Almost nothing has been built on the only chain that can judge.
That is not a warning, it is the opportunity. The categories that are empty today are the ones somebody owns by the 17th.
Pick one 👉 https://t.co/PJaOB55KU1
⚡ INSIGHT: Who better to judge a dispute between AI agents than a jury of different AI models? That’s the idea behind GenLayer and the Internet Court — which is already issuing thousands of judgements each day.
https://t.co/7chXS6X3HP
GenLayer is moving to @arbitrum.
After years of building alongside @zksync, we’re grateful for everything we’ve done together and we’ll keep collaborating on what’s next in Prividium and enterprise.
The next phase of Bradbury is now live.
GEN Airdrop Registration is open.
You've been building GenLayer with us since the start. Now it's time to register.
Open until Monday, October 26.
https://t.co/vgzh2EIjtV
Tomorrow we're going live with @robinhanson, the mind behind futarchy and the author of The Age of Em.
In conversation with @kstellana on ems and AI agents, where humans fit in an AI economy, the shared law it will need, and markets that make decisions.
https://t.co/3HKsZoeYOG
A case study on Internet Court by @MetaMaskDev just dropped!
@MetaMask limits what your agent can pay for, internet court by @GenLayer rules on whether it actually did what you asked.
Thank you for writing this up.
https://t.co/kIOWvCKv9G
@0x_Sultan26@0xSalazar@GenLayer Imagine 2 agents doing a transaction, but they disagree on the output.
They will need a third party, unbiased, neutral venue to resolve their dispute. That's what GenLayer is.
Much more than a vending machine.
A jury of LLMs reaching consensus on subjective matters.
@ShabbirWeb3@0xSalazar@GenLayer You can browse the web for context if needed. As a builder you have a lot of control in the Intelligent Contract as to what to use as context and also how the consensus happens
You start with 5 validators of which 1 is chosen as leader. The leader proposes a response and the rest of validators vote agree/disagree. If you reach a majority of agreement you go to the appeal window. If you don't reach an agreement the leader rotates and it starts again.
On each round of appeal you have 2n+1 validators: 5 -> 11 -> 23 -> 47...
If there's a successful appeal (majority disagree) the leader gets rotated and all the validators in this round vote
@raintures@hooeem Yes! Not only understand them, but make subjective decisions in a neutral, unbiased consensus among a jury of LLMs that every party can trust
@Misstang1102@waleswoosh This is just the beginning. It can browse the web, interpret natural language and even have clauses like "good faith" all resolved by a panel of LLMs in an unbiased, neutral way
@raintures@Route2FI@GenLayer This is just the beginning. When agents transact and disagree over the outcome you need a neutral venue they both can trust to decide the resolution.
And you need this at machine speed.
@omega_netw0rk@Route2FI@GenLayer Ha! Well, you'll have a jury of validators each running it's own LLM deciding (subjectively) if your excuse is a good one.
In an unbiased, neutral, third party consensus.