rahulfx1

1 day ago

🚨CASE SUBMISSIONS ARE NOW OPEN🚨 Every unresolved trader case deserves to be heard. Behind every denied payout, account termination, KYC issue, execution dispute, or rule change is a trader looking for answers. Many of those stories never reach the public. We’re changing that. If you’ve experienced an issue with a prop firm, you can now submit your case directly to PropWatch using the form below. Every submission will be reviewed. Where appropriate, we’ll verify the information, seek the firm’s response, and publish evidence-based coverage to help increase transparency across the industry. Not every case will become a public report. But every submission will be read. Our goal isn’t to create outrage. It’s to create accountability. If your experience can help protect other traders or help resolve your own case—we want to hear it. Submit your case below. https://t.co/U939l0tV2h Join our Discord aswell- https://t.co/jWqYCNiJVn

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨CASE SUBMISSIONS ARE NOW OPEN🚨

Every unresolved trader case deserves to be heard.

Behind every denied payout, account termination, KYC issue, execution dispute, or rule change is a trader looking for answers.

Many of those stories never reach the public.

We’re changing that.

If you’ve experienced an issue with a prop firm, you can now submit your case directly to PropWatch using the form below.

Every submission will be reviewed. Where appropriate, we’ll verify the information, seek the firm’s response, and publish evidence-based coverage to help increase transparency across the industry.

Not every case will become a public report.

But every submission will be read.

Our goal isn’t to create outrage.

It’s to create accountability.

If your experience can help protect other traders or help resolve your own case—we want to hear it.

Submit your case below.

https://t.co/U939l0tV2h

Join our Discord aswell- https://t.co/jWqYCNiJVn

13

20

14

2

1K

1 day ago

@propwatchmedia joker

0

1

0

8

rahulfxx retweeted

1 day ago

Interesting Logic. We were first, so we can criticize anyone.”

7

15

8

0

807

rahulfxx retweeted

1 day ago

🚨PATRICK WIELAND : Funny how “review sites” are only a problem when they aren’t yours. Running a review platform, promoting affiliate codes, marketing prop firms, and sharing giveaways is apparently fine… Until someone else does it. If you’re going to criticize the entire review-site ecosystem, start with applying the same standard to your own platform. That’s not exposing hypocrisy. That’s weaponizing it against your competitors. Standards only matter if they apply to everyone. @Patrickwieland @onlypropfirms

15

24

17

0

2K

@propwatchmedia @QtFunded

2 days ago

0

4

0

50

rahulfxx retweeted

2 days ago

🚨 WHAT IS THE QT FUNDED VS CHRIS EKE DISPUTE ABOUT? Here’s a timeline of the dispute based on documents and statements shared publicly by trader Chris Eke. 📅 25 August 2025 Chris says he requested a $5,381 payout after meeting QT Funded’s payout requirements. 📞 Risk Call Instead of receiving the payout, Chris says he was asked to attend a call with QT Funded’s Head of Risk, Matthew. According to Chris, he was told: • His relationship with QT Funded had “run its course.” • His funding would be terminated. • He would no longer be able to purchase accounts from QT Funded or affiliated businesses. Chris says this affected: • $400,000 Funded • $200,000 Phase 2 • $200,000 Phase 1 Chris also claims no rule breach, policy violation, or misconduct was alleged during the call. 📄 The NDA Chris says QT Funded told him they would still process his payout and part of his refunds if he signed a “final contract.” After reviewing the document, Chris says he discovered it was a Non-Disclosure & Non-Disparagement Agreement (NDA). Chris says he refused to sign because he believed his payout had already been earned under the original agreement. 💬 Support & Emails Chris says he contacted live support, spoke with Head of Operations Fes, and exchanged several emails with QT Funded. According to Chris, the company maintained that the payout and refund would only be processed if he signed the proposed agreement. ⚖️ Court Proceedings Chris says he instructed a solicitor to review the matter before filing legal proceedings in the UK. Documents shared publicly indicate QT Funded argues the claim was filed against the wrong legal entity rather than disputing every aspect of Chris’s account. Chris disputes that position, arguing the UK entity handled customer-facing operations and payment administration in practice. 📌 Current Status The case remains ongoing, and the court has not yet issued a final decision. PropWatch will continue following the case and publish any official response from QT Funded or further court developments. @QtFunded @Finn_QTFunded @AlexQuantTekel @JamesQuantTekel @ChristosEke

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨 WHAT IS THE QT FUNDED VS CHRIS EKE DISPUTE ABOUT?

Here’s a timeline of the dispute based on documents and statements shared publicly by trader Chris Eke.

📅 25 August 2025
Chris says he requested a $5,381 payout after meeting QT Funded’s payout requirements.

📞 Risk Call
Instead of receiving the payout, Chris says he was asked to attend a call with QT Funded’s Head of Risk, Matthew.

According to Chris, he was told:
• His relationship with QT Funded had “run its course.”
• His funding would be terminated.
• He would no longer be able to purchase accounts from QT Funded or affiliated businesses.

Chris says this affected:
• $400,000 Funded
• $200,000 Phase 2
• $200,000 Phase 1

Chris also claims no rule breach, policy violation, or misconduct was alleged during the call.

📄 The NDA
Chris says QT Funded told him they would still process his payout and part of his refunds if he signed a “final contract.”

After reviewing the document, Chris says he discovered it was a Non-Disclosure & Non-Disparagement Agreement (NDA).

Chris says he refused to sign because he believed his payout had already been earned under the original agreement.

💬 Support & Emails
Chris says he contacted live support, spoke with Head of Operations Fes, and exchanged several emails with QT Funded.

According to Chris, the company maintained that the payout and refund would only be processed if he signed the proposed agreement.

⚖️ Court Proceedings
Chris says he instructed a solicitor to review the matter before filing legal proceedings in the UK.

Documents shared publicly indicate QT Funded argues the claim was filed against the wrong legal entity rather than disputing every aspect of Chris’s account. Chris disputes that position, arguing the UK entity handled customer-facing operations and payment administration in practice.

📌 Current Status
The case remains ongoing, and the court has not yet issued a final decision.

PropWatch will continue following the case and publish any official response from QT Funded or further court developments.

@QtFunded @Finn_QTFunded @AlexQuantTekel @JamesQuantTekel @ChristosEke

8

27

19

1

1K

rahulfxx retweeted

2 days ago

🚨 QT FUNDED FACES COURT DISPUTE AFTER TRADER ALLEGES PAYOUT WAS WITHHELD A trader @ChristosEke has publicly shared what appears to be months of emails, Discord messages, support chats, legal filings, and an NDA relating to a dispute with QT Funded. According to the trader: • A $5,381 payout entered processing on 25 August 2025 after all trading requirements had allegedly been met. • Instead of receiving the payout, he says he was presented with a proposed NDA / Non-Disparagement Agreement tied to a settlement offer. • The trader alleges he refused to sign because he believed the payout had already been earned under his original agreement. • He subsequently filed legal proceedings, and has shared court documents indicating that the matter has progressed through the court system. • Documents shared by both sides indicate the dispute includes questions about the contractual relationship and which legal entity is the proper defendant, rather than only the underlying payout itself. The trader has now released hundreds of pages of supporting material along with a detailed video explaining his position. @QtFunded ’s communications shown in the shared material indicate the company maintained its position, referenced its terms and conditions, and disputed the trader’s legal arguments. This matter is now being argued through legal channels. If either party has additional information, clarification, or wishes to provide an official statement, PropWatch is open to publishing it. No payout dispute should have to reach this stage. The industry needs transparency—not prolonged legal battles.

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨 QT FUNDED FACES COURT DISPUTE AFTER TRADER ALLEGES PAYOUT WAS WITHHELD

A trader @ChristosEke has publicly shared what appears to be months of emails, Discord messages, support chats, legal filings, and an NDA relating to a dispute with QT Funded.

According to the trader:

• A $5,381 payout entered processing on 25 August 2025 after all trading requirements had allegedly been met.
• Instead of receiving the payout, he says he was presented with a proposed NDA / Non-Disparagement Agreement tied to a settlement offer.
• The trader alleges he refused to sign because he believed the payout had already been earned under his original agreement.
• He subsequently filed legal proceedings, and has shared court documents indicating that the matter has progressed through the court system.
• Documents shared by both sides indicate the dispute includes questions about the contractual relationship and which legal entity is the proper defendant, rather than only the underlying payout itself.

The trader has now released hundreds of pages of supporting material along with a detailed video explaining his position.

@QtFunded ’s communications shown in the shared material indicate the company maintained its position, referenced its terms and conditions, and disputed the trader’s legal arguments.

This matter is now being argued through legal channels.

If either party has additional information, clarification, or wishes to provide an official statement, PropWatch is open to publishing it.

No payout dispute should have to reach this stage.

The industry needs transparency—not prolonged legal battles.

8

20

11

0

1K

2 days ago

2 days ago

🚨 Another delayed payout complaint involving Titan Capital Markets. A trader @GoldInsiderX has contacted PropWatch claiming that a $2,049.70 payout requested on June 18 remains unpaid more than 30+ days, despite sharing payout confirmation and weeks of support conversations & later removed from the support system. We contacted Titan Capital before posting. No reply. When traders wait over a month for their money, transparency isn’t optional. If there is a legitimate reason for this delay, the trading community deserves a transparent explanation. Silence only creates more uncertainty. @TitanCapMarkets , what’s happening with this payout?

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨 Another delayed payout complaint involving Titan Capital Markets.

A trader @GoldInsiderX has contacted PropWatch claiming that a $2,049.70 payout requested on June 18 remains unpaid more than 30+ days, despite sharing payout confirmation and weeks of support conversations & later removed from the support system.

We contacted Titan Capital before posting.

No reply.

When traders wait over a month for their money, transparency isn’t optional.

If there is a legitimate reason for this delay, the trading community deserves a transparent explanation.

Silence only creates more uncertainty.

@TitanCapMarkets , what’s happening with this payout?

8

16

15

1

974

0

1

0

42

@propwatchmedia @GoldInsiderX @TitanCapMarkets

2 days ago

0

3

0

55

rahulfxx retweeted

2 days ago

🚨 Another delayed payout complaint involving Titan Capital Markets. A trader @GoldInsiderX has contacted PropWatch claiming that a $2,049.70 payout requested on June 18 remains unpaid more than 30+ days, despite sharing payout confirmation and weeks of support conversations & later removed from the support system. We contacted Titan Capital before posting. No reply. When traders wait over a month for their money, transparency isn’t optional. If there is a legitimate reason for this delay, the trading community deserves a transparent explanation. Silence only creates more uncertainty. @TitanCapMarkets , what’s happening with this payout?

8

16

15

1

974

2 days ago

@propwatchmedia 💩

0

1

0

25

rahulfxx retweeted

3 days ago

🚨 PATRICK WIELAND, THE PROP INDUSTRY DESERVES FACTS-NOT RAGE BAIT. If your content strategy is to throw accusations at entire groups, mock creators based on nationality, and label everyone “paid” without presenting concrete evidence, that’s not investigative journalism—it’s outrage farming. If a specific review page acted improperly, present the receipts. If not, stop using broad accusations to drive engagement. The prop industry needs transparency, accountability, and evidence—not stereotypes and viral outrage.

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨 PATRICK WIELAND, THE PROP
INDUSTRY DESERVES FACTS-NOT RAGE BAIT.

If your content strategy is to throw accusations at entire groups, mock creators based on nationality, and label everyone “paid” without presenting concrete evidence, that’s not investigative journalism—it’s outrage farming.

If a specific review page acted improperly, present the receipts.

If not, stop using broad accusations to drive engagement.

The prop industry needs transparency, accountability, and evidence—not stereotypes and viral outrage.

14

21

15

0

2K

rahulfxx retweeted

3 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: E8 MARKETS FIRES BACK AT MAJOR TRADING INFLUENCER. What started as viral allegations has now turned into one of the biggest public disputes in the prop industry. Influencer Eze Kingsley Ohaji / @ohajielom claimed E8 Markets failed to process withdrawals totaling $94,000 and warned traders against the firm. E8 Markets has now publicly responded with a very different version of events. According to the firm: • During evaluation, the trader allegedly risked 4% on a single trade idea. • The firm says it contacted him directly, explained its risk expectations, and communicated that it looks for traders risking around 1% per trade idea. • Despite those concerns, E8 says it gave him a second chance by issuing a fresh $500,000 sim-funded account. • E8 then alleges that on the new account, the trader again risked 7% on a single trade idea, which the firm says violated its risk-management rules. The firm’s public response has shifted the conversation, with many traders now debating whether the original allegations told the full story. This is quickly becoming one of the biggest discussions in the prop trading community. What’s your take? Did @E8Markets provide enough evidence, or do you still have questions?

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨 BREAKING: E8 MARKETS FIRES BACK AT MAJOR TRADING INFLUENCER.

What started as viral allegations has now turned into one of the biggest public disputes in the prop industry.

Influencer Eze Kingsley Ohaji / @ohajielom claimed E8 Markets failed to process withdrawals totaling $94,000 and warned traders against the firm.

E8 Markets has now publicly responded with a very different version of events.

According to the firm:

• During evaluation, the trader allegedly risked 4% on a single trade idea.
• The firm says it contacted him directly, explained its risk expectations, and communicated that it looks for traders risking around 1% per trade idea.
• Despite those concerns, E8 says it gave him a second chance by issuing a fresh $500,000 sim-funded account.
• E8 then alleges that on the new account, the trader again risked 7% on a single trade idea, which the firm says violated its risk-management rules.

The firm’s public response has shifted the conversation, with many traders now debating whether the original allegations told the full story.

This is quickly becoming one of the biggest discussions in the prop trading community.

What’s your take? Did @E8Markets provide enough evidence, or do you still have questions?

13

22

12

1

2K

rahulfxx retweeted

3 days ago

🚨 ANOTHER RISEPAY DISPUTE 🚨 A trader @hereisgoldguy has publicly alleged that RisePay rejected his account after he submitted the required documents, completed verification, and before receiving his first payout. According to the trader, he received a generic email stating that RisePay could not offer its services, without a specific explanation for the decision. The case adds to ongoing concerns surrounding @rise_pay within the prop trading community. Traders deserve clear, transparent explanations—not generic rejection emails. @rise_pay

propwatchmedia's tweet photo. 🚨 ANOTHER RISEPAY DISPUTE 🚨

A trader @hereisgoldguy has publicly alleged that RisePay rejected his account after he submitted the required documents, completed verification, and before receiving his first payout.

According to the trader, he received a generic email stating that RisePay could not offer its services, without a specific explanation for the decision.

The case adds to ongoing concerns surrounding @rise_pay within the prop trading community.

Traders deserve clear, transparent explanations—not generic rejection emails.

@rise_pay

28

42

33

1

2K

rahulfxx retweeted

3 days ago

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 NYS Markets’ “FREE $5K Account” campaign has sparked major backlash across the prop trading industry. Millions of views. Hundreds of creators and trading pages promoted it. Thousands of traders waited through nearly 2 hours of live streaming expecting a FREE $5,000 funded account. At the end of the event, it was revealed that traders would still need to pay an activation fee after passing — effectively making it a “pass now, pay later” model rather than a no-cost funded account. The announcement has triggered widespread criticism, with many traders saying the promotion did not match the expectation created by the marketing. The firm @NYSMarkets ’s Trustpilot rating has fallen to 1.9/5, with recent reviews expressing frustration over the promotion and alleging misleading marketing and scam-like practices.

36

67

26

3

8K

rahulfxx retweeted

4 days ago

🚨 $150,000 GIVEAWAY IS NOW LIVE 🚨 How to Enter: ✅ Follow @propwatchmedia, @fundedfamily, @elpatronfff & @rahulfxx ✅ Like this post ✅ Repost & Quote this post ✅ Comment why you want to trade with Funded Futures Family ✅ Join the Discord: https://t.co/jkuBs9XjrA

0

2

1

0

30

4 days ago

🚨 $150,000 GIVEAWAY IS NOW LIVE 🚨 How to Enter: ✅ Follow @propwatchmedia, @fundedfamily, @elpatronfff & @rahulfxx ✅ Like this post ✅ Repost & Quote this post ✅ Comment why you want to trade with Funded Futures Family ✅ Join the Discord: https://t.co/jkuBs9XjrA

4 days ago

🚨 $150,000 GIVEAWAY IS LIVE 🚨 We’ve partnered with @fundedfamily to give 3 traders the opportunity to win: 🏆 3 × $50,000 Premier+ Futures Accounts How to enter: ✅ Follow @propwatchmedia , @fundedfamily & @elpatronfff ✅ Like this post ✅ Repost & Quote this post ✅ Comment why you want to trade with Funded Futures Family ✅Join our Discord - https://t.co/jWqYCNiJVn All Rules Must. 💸 Planning to purchase an account? Use code PROPWATCH for an exclusive discount. 🏆 3 winners will each receive a $50,000 Premier+ Account. The most engaging entries may receive additional attention during the selection process. Good luck to everyone. 🚀

189

281

240

15

9K

0

2

1

0

30

4 days ago

@propwatchmedia @fundedfamily @elpatronfff i want to do futures brother pleasee

0

2

0

88

rahulfxx retweeted