Pearl isn't calling out hypocrisy out of love for the church, she is doing so to demonstrate that, from the strictly utilitarian red pill perspective, the chruch/Christianity is obsolete in 2026 and has nothing to offer men.
The OP is correct, she constantly countersignals every aspect of Christian morality as regards sex and the relationship between men and women, apart from a vague appeal for men to lead women.
As an example she regularly says in her content that there is a hierarchy with God on top followed by Man, Woman and Children. Yet the thrust of her content is that because women have rebelled against male authority via feminism and other related developments (which is true), this means that men have license to respond by rebelling against God, by placing the self and its desires above all else.
She is effectively arguing that Adam was justified in following Eve into sin. It's ultimately subversive
@Ligonier It's interesting how the warning is always against making marriage and children an idol, but never against making your degree and career an idol.
@pearlythingz No one should be celebrating a family getting blown up, but at the same time the flavor of redpill you push places pornographic sex on tap and "living life on your own terms" as the highest good for men. So Adam22 is an exemplar, no?
@CaudilloNuclear Yes, all of them displayed weakness in that area. The inability to control your lust is a weakness, just how it is. That said, almost none of us are in a position to judge, at best you can simply note the indiscretion in others and use it to build resolve in your own life.
Nobody gets kinder, happier, more content, smiles more, laughs more, or more joyful once they absorb the anti-loyalist tropes/lingo. Nobody does. Stuff is supernatural, man. Just makes you miserable and loathsome from the inside out. Why Thomas Hutchinson called it "discontentment" derived from the "evil one"
@Acyn A common origin story for us Trump 2016 millennials was being red pilled in part by Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012. Might be the same for Gen Z and younger wrt to Massie.
No, it simply demonstrates how much Fox News boomers still control the GOP. Trump transforming 2016 MAGA into the GOP establishment, but with spicy rhetoric delayed the reformation 2016 MAGA was about by 10 or 20 years, when that Fox News cohort finally leaves the scene. It'll still come becase the circumstances that drove 2016 MAGA will remain.
The response to this is that Lawler is in a competitive district that is important to keep in a tight House race.
So it's all about keeping the House majority which is why we need to spend record amounts to primary a safe Republican seat in Massie when that money could have been spent in actual close contests
Ok, then don't put immigration front and center when the actual issue is keeping R majorities. If the real issue is keeping the majority, such that we have to tolerate people who are bad on immigration in competitive districts, then why are spending records being broken in safe districts that could be used to shore up the majority elsewhere?
@Blondes_tweets@mig29tomcat@YouTube Its the 900th iteration of Optics vs "We have to DO something." One camp does something silly, and the other is like "told you so" and this triggers a mutual crashout. Virtually everyone on all sides of this thing are so thin skinned its unreal.
@asukagrypr Thing is at this point anyone who is misrepresenting or misunderstanding Nick is typically a perma-critic arguing in bad faith. A million clips won't change anything for them.