Tin Raven

Musician. Canary in the cage. Not Left or Right, Just Right or Wrong.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@TheProjectUnity Wise words

[Gareth Icke @garethicke]

Russia man bad.

[Ana Boulter @anaboultertv]

Who the actual fuck told Labour they had the power to ‘give children their childhood back’? I mean really????

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@LTCKilgore @Telegraph Love it.

[Neil Oliver @thecoastguy]

The panic-stricken efforts by the state to force digital ID on the proles while simultaneously securing anonymity and cover for themselves and their own is a wonder to behold.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@Keir_Starmer The arrogance.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@DrAseemMalhotra For someone with your intelligence you are amazingly short sighted.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@Keir_Starmer I wonder if you've thought that the only way you stay in power is if you put us at war... hmm...

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!

Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)

Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.

The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.

many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.

Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.

[Signal @signalapp]

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.

https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p

[Chris Wick @ChrisWickNews]

His job is to engineer civil unrest, delivering a Digital ID mandate for his WEF handlers.

This isn’t about popularity — and it never was.

What’s unfolding feels increasingly calculated, not accidental.

A steady push of policy after policy, each one framed as efficiency, safety, or modernization — yet collectively pointing toward something far more rigid underneath.

Digital identity systems. Centralized verification frameworks. Expanding requirements to access basic services in an increasingly monitored environment.

Supporters call it progress. Critics see something else taking shape: a quiet tightening of control wrapped in the language of convenience.

And the most unsettling part isn’t just the direction — it’s how normal it’s being made to feel while it happens.

Because once these systems are fully embedded, walking them back becomes almost impossible.

At that point, it’s no longer about debate.

It’s about structure.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@BGatesIsaPyscho While I agree, its an absolute shit show by the police.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@darrenpjones Who do you think you are talking to... twelve year olds?

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@TrisOsborneMP @Emurillofer Is he wrong, or are you just unable to answer?

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@politixintheuk Which people are these? His sponsors?

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@Mcnoodle27John @PeterStefanovi2 Its the only way he can stay in power.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@dshensmith I would say it is deliberate.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@JamesMelville I won't forgive you for making me listen to that.

[Tin Raven @raven_argon]

@TheProjectUnity Bluebeam...