@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@bballbreakdown please make a post clarifying for everyone if the ‘block’ on Fox by anunoby on the layup attempt with 9 seconds left was a foul or not. Considering the initial contact to the ball and later contact to the wrist whilst Fox was still in control of the ball.
@LewSidRaps@Heyv7o9@Knightsinspace@tonycon13@bansky Incidental contact: contact that has no effect on the play.
The contact to the wrist was absolutely not incidental so that’s irrelevant, and because Fox never lost control of the ball he is still in shooting motion and the contact to the wrist is a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@ponchowildcat@JonnyRoot_ People need to stop posting this as proof it’s not a foul.
Because the ball is not dislodged by anunoby, Fox is still in shooting motion and any contact to the wrist or arm is considered a foul.
@RyTheGoat_@JonathanJWagner People need to stop posting this and thinking it’s not a foul. Just because anunoby makes contact with the ball, he can’t make contact with the wrist because he doesn’t dislocate the ball, Fox is still in complete control hence the contact to the wrist is a foul.
@RyTheGoat_@JonathanJWagner People need to stop posting this and thinking it’s not a foul. Just because anunoby makes contact with the ball, he can’t make contact with the wrist because he doesn’t dislocate the ball, Fox is still in complete control hence the contact to the wrist is a foul.