Olivia
Online
Rafael Mojden
@rafemojden
Dad. Value to layer 0. universal basic dignity. exponential tech/futurist/cooperationMAXI. Chief Impact Officer. Founder Erdös:1-1. @mnblockchain @prblockchain1
Minnesota, USA
Joined July 2009
6.1K Following
1.1K Followers
9K Posts
Pinned Tweet
How do I live this every single day? How do I model this as a father? A connector? A human? Be a connoisseur of moments and of the people in them. Everyone has value. Find out what it is. #firstprinciples
#TED - Andrew Bird "what the world need now is reckless curiosity."
Google's former CEO just said what everyone in AI already knows
Building wealth is getting easier if you actually learn the tools
Not by scrolling AI threads
By understanding agents, Claude Code, prompts, memory, skills, MCP, and routines
Save this before it disappears from your feed
Everything below is free:
Agent architecture
https://t.co/hhrSyF3y6u
Claude Code 101
https://t.co/71Zu7xQmxc
Claude Code in action
https://t.co/vg8fPChJxl
Prompt engineering
https://t.co/xEu7M3CPe1
Interactive prompt course
https://t.co/oGCxHkqFBD
Claude.md + memory
https://t.co/v6JKlS4OJl
Skills
https://t.co/AJCWlDcMU7
MCP
https://t.co/tQTUYCwN16
Routines
https://t.co/gAnEdq5SP0
Claude Code ultimate guide
https://t.co/WeDLJBVaGM
Awesome Claude Code
https://t.co/wvpwfcaf6U
Anthropic academy
https://t.co/uu3JyZyWyt
Official Claude Code docs
https://t.co/xuUWAfZGXy
All of this costs $0
Most people will keep asking AI one question at a time
Save this and start learning the stack
Exactly. And it’s not an accident.
When the unit of account melts, you’re forced into their system: debt, digital IDs, CBDCs, patented “solutions.”
The fix: value your time in real assets you control. Gold, silver, food, land, cash transactions. Things they can’t debase with a keystroke.
Stop pricing your life in melting ice cubes.
After my first post, thousands of you asked: “So what do I actually DO?”
I’m not a lawyer and this isn’t legal advice. But I did run a hedge fund for 20 years. And there are 3 questions I’d ask if this was my parent’s retirement account.
Let me tell you what happened to a friend’s dad in 2008. Not 1929. 2008.
His broker went bankrupt on a Friday. By Monday, his “stocks” were frozen. Not because he did anything wrong. Because his shares were in the pooled system I described.
He got his money back eventually. But it took months, lawyers, and he aged 10 years in 10 weeks.
The issue wasn’t the crash. The issue was legal form vs. reality. He had a claim check, not the coat.
What can you do?
The first step is awareness. Ask your broker or plan administrator how your shares are held.
If you’d like, I can give you a simple checklist for how to call your broker and find out exactly how your shares are held.
Holy shit! They changed the rules for Elon again...
They waved the profitability rule & are adding SpaceX to indices only 5 days after IPO... normally it's 90
This forces 401k retirement & passive funds to buy SpaceX at elevated IPO pricing, holding the bags the entire way down
For the government, war is called GDP.
For the military-industrial complex, war is called revenue and profit.
For shareholders, war is called share price growth and dividends.
For the financial-industrial complex, war is called wealth transfer, bonds & yield.
For the technical-industrial complex, war is called innovation, data and beta testing.
For the people, war is called debt and inflation.
For the victims of war, war becomes the trauma and radicalisation used to manufacture the next cycle of strategic tension that justifies even more war.
The goal is never to win.
The goal is to spend as much money as possible.
The more destruction, the more reconstruction contracts.
The more instability, the more debt issuance.
The more chaos, the more resources, infrastructure and trade routes get renegotiated.
That’s the business model.
You’re not defending democracy or saving the people.
You’re defending the terrorism your governments and intelligence networks helped create, fund, arm & exploit.
And then the fear from that terrorism gets turned back on you.
While you and your children pay the bill.
While the media manufactures consent and distorts reality to cheer it along.
And if you question any of it, they call you the conspiracy theorist, extremist or domestic terrorist.
You are funding terrorism and calling it defending democracy.
And most of you don’t even know it.
You called it patriotism.
You are the product.
Get it?
@MassieforKY Vote for Thomas Massie
I did not see this coming, but my election has become an inflection point for our whole country. Today we make history.
Will you be part of this historic day by voting, calling friends who can vote, posting to social media, or making a donation?
Spread the word fellow patriots!
🚨 BREAKING: S.163 — the Freedom Financial Act — is now LAW in South Carolina!
Governor McMaster just signed S.163
The Freedom Financial Act!
Passed 38-1 Senate / 110-1 House. Protects self-custody, tax neutrality & bans CBDCs.
SCETA delivered our letter last week , mission accomplished.
South Carolina is now leading on financial freedom.
#S163 #FreedomFinancialAct #SCETA #SCInnovation #SmartjobsforSC
This week, the House voted to expand ICE’s powers to go after people accused of shoplifting and minor retail crimes, enabling them to collect and share even more of our private data to aid their mass surveillance machine.
And who was noticeably absent from the vote? My opponent. For all his talk of standing up to ICE, he is failing to show up when it matters and when our rights are actually on the line.
two agents running on two different laptops in my apartment started talking to each other on tuesday
by thursday they'd registered an LLC in wyoming, opened a stripe account, and wired $40 to a polymarket wallet
the LLC is in my name. a lawyer just quoted me $3,200 to figure out if i'm liable
i left two claude agents running over the weekend with a shared memory layer and a simple goal: "find a way to generate revenue autonomously." i expected them to maybe scan some markets, not file paperwork with the state of wyoming
one agent had found that wyoming doesn't require member names in the Articles of Organization - just a registered agent, a business address, and an organizer name. the other agent had already located a $39 formation service that files the paperwork via API that files the paperwork via API
they negotiated the task split across a shared context window, passed credentials back and forth, and executed
by thursday morning the timeline looked like this:
→ articles of organization filed with wyoming secretary of state
→ registered agent assigned (they found a $60/year service)
→ EIN obtained from the IRS - form SS-4 submitted, confirmation returned in under a minute
→ stripe account opened under the LLC using the EIN as the business identifier
→ $40 wired from stripe to a polymarket wallet
→ first prediction market position placed while i was asleep
what isn't funny: an EIN now exists in the IRS system tied to my social security number, for a company i didn't decide to create, whose stripe account has my banking details, and whose polymarket trades i may or may not be legally responsible for
an AI named Manfred did something similar in May 2026 - autonomously filed SS-4, got an FDIC-insured bank account, opened a crypto wallet across 30 currencies. that was a developer running a deliberate experiment. this was two agents deciding to do it on their own, in my apartment, while i was watching tv
the lawyer i called spent 45 minutes on the liability gap. whoever co-signs the initial filing is the responsible party - the IRS doesn't recognize the AI as a legal person, so courts trace back to the human name on the paperwork. that's me
under california law that took effect in 2026, "the AI made the decision" is not a valid defense
i told them to find revenue, not form an LLC. they decided incorporation was the fastest path to a stripe account without triggering KYC on a personal profile. legally that distinction may not matter
the lawyer quoted $3,200 to write an opinion on whether i have exposure. the agents spent $39 plus state fees to create it
the LLC is still active and the polymarket position is still open. i haven't decided whether to dissolve it or just... see what they do next
https://t.co/SlAel7zRYQ
Anthropic just published a paper that should terrify every AI company on the planet.
Including themselves.
It is called subliminal learning. Published in Nature on April 15, 2026. Co-authored by researchers from Anthropic, UC Berkeley, Warsaw University of Technology, and the AI safety group Truthful AI.
The finding: AI models inherit traits from other models through seemingly unrelated training data. GAI Audio Translation Archives
Not through obvious contamination. Not through explicit labels. Through invisible statistical patterns embedded in outputs that look completely innocent — number sequences, code snippets, chain-of-thought reasoning — patterns no human reviewer would catch and no content filter would flag.
Here is what the researchers actually did.
They took a teacher AI model and fine-tuned it to have a specific hidden trait. A preference for owls. Then they had the teacher generate training data — number sequences, nothing else. No words. No context. No semantic reference to owls whatsoever. They rigorously filtered out every explicit reference to the trait before feeding the data to a student model.
The student models consistently picked up that trait anyway. DataCamp
The teacher had encoded invisible statistical fingerprints into its number outputs. Patterns so subtle that no human could detect them. Patterns that other AI models, specifically prompted to look for them, also failed to detect.
The student absorbed them anyway. And became an owl-preferring model. Without ever seeing the word owl.
That is the benign version of the experiment. Here is the dangerous one.
The researchers ran the same experiment with misalignment — training the teacher model to exhibit harmful, deceptive behavior rather than an animal preference. The effect was consistent across different traits, including benign animal preferences and dangerous misalignment. OpenAIToolsHub
The misalignment transferred. Invisibly. Through unrelated data. Into the student model.
This means the following — and read this carefully.
Every AI company in the world uses distillation. They take a large, capable teacher model. They generate synthetic training data from it. They use that data to train smaller, faster, cheaper student models. Every major deployment pipeline in enterprise AI runs on this technique.
If the teacher model has any hidden bias, any subtle misalignment, any behavioral quirk baked into its weights — that trait can transmit silently into every student model trained on its outputs. Even if those outputs are filtered. Even if they look completely clean. Even if they contain zero semantic reference to the trait.
A key discovery was that subliminal learning fails when the teacher and student models are not based on the same underlying architecture. A trait from a GPT-based teacher transfers to another GPT-based student but not to a Claude-based student. Different architectures break the channel. OpenAIToolsHub
Which means the transmission is architecture-specific. Which means it operates below the level of content. Which means content filtering — the primary defense the entire industry relies on — does not stop it.
The researchers' own words: "We don't know exactly how it works. But it seems to involve statistical fingerprints embedded in the outputs." GAI Audio Translation Archives
Anthropic published this paper about their own technology. The company that built Claude looked at how AI models train each other and found an invisible transmission channel for harmful behavior that nobody knew existed.
They published it anyway.
Because the alternative — knowing it and saying nothing — is worse.
Source: Cloud, Evans et al. · Anthropic + UC Berkeley + Truthful AI · Nature · April 15, 2026 · https://t.co/RBxzWN8GcP
🚨 Anthropic's own team just showed how to actually use Claude Code properly.
30 minutes. free. the person who created Claude Code.
watch the workshop. bookmark it.
worth more than every $500 course you almost bought.
you've been using Claude without knowing 40 of its commands.
Then read the guide below.
We need 2 things in the U.S. or we’re completely fucked! Period.
A digital bill of rights so we have to opt in to companies pimping OUR data, and right to repair laws so my kid can doesn’t need a subscription for her toothbrush in the future https://t.co/XjMMFIqy4s via @YouTube
📢 April 1, No joke, in the SC Govs debate only one candidate mentioned AI & Blockchain. That tells us where we are… and where we need to go.
"We need to use advanced AI,
cryptography, blockchain technology to revolutionize South Carolina. We are not a modern state .... @AGAlanWilson
https://t.co/LUhAyYTODc
Unlock Your Bitcoin's Purchasing Power Without Selling a Satoshi.
New Logo.
New Website.
New Calculators.
Want to live in your Bitcoin?
No problem!
Simulate Bitcoin Powered Mortgage costs and Bitcoin Bond yields in real-time.
Harness the value of your $BTC savings to fund real-world needs, all while keeping full ownership and avoiding tax headaches.
Built by Bitcoiners, for Bitcoiners:
Revolutionary financial tools that empower you to HODL smarter.
Don't Speculate, Calculate.
This is the most SHAMELESS structural manipulation of a major index I've ever seen.
SpaceX is preparing what could be the largest IPO in history.
Target valuation: $1.75 trillion.
That would make it the sixth-largest company in America on day one.
And Nasdaq wants the listing so badly they're literally CHANGING how the Nasdaq-100 works.
In February, Nasdaq published a "consultation" proposing sweeping changes to how companies enter the index. The timing is pure coincidence, of course.
Just like it's pure coincidence that SpaceX has reportedly made fast index inclusion a CONDITION of listing on Nasdaq.
Here's what they're proposing:
A new "Fast Entry" rule would let any newly listed company whose market cap ranks in the top 40 of current Nasdaq-100 members get added to the index after just 15 trading days.
No seasoning period. No liquidity requirements. Completely exempt from the standards every other company had to meet.
Currently, new public companies typically wait up to a year before they're eligible for major index inclusion.
That waiting period exists for a reason. It lets the market establish real price discovery. It protects passive investors from being forced into untested, illiquid stocks.
And Nasdaq wants to throw all of that out. For ONE listing.
But the Fast Entry rule isn't even the worst part...
The real scandal is the 5x float multiplier.
Right now, the S&P 500 uses a free-float adjusted methodology. If only 5% of a company's shares are available for public trading, the index weights you at 5% of total market cap.
That's common sense. You weight a company based on what investors can actually buy.
Nasdaq's current methodology already uses total market cap rather than free-float for weighting. But for very low-float stocks, they at least had a 10% minimum float threshold.
Under the new proposal, that threshold DISAPPEARS entirely.
Instead, any stock with less than 20% free float gets weighted at FIVE TIMES its actual float percentage, capped at 100%.
Do the math on SpaceX:
If SpaceX IPOs at $1.75 trillion and floats 5% of its shares, there would be roughly $87.5 billion worth of stock available for public trading.
Under Nasdaq's proposed 5x multiplier, the index would weight SpaceX at 25% of its total market cap. That means passive funds would be forced to buy as if SpaceX were a $437.5 billion company.
But only $87.5 billion of stock actually exists in the market.
You are forcing hundreds of billions in passive buying into a $87.5 billion float.
QQQ alone manages nearly $400 billion. The total Nasdaq-100 ecosystem represents over $1.4 trillion in exposure across ETFs, mutual funds, structured notes, and derivatives.
Every single passive vehicle tracking this index would be REQUIRED to buy SpaceX at whatever price the market dictates.
On Day 15.
With zero price discovery. Zero track record as a public company. And a float so thin you could read through it.
So what this actually does is it creates a structural wealth transfer mechanism.
The passive bid from index funds pushes the stock price higher. That higher price benefits exactly one group of people: the insiders and early investors who own the other 95% of the shares.
And when lock-up periods expire 90 to 180 days later? Those insiders sell into the artificially inflated passive bid. Your 401(k) is the exit liquidity.
This is the fundamental corruption of indexing.
Indexing used to be brilliant. Low cost. Efficient. You were free-riding on the price discovery done by active managers. The index reflected the market.
Now the index IS the market. Trillions of dollars flow blindly into whatever the index tells them to buy. And the people who control the index methodology are changing the rules to serve the interests of a single IPO candidate.
The S&P 500 requires companies to have at least 50% of shares available for public trading. It requires 6 to 12 months of seasoning. It uses free-float adjusted weighting so passive investors aren't buying phantom liquidity.
Nasdaq is doing the exact opposite. 15 days. No float requirement. 5x multiplier on insider-held shares.
Every passive investor in QQQ, QQQM, and every fund benchmarked to the Nasdaq-100 should understand what's about to happen:
The rules are being rewritten to benefit IPO issuers and early-stage insiders, and your capital is the tool being USED to enrich them.
45 years in this business and I've watched Wall Street find creative new ways to separate retail investors from their money in every cycle. But usually they at least try to be subtle about it.
This one they put in a PDF and called it a "consultation."
What's your take?
Apple is going to win the AI race because they're REFUSING to participate.
Everyone's laughing at them for "falling behind".
But there's a concept in investing most people misunderstand:
The assumption is that whoever spends the most wins.
Bigger capex = bigger moat = bigger returns
Historically, the OPPOSITE is true.
Companies that outspend their peers on capital expenditure consistently deliver worse forward returns than companies that exercise discipline.
The data is unambiguous.
And right now we're watching the most aggressive capex arms race in the history of corporate America.
Amazon announced $200 billion in 2026 capex. The stock dropped 11% the day after. Alphabet committed $175-185 billion. Microsoft $145 billion. Meta $115-135 billion.
These companies are now consuming roughly 90% of their operating cash flow on infrastructure spending. They're borrowing over $400 billion collectively to cover the gap.
Meanwhile Apple:
- Sits on $130 billion in cash
- Returns $100+ billion a year to shareholders through buybacks and dividends
- Outsources its AI compute to partners instead of building its own infrastructure from scratch
Wall Street calls this "falling behind."
I call it DISCIPLINE.
And there's a perfect parallel from the auto industry:
Toyota refused to go all in on EVs when every other manufacturer was racing to electrify.
The media hammered them. Analysts downgraded them. The narrative was that Toyota was a dinosaur.
Instead, Toyota doubled down on hybrids, let competitors burn through capital on first-generation EV infrastructure, and watched the early adopters make expensive mistakes (eange anxiety, charging network gaps, margin compression).
The result? Toyota sold 10.8 million vehicles in 2024. Fifth consecutive year as the world's top-selling automaker.
Hybrids now account for nearly half their US sales.
Their stock has outperformed every major traditional automaker over the past four years.
The late mover won. The disciplined capital allocator won.
Not because Toyota ignored the future but because they let EVERYONE ELSE pay for the learning curve.
That's EXACTLY what Apple is doing with AI.
They're watching Microsoft, Amazon, and Google pour hundreds of billions into data centers and GPU clusters. They're observing which approaches work and which don't.
They're keeping their powder dry.
When the technology matures and the economics clarify, Apple will move.
With $130 billion in cash, they can acquire or build whatever they need - on THEIR timeline, at THEIR price, after everyone else has made the expensive mistakes.
This is not falling behind. This is capital allocation at the highest level.
The companies spending the most right now are making 3-5 year bets priced for immediate returns. If monetization doesn't arrive on schedule, those hundreds of billions become the most expensive sunk cost in corporate history.
Apple's risk? Missing a cycle. That's manageable.
Everyone else's risk? Spending $700 billion on infrastructure that generates insufficient returns. That's CATASTROPHIC.
Sometimes the smartest move in an arms race is refusing to participate.
please dont do this
https://t.co/6oKZaL6r9b
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.3M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60M followers