A set of exclusive stories based on CBSE's tenders and internal documents exclusively accessed by HT.
May 30: https://t.co/LrG0QJn072
May 31: https://t.co/JvnaT1NRQM
June 1: https://t.co/C3Gi14FjxU
June 2: https://t.co/XIVuhROP9Q
STAY TUNED..MORE LINED UP
🇮🇳 🏝️ India set to invest billions in strategic, remote island
On Great Nicobar, bulldozers are tearing into forests home to one of Earth's most isolated people — part of India's ambition for a $9 billion megaport, airport and city. Designed to rival China's investments around the Indian Ocean, New Delhi's project will be built on a site offering a naval presence far closer to Southeast Asia than India's mainland
I want to make a clear statement regarding cough syrup use in children and in general. This is especially for those idiotic physicians who still prescribe cough syrups for children even in 2025.
Please stop prescribing cough syrups to children, especially in a country like India where public healthcare is not evidence based and proper vigilance and scrutiny of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines is zero.
The routine use of conventional cough syrups is not recommended due to limited benefit and safety concerns. Most guidelines advise supportive care and highlight that cough in children is usually self-limiting. Overall, major guidelines suggest against routine OTC cough/cold meds for common-cold cough in kids. Honey (>1 yr.) is reasonable; otherwise supportive care.
Age related recommendations:
Under 4: skip cough syrups.
4–6: avoid, especially opioid cough syrups.
6–11: can be used cautiously, but evidence is very limited. Again never use opioids; avoid benzonatate.
12–17: no opioids; even dextromethorphan use should be cautious because abuse risk of this is high in this group.
Adults: routine cough syrups aren’t recommended.
≥65: avoid sedating/anticholinergic combos; check interactions; always favour non-drug options.
What actually helps
Honey (for anyone >1 year) for a few days at night time can modestly ease cough.
For those thinking that "natural" options are better, please avid OTC Ayurvedic and Herbal cough syrups because [1] they contain multiple herbs that can interact in the body and cause organ damage or interact with other medicines to cause harm and [2] they are not adequately tested for safety or benefits and are directly marketed without evidence and [3] the doses mentioned in those Ayurvedic bottles are not scientifically identified, but the company's arbitrary doses, which may not be safe for all, or all ages. Read the label!
And for those thinking herbal is unsafe, so lets go with Homeopathy cough syrups, please don't even tough those with a 10ft pole because not only they have multiple herbs, but also high levels of alcohol which is never safe for children or adults and will have high chances of misuse/ addiction later on. Read the label!
Do not routinely and randomly check for vitamin D levels.
If found incidentally low, do not routinely start taking vitamin D supplements.
Yes, vitamin D supplement intake increases vitamin D levels (duh!)…
…but it does not impact health in any clinically meaningful way in adults who randomly check and routinely consume based on an incidentally identified abnormal report.
The most wasteful health intervention is checking Vitamin D randomly in apparently healthy adults and then consuming a supplement for it.
Body fat distribution predicts the pace of cardiovascular system aging, with sex-specific patterns, and protective effect of estrogen
https://t.co/2oe2aNGclR
Geneticist Sir Paul Nurse discusses India's evolving research landscape, budget cuts' effects, cancer trends, and AI's role in diagnostics and treatment.
https://t.co/wlDJM7C4BX
(✍️@RamblingBrook)
Amidst all the wild and fake claims about the trailblazer pilot, re-upping my interview for @AFP with Sq Ldr Shivangi Singh, who I met (with her husband) just days before the latest India- Pakistan hostilities.
Several structures around us targeted. Windows shattered. Smoke billowing. Spent an hour huddled in a basement. Hundreds trying to flee the frontier region on foot, cars and whatever other modes available. Women, children and men in groups on both sides of the road. @AFP
YOU CAN ENJOY YOUR CHICKEN DINNER.
This is why we need health reporters to have scientific temperament, have basic medical science paper reading skills, have the aptitude to ask right questions and provide a version of this news that informs rather than fearmonger.
This study claimed that weekly consumption of 300g and above of chicken meat was associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal cancers. This is not what the study actually said at all.
The study actually revealed that there are clinical researchers who are biased, who invest in poor methodology to drive their pre-conceived conclusions, are prejudiced and manipulate data using statistical torture to cherry pick outcomes they want to.
In under 2 weeks of peer review, leaving alone many important questions and variables that affect the outcome of this study, and without addressing major factors that promote cancer causation, the authors have published a study in a legit, substandard indexed journal called Nutrients to drive their prejudices against the meat eating community. Detailed alcohol use, physical activity, weight dynamics, genetics, family history of cancer, type of chicken meat (fried or boiled or grilled, processed or unprocessed) were left out intentionally.
The same authors group are well known to consistently publish studies on "benefits" of vegan/vegetarian diets and demonize meat eating communities.
Agreed, a "predominantly" plant based diet is metabolically healthier when compared to a "predominantly" meat (processed) based diet, but this outright generalization of 300g of chicken meat a week - calling it "cancer causing" is not just bad science, it's prejudiced manipulation of scientific data. It's garbage.
Rinse, repeat - everyday in the outpatient.
The antibiotics and paracetamol you took as a young adult is not the cause for your cirrhosis in adulthood.
Consuming sugar does not cause diabetes and taking insulin does not damage the kidneys.
Walking is not really an exercise.
And oils and fats do not make you fat.