Näin Hesari perusteli v 2025 STT:n uutisista luopumista:
"Haluamme tarjota lukijoille omaehtoista, muusta mediamaisemasta erottuvaa journalismia."
Keskiviikon HS-etusivun perusteella sanoisin, että muutos uutislehdestä featuremediaksi on onnistunut hyvin.
Vapaaehtoinen kansalaistoiminta on arvokasta joka puolella. Jopa niin arvokasta, että korkean profiilin huijarit sepustavat tarinoita omasta osallistumisestaan.
Indiana Fever coach says she “isn’t educated enough from a scientific standpoint” to say if men should be able to play women’s sports. These people are batshit insane.
Something strange is happening in Moscow — explosion near generals, and Russia’s biggest bank suddenly out of cash
Reports from Moscow tonight are chaotic and contradictory, but two things stand out:
1. An explosion hit an area where several Russian generals were present
A bomb went off in Moscow during the morning, and multiple Russian channels claim high‑ranking officers were nearby. No confirmed casualties yet — Kremlin sources are silent, and local Telegram feeds are full of panic and speculation.
What’s clear: Security forces are flooding the area.
. Russia’s largest bank is suddenly “out of money”
At the same time, users acros several regions report that Sberbank, Russia’s biggest bank, is experiencing major liquidity issues:
ATMs empty
withdrawals blocked
“technical failures” across branches
In a stressed wartime economy — refinery fires, drone strikes, elite capital flight — a banking freeze is a dangerous sign.
The combination is alarming
Explosion + generals on site + Sberbank liquidity shock = a Moscow that looks unstable tonight.
If my interpretation is correct, she is arguing against the motion that “the West is right to be suspicious of Islam,” yet in the same breath she recounts that Muslims at the Oxford Union had to intervene to prevent a debater from being subjected to violence. In doing so she effectively concedes her own case.
Her argument here is also only constructed to win applause rather than actually challenge the statement of the debate.
Simply put, she lost her own argument by seemingly exposing the nature of some of the people she’s defending and revealed that she is a sub-par debater, all because she wanted to personally attack her opponent.
Is this the standard of Oxford debate in 2026? If so it’s an utter waste of time going.
Commies never needed to beat you in a debate, just needed to make sure the debate never happened on open ground.
Gramsci (Italian Marxist) called it cultural hegemony and the war of position.
The goal is for commies to take the institutions that shape what people believe, such as the schools, the universities, the media, and entertainment.
The purpose is to install the ideology so deep that it stops looking like an opinion and starts feeling like common sense or the natural order of things. People absorb it before they’re old enough to question it, and most of them never even realize an argument took place.
And once those institutions are quietly under control, politics inevitably follows on its own. Their patient and steady capture replace elections and honest persuasion.
But the thing is that people see it.
Gallup measured trust in American media in September 2025 at 28%, the lowest number in the entire 50 year history of the poll, down from 72% in 1976.
For the first time, more Americans say they distrust the media outright than trust it at all. So the institutions are captured, they’re manufacturing consent, but they’re not omnipotent.
And as long as at least some people still distrust, they still have a fighting chance to alter, evade, or abolish these infected institutions.
Millions are watching the Islam debate from Oxford. The discussion is spreading around the world. That is why I accepted the invitation to speak.
Earlier, I discussed with @SamaramGill what happened in Oxford, and why the debate is important.
@TeivoTeivainen Oletko Teivo sitä mieltä, että koska Sinä satut kuulumaan siihen aktivistien yksiääniseen joukkoon, joka saa äänensä kuuluviin valtamediassa, mitään ongelmaa ”tiedonvälityksessä” ei ole?
Tällaista se on. Ei tämä anna tavalliselle uteliaalle ihmiselle aihetta juhlaan.
In @Jacob_Rees_Mogg’s desperation during the Oxford Islam debate, he also came up with this bit of loony argument, praising Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) as a great Islamic political theorist we ought to admire in the West today.
Sir Jacob is a fan of Ibn Khaldun’s writings on taxation. But what does he think of the rest of political thought?
Unlike some contemporary scholars who argued Jihad should only be defensive, Ibn Khaldun explicitly stated that Islam has a unique divine obligation to aggressively subjugate other nations. He wrote: “In the Islamic community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.”
He contrasted Islam with Christianity, arguing that Christians were not commanded to seek global political dominion, whereas Muslims were. He fiercely held that Muslims were intrinsically culturally and morally superior to all non-Muslims simply by virtue of possessing the Islamic faith and legal code. He also argued that an oppressive, tyrannical, and unjust Muslim ruler was vastly preferable to even a single day of civil unrest or rebellion, and that citizens have an absolute religious duty to unconditionally submit to state authority, even if the ruler is actively stealing their property or acting cruelly.
In his foundational work, The Muqaddimah, he also explains his pseudo-scientific views on sub-Saharan Africans, explicitly writing that people living in the extreme hot climates of sub-Saharan Africa were “closer to dumb animals than to rational beings” and alleged that they lived in caves and engaged in cannibalism.
He used these prejudices to justify the Arab slave trade, writing: “Therefore, the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is essentially human and possess attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals. He also claimed that Black people were characterized by universal “stupidity, levity, excitability, and great emotionalism,” attributing this to the “hot air” of their geographic zone.
His views on Islamic political supremacy were uncompromising, and he openly argued that a religious theocracy (Khilafah) was the only legitimate form of governance. He explicitly stated that purely secular political systems based on human reason are fundamentally corrupt and sinful because they prioritise worldly greed over divine law. He even had zero tolerance for heterodoxy within the Muslim world, railing against Shia Muslims, and aggressively condemned and sought to ban the works of ecstatic or philosophical Sufi mystics (such as Ibn Arabi).
So, are you embarrassed of this speech yet, @Jacob_Rees_Mogg?
"Tuloerot väestöryhmien välillä ovat kasvaneet maassamme liian suuriksi" (%)
Samaa mieltä olevien osuus puolueittain:
VASL 90 %
SDP 82 %
VIHR 70 %
KESK 59 %
LNYT 49 %
KD 48 %
RKP 45 %
PS 26 %
KOK 15 %
Lähde: EVA (2026)
Tuloerot eivät ole kasvaneet viimeiseen 25 vuoteen. Mitä on tapahtunut yleissivistykselle?
@katleena@1st_sealord Älä lähde inttämään tuon trollin kanssa.
Jos kuitenkin päätät lähteä, niin muista, että ryssä ei missään tapauksessa katko kaapeleita Suomenlahdella.
Tää tollo loordi on ihan viimeinen, joka jaksaa pitää tuossakin asiassa mahorkan suupielessä ja kaalikeiton liedellä.
.@Yleisradio :n ongelmallisuus alkaa olla kestämätöntä. Alla klippi YLEn jutusta aiheesta 👇👇👇
Tässä STT:n todenmukaisempi uutinen:
”Noin 60 000 siirtolaista on tullut Marokosta Espanjan Ceutaan viime päivinä, kertoo alueen johtaja. Ainakin 34 on kuollut rajan ylityksessä. STT”
Mikä siinä on, että YLE ei voi sanoa asiat niin kuin ne ovat?
Poland has tightened asylum laws, border procedures, and has built effective barriers on its border with Belarus, which is the eastern border of the EU. We have invested billions of euros and engaged thousands of soldiers, police officers and border guards. Spain must follow our example if Schengen is to survive.
EU countries call for Spain to be kicked out of Schengen.
On July 30, Spain under far-left Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez provoked the largest migration crisis since 2015.
At least 50,000 North African migrants stormed the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla. No one tried to stop them or protect the EU borders.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni proposed expelling Spain from the Schengen visa-free zone to protect Italy’s borders from the flood of illegal migrants.
“Italy will not stand idle,” Meloni said.
Her initiative is already backed by Finland, Czechia, and Denmark — forming a bloc of four states with Italy.
France has already introduced border controls with Spain.
“Spain has completely failed to protect the external Schengen border. This cannot continue. Countries that do not fulfill their obligations cannot remain members of the Schengen area,” the Finnish minister stated.
Il Governo ha deciso di sospendere temporaneamente il regime di libera circolazione previsto da Schengen nei collegamenti marittimi e aerei con la Spagna, reintroducendo i controlli di frontiera.
Si tratta di una misura straordinaria, adottata per tutelare la sicurezza nazionale e prevenire possibili ripercussioni per la nostra Nazione. La misura sarà mantenuta in vigore solo per il tempo necessario, con particolare attenzione a limitare qualsiasi impatto sui flussi turistici estivi.
Parallelamente, l'Italia è pronta a sostenere ogni iniziativa europea di supporto alle istituzioni spagnole necessaria per ristabilire il pieno controllo delle frontiere esterne dell'Unione e affrontare con determinazione la situazione in corso.
Difendere i confini significa difendere la sicurezza dei cittadini, contrastare l'immigrazione irregolare e colpire le reti criminali che trafficano esseri umani.
Susiladies ottaa mittaa Ruotsista tänään klo 16 Liettuan Klaipedassa. Ottelu on katsottavissa Liettuan Koripalloliiton YouTube-kanavalta
📺👀 https://t.co/JCdj59Vcfm
Let’s go! 🇫🇮🐺
#susiladies#eurobasketwomen