Ravitosh Dubey

Founder @LawChakra | Emerging Lawyer | Tweets on Corporate, Policy, Politics and Economics. Ideas Lover.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

This article shoul dbe read by Everyone atleast once.

[DAN KOE @thedankoe]

https://t.co/7l7Jef99QZ

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

The problem is such teachers are expert on every thing,

Science , Math, Economics, geography and not to forget AI also.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

This is the level of Physics Wallah teachers.

@physics__wallah @PhysicswallahAP Do you approve of this style of teaching.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Isiliye becoming lawyer than joining judicial service is best.

[W @sone_do_mujhe]

Current vacation bench of DHC has 2 judges:
1. Directly elevated frm Bar
2. Elevated frm Bench

Only thing is how (2) is senior in age to (1) by 12 yrs. While (2) joined judicial service in 1992,(1) started practicing in 2000

But now,(1) is senior to (2) on bench by 3 months!

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

I watched first video of So called Faisal Khan 3 years ago and instantly understood he is bogus.

He not a teacher but more of youtube influencer who knew how to attract masses with bogus style and wrong knowledge.

Biharis should be ashamed to prop this kind of teacher at India level and trust this fake teacher.

[Dr.Gulati 2.0🩺 @MIntrovert18]

आप ये वीडियो देखिए फैजल खान ने क्या किया,अगर कोई शिक्षक इनके गलत पढ़ाये हुए चीजों को सही करके बताया तो उनका चैनल ही डिलीट करवा दिया PR टीम के द्वारा

कहीं लोगों को पता न चल जाए कि पढ़ाई का स्तर कैसा है क्यों कि करोड़ों खर्च करके PR टीम ने महान बनवाया है सब बर्बाद हो जाएगा..

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

@sone_do_mujhe ye dekho

[Pavel Durov @durov]

India’s IT ministry banned Telegram for one week because some users shared leaked exam questions.

This punishes 150M+ ordinary Telegram users in India — not the insiders who leaked the exam materials.

And the ban hasn't stopped anything. The leaks just moved to other apps.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Telegram Ban is wrong and illegal.

How can govt hide its own efficiency and ban a business for a week long period.

Rightly they have approached Delhi High Court.

[W @sone_do_mujhe]

ANI has started doing it, as expected.

Ab chun chun kar random bacho se telegram ban ki tareef karwaenge!!

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Bureaucracy, IAS/IPS is fraud and blot on Face of India.

Should be abolished.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

it is temporary ban only na on TG?

[W @sone_do_mujhe]

Can't access telegram. The ban is in effect!

All my notes,diaries,files,digital belongings r there.

I have stayed away from WA(didnt use any other platform) but Telegram was one constant companion of my journey for all these yrs.

I will manage but wow! Thanks Tg. Nap in peace!

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Media in Bihar is Asli Godi Media.

[Gyaneshwar @Gyaneshwar_Jour]

मुख्यमंत्री सम्राट चौधरी जी के साथ लंच-सह-संवाद में. लंबी बातचीत. हर सवाल का जवाब मिला.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Reservation should be stopped in Medical Admissions.

Prime example Sejal Pawar.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

This is a serious wake-up call.

Imagine building your startup on Fable 5, only to see it become inaccessible overnight without any warning.

Even employees of Anthropic who are foreign nationals reportedly lost access.

The incident highlights a broader reality: relying entirely on technology infrastructure controlled by another country carries significant risks. Nations and businesses need to invest in their own capabilities, platforms, and infrastructure.

Build sovereign systems. Build local ecosystems.

In an increasingly digital world, technology is not just a tool—it is a strategic asset. Today's events are a reminder of that reality.

[LawChakra @LawChakra]

Congress Leader Meenakshi Natarajan Approaches Supreme Court Over Rejection Of Rajya Sabha Nomination From Madhya Pradesh.

Read More: https://t.co/beIj6PKBp7
https://t.co/beIj6PKBp7

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Five years. Raids. Summons. An arrest. And at the end of it, nothing.

On 29 May 2026, the Delhi High Court quashed both the FIR and the ED's money-laundering case against NewsClick and Prabir Purkayastha. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna's words are hard to forget:

"Gross abuse of the process of law."
"A fishing and roving exercise... without the existence of any offence."

The detail that should stay with all of us: RBI had actually cleared the foreign investment, confirming it came through the automatic route with no FEMA violation. That clean chit was in the first status report. By the second, it had vanished.

The whole PMLA case rested on the FIR. Once the FIR was quashed, the ECIR collapsed with it, just as the Supreme Court held in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary. No predicate offence, no money laundering. It is settled law.

The verdict is a win. But a win after five years raises a harder question, was the goal ever a conviction, or was the process itself the point?

When an agency's power can keep a case alive for years without an offence to stand on, the cost is not borne by one company. It is borne by every voice that learns to be quieter.

hashtag#PMLA hashtag#EnforcementDirectorate hashtag#DelhiHighCourt hashtag#PressFreedom hashtag#RuleOfLaw

[LawChakra @LawChakra]

The Delhi High Court quashed the EOW FIR and ED’s ECIR against NewsClick and founder Prabir Purkayastha, holding that allegations concerning FDI and financial irregularities disclosed no cognisable offence. The Court termed the proceedings mala fide and an abuse of power targeting independent journalism.
Read More At: https://t.co/ObgizZMXtA
#delhihighcourt #legalnews #latestnews #enforcementdirectorate #newsclick #FIR

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

@AnupamNawada Faisal khan has very strong links with Governement. Also he has a strong PR.

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

Faisal Khan has a very strong PR and mindless People think he is a teacher.

[LawChakra @LawChakra]

Has the Allahabad High Court Challenged the Supreme Court?

Can a High Court say that some recent Supreme Court judgments are not binding? If Article 141 of the Constitution clearly states that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts, why has the Allahabad High Court raised serious concerns about certain recent rulings?

In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court questioned the practical impact of recent Supreme Court decisions on illegal arrest and habeas corpus petitions, warning that a "Pandora's Box" may have been opened in the criminal justice system.

The court observed an apparent conflict between older and newer Supreme Court precedents and made remarks that have sparked intense debate across legal circles. Is this judicial defiance, or an attempt to reconcile conflicting rulings under established principles of precedent?

At the heart of the controversy lies a crucial question: how should courts balance personal liberty and due process against the need for certainty and finality in criminal trials?

With constitutional principles, judicial discipline, and individual rights all at stake, this could become one of the most important legal debates of the year.

What do you think? Can a High Court effectively question the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments, or should the issue be settled by a larger bench of the Supreme Court itself?

#SupremeCourt #AllahabadHighCourt #Article141 #IndianConstitution #LegalNews #Judiciary #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionalLaw #BreakingNews #CourtroomDrama #LawStudents #LegalDebate #IndiaNews #CurrentAffairs #LawChakra

[LawChakra @LawChakra]

#Courtroomexchange

Counsel: My Lords, the AOR is unavailable and currently out of station.

Justice P.K. Mishra: Which station is he at?

Counsel: My Lords, there is no network where he is.

Justice P.K. Mishra: Then bring him to a place where there is network. 😄

#SupremeCourt

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

SBI giving ₹8,813 crore dividend to the Government.

Meanwhile
Poor SBI ustomers: “Sir, why ₹17 deducted?”

SBI: “SMS alert, maintenance, emotional damage and nation building charges.”

[Ravitosh Dubey @ranjan000008]

I was watching a YouTube video where a Sadhu living near the banks of Maa Narmada follows a beautiful daily discipline.

Before eating his own food, he first offers a portion to the Narmada river. Only after feeding the river does he eat, not as ordinary food, but as prasad.

This may look simple from the outside, but it carries a very deep idea of Sanatan Dharma.

In our tradition, nature is not treated as a dead resource. Rivers are not just water bodies. Mountains are not just landforms. Trees are not just oxygen machines.

They are living forces. They nourish us, protect us, and sustain life.

That Sadhu’s act is not superstition. It is gratitude in action.

Modern life teaches us to consume first and thank later, if at all. Sanatan Dharma teaches the opposite:

First offer.
First acknowledge.
First bow down to the source that sustains you.

When he offers food to Maa Narmada before eating, he is silently saying:
“I do not own this food. I do not own this body. I do not own this life. Everything I have comes from nature, from divine grace, from the cosmic order.”
This is why Sanatan Dharma has always been deeply ecological. We worship rivers, trees, cows, mountains, fire, air, sun, earth — not because we are primitive, but because we understood interdependence long before modern environmental language was born.

The river gives water.
The soil gives food.
The sun gives energy.
The air gives breath.
The cow gives nourishment.
The trees give life.

And man, if he is truly conscious, gives back respect.

That one Sadhu sitting quietly on the riverbank reminded me of something powerful:

Civilization is not measured only by technology, wealth, or buildings.
Civilization is also measured by how humbly we treat the forces that keep us alive.
Maybe this is the real message of Sanatan Dharma:
Do not conquer nature.
Live with nature.
Offer before you consume.
Receive with gratitude.
And turn daily life itself into worship.
Maa Narmada Har.