@MccardJoseph@InterstellarUAP Being is not consciousness. Being is the structure, the Logos. Consciousness is the act of resonance—a mode of knowing, not the source of reality. Faggin's error is yours too: you treat the mirror as the face."
@MccardJoseph@InterstellarUAP Being fragments itself while remaining one—that is an act. An act requires an agent. Being acts, so Being was before the act. You cannot avoid this by saying 'time is in question.' Beyond time, there is a logical order: source → manifestation."😀
@MccardJoseph@InterstellarUAP If Being is not without the Other, then where did this Other come from? If it arose from Being, then Being existed before it. If it did not arise from Being, then it is a second force—and that is dualism
@MccardJoseph@InterstellarUAP Consciousness is the act in which potential becomes reality for itself. A seed cannot be both seed and tree at the same time. It is either a seed or a tree — but it contains the path from one to the other. Consciousness is the moment when that becoming is experienced
@IAI_TV This theory essentially describes a 'brain in a vat' scenario—consciousness is an internal model, meaning you never directly access the outside world, only your brain's simulation of it.
@newscientist Evolution doesn't create new mathematics, it reveals what was already there. The newborn's brain is not a blank slate for numbers, but a receiver for a numerical universe.