European security"? Do you believe that involving only a select few nations is sufficient to address the complex security challenges facing Europe?
Are you (Minister Barrot) aware of the significant efforts made by Eastern European countries, which have long been actively collaborating with NATO to strengthen their military bases and contribute to collective security? Given this historical context, what is your understanding of the contributions and concerns of these nations? Their experiences and perspectives are indispensable to any meaningful and comprehensive discussion on European security.
Is their close relationship with the United States the reason they have been excluded from this meeting with the "main European countries"? Additionally, why was this meeting not organized by President Costa of European Council or President Donald Tusk, whose country currently holds the Presidency of the EU, or even HR Kaja Kallas?
Following VP Vance's speech, you stated, "Nous n’allons pas nous laisser intimider" ("We will not let ourselves be intimidated") and, regarding freedom of expression, "Nous n’avons pas de leçon à recevoir" ("We have no lessons to learn"). You further mentioned, "Il faut se défaire des complexes d’infériorité" ("We must rid ourselves of inferiority complexes"). Are you suggesting that the United States is responsible for instilling such "inferiority complexes"? How many French citizens actually feel burdened by these so-called complexes?
Moreover, imagine being a citizen from a European country on the frontier of Ukraine - a nation directly impacted by the ongoing conflict - and not being invited to a discussion about European security. This exclusion is not just an oversight; it is a profound display of arrogance that undermines the unity of Europe. The real conflict here is not what others have said but the division and disrespect you risk creating by sidelining key nations. Your policy risks fostering a sense of inferiority.
You cannot speak on behalf of all of Europe. Europe is not just France or the "principal countries" you have invited to Paris. It is a diverse continent, and its security concerns must be addressed inclusively.
The voices of all nations, especially those in Eastern Europe, must be heard and respected.
Anything less is a betrayal of the very principles of European solidarity and democracy, as highlighted by VP Vance.
@donaldtusk@eucopresident
Le Figaro - à lire : Guerre en Ukraine : une réunion entre les «principaux pays européens» se tiendra lundi à Paris https://t.co/Pf2ntqnMta
I've had a chat last night about Donald Trump's recent re-election and policies, and how they could have mixed impacts on Romania across several dimensions.
I think I was the more concerned party in this debate, so here's a quick breakdown of how things are looking like:
1. Security and Defense
Romania is likely to benefit from continued U.S. military support, especially as a NATO ally and host of the U.S. missile defense system. Trump's transactional approach may lead to increased military cooperation, but Romania might face pressure to further boost defense spending beyond the current 2.5% of GDP127.
2. Economic Relations
Romania could see opportunities for enhanced trade and investment with the U.S., particularly in defense industries and energy security. However, Trump's protectionist policies and skepticism toward the EU might strain Romania's balancing act between Washington and Brussels127.
3. Immigration
Trump's stricter immigration policies pose challenges for the Romanian diaspora in the U.S., with thousands at risk of deportation under new enforcement measures5.
4. Political Landscape
Trump's victory may embolden nationalist and conservative parties in Romania, such as AUR, which align with his sovereigntist rhetoric. Conversely, pro-European parties could use this context to reinforce EU-NATO ties and advocate for stability36.
5. Regional Stability
Uncertainty over Trump's stance on Ukraine could impact Romania's security, given its proximity to the conflict zone. Any potential U.S.-Russia negotiations might leave Romania in a precarious position2.Overall, while Romania may gain in defense and economic ties with the U.S., it faces risks from geopolitical shifts, immigration policies, and internal political polarization.
I must agree that there are certain risks and threats, but there could also be opportunities. We'll have to watch and see how it all plays out.
And it's not just allegations. Could you imagine that a candidate comes from nowhere, has no physical campaign, officially declares zero budget for his campaign, and then wins? And there's plenty of evidence apparently, but they didn't see this coming so they (the authorities) ignored it. That was a mistake indeed.
It will go through the justice system and we will see the results.