I founded Ravinia Reading Center, only reading clinic on Earth owned and staffed entirely by speech-language pathologists. Pro-science. Uncompromising.
@markseidenberg The "science of reading" has not provided good evidence that systematic phonics is especially effective. No evidence that required SSP has improved reading outcomes in England over past decade. Here is summary of evidence over past 20 years : PsyArXiv.https://t.co/dAOPSlhMBw
Is it me or linguistics is one of the only scientific fields where non-experts think they know more than actual experts? It doesn't seem as prevalent in fields like, say, physics or medicine
I’ve always loved the way language is punctuated by places: jeans are ‘from Genoa’, denim is from Nîmes in France, suede from Sweden, mayonnaise from Minorca’s Port Mahon, damask from Damascus, sardines and sardonic from Sardinia, and spruce (both the tree and a neat appearance) from Prussia.
kinda absurd that students go through years of language/literature education in K-12 schools with almost 0 years of linguistics. It’s like teaching about living things but not have biology as a topic. If “language” is important for K-12, so is linguistics as its science
@jamie_lipp I disagree that kids need phonics. It’s a method of teaching that misrepresents how the English writing system works. Kids do not need to learn teaching methods!
When did ed reporters, not Ts, become experts on teaching K-12 kids 2 read & write? How is it possible, that Ts are suddenly fawning on them? One thing is 2 offer advice as a writer & another is 2 tell Ts how 2 teach. (1/2)