@deedydas I swear this isn't ad.
There are breakthoughts on agentic harness that don't depend just on the shell (codex, claude code, etc).
At https://t.co/sueTYfc64S, we improved a key feature of something else (our secret sauce) so any agentic system can be dramatically improved.
@fabrice_mayrand What makes agentic coding expensive it the model trying workarounds for things that would simply work.
I like https://t.co/sueTYfc64S because with it my agents can sudo, can REPL, they interact with shell apps as no one thought before.
@lucas_montano Na minha experiência, especial criando um projeto complexo do zero, só tem um jeito de realmente acelerar a codificação agentica.
https://t.co/v9Aw8AoVGJ
Eles tem um mcp único que permite que o modelo/agente não precise fazer gambiarra para executar ferramentes importantes.
@pcshipp I'm following https://t.co/v9Aw8AoVGJ closely, they have a unique feature that makes agentic coding much more powerful and no one is looking. The price tag speaks for itself.
@akmehregan One thing that saves me lot of tokens is running on https://t.co/v9Aw8AoVGJ infrastructure.
They have a unique (read patented) mcp that allows the agent use sudo, repl, so they doesn't need some common workarounds.
@AkitaOnRails@AkitaOnRails, já viu https://t.co/sueTYfcDUq?
É bem interessante porque habilita qualquer agente a interagir interativamente com o terminal.
O agente consegue, por exemplo, usar o vim (útil para um nicho, dev vim talvez?) mas mais interessante, consegue usar python em REPL!
Neste último fim de semana, eu estava em uma festa e algo engraçado aconteceu. Estava conversando com um amigo sobre o trabalho e ele começou a descrever os problemas de desempenho que estava enfrentando com o sistema de sua empresa. Ele parecia tão frust…https://t.co/MsRCbteoO5
@timmisiak I run a small company in Brazil focused on just that. We call ourselves performance engineers but what we do is pretty much what Microsoft describes as escalation engineers (a position I didn't know about until now).
@GeePawHill I've seen this over and over. I used to think that it was enough to not use concrete classes, but the interfaces instead. You make a good point. Maybe one could also add methods for transform the class to one of the base collections if it is useful, ie asMap or asList.