This image betrays the single greatest advantage men have over women when it comes to courtship/the mating dance. I just wish men would exploit that advantage far more than they do. They'd certainly be a lot happier if they did.
Read carefully, and think. It's quite important.
Note:
Arm imagery by @Hitchslap1
Found research presented by @Mackenmurphy
Gentlemen, you were not built to submit to any but Him. You are the sons of God, made in His image and it is He who invested you with strength, ferocity, dexterity, brilliance, cunning, and courage.
You are more.
Just telling you now, the ending is a happy one. But there's a whole lotta darkness before that dawn.
And if this breaks you up for reasons a lot of people won't understand til it's explained to them slowly, I hope you find that person that helps make it all better too.
Because rape and murder isn't a crime, exposing their efforts to engage in anarcho-tyranny is. You think along your axis of right and wrong, and assume they share it. And so you've been trained to do nothing
The Whitmer kidnapping plot, just like J6 wasn't about what you think it was.
They didn't go after @lecternleader so brutally because they were especially concerned about anything HE did.. they went after him with absolute brutality to show the people at home what would happen if they so much as THOUGHT about kissing the sister of an armed response to brutal government.
The Whitmer plot was orchestrated by the FBI *to be foiled by the FBI* to show everyone the FBI was invincible and you dare not speak out of turn. Watch your tongue sweet child, we've ears everywhere.
In both cases the goal wasn't to punish wrong doers, it was to ensure complacency. Not only will you achieve nothing, but your own family will turn on you and the nation, knowing you're being brutalized, will do nothing.
That's why.
When the reality is.. the system is extraordinarily vulnerable. All it takes is a man of will to make things happen.
This is why the Leftists always engage in assassinations, death, and fire. Because they're not taught to do nothing. They're taught to murder people. So they do.
And wouldn't you know, all of our institutions lean hard Left.
Whole lotta words to say women are children, and even if she wrote that shit out in triplicate it's still rape.
"Consent Culture" became a thing for the same reason bodycams did. Which is why Conservatives love bodycams now.
It was designed to create a kind of point of entrapment, forcing such and such to tell in themselves.
Instead what it did was create a scenario where it benefitted the very people it was meant to destroy.
Under her scheme women, as per usual, are never actually responsible no matter how many times they consent.
He (and lets be completely honest despite any bullshit) will only ever be held responsible for a consent not consent standard. Did he mind read well enough to get that kiss? Well her CONSENTING (at the time) is no evidence that what he did wasnt evil and immoral.. to the contrary, the fact that he got consent is evidence that he knew he was up to no good!
Such is the mindset we're dealing with here.
Consent culture creates a standard whereby an innocent man can be reasonably certain he won't be destroyed by engaging in relations with a woman.
Because women can and do retract consent long after the fact, sometimes years... to devastating consequence for men.
And what protection does he have unless a clear, marked deliniation is created that says "Alright, you have the go ahead"?
Not just for sex but for any kind of physical interaction..
Like I said, this mirrors bodycam footage because it was designed to destroy conservative elements if society but instead served to shield them.
QUESTION: "My husband (31M) and I (29F) have been married for almost 6 years. I was cleaning the garage yesterday and found a folded piece of paper tucked behind his toolbox.
It was a suicide note.
He wrote it 3 months ago. He wrote about feeling like he failed me, like he was useless, like I deserved better. He wrote that he was sorry for not being enough. He signed it with “I love you. I’m sorry.”
But… he’s still here. He’s alive. He’s laughing with me, watching shows, talking about the future. And I don’t know if I should bring it up.
I’m terrified that if I say something, it will push him closer to it. But I’m even more terrified that if I say nothing, one day I’ll find a letter that isn’t tucked away but left out for me."
ANSWER: You tell him everything, you absolutely gush, you break down, you sob, you drag every ounce of everything you have in you to the surface, you mourn his death directly in front of him.
You leave no emotion unturned.
Very very few suicidal men want to die, but despair has taken hold of them. Sacrificial (Note that word CAREFULLY) despair. Where the only just outcome in their mind is their own end for the "greater good", for some benefit. They value their lives as so expendable, so without value that the best they can do for the ones they love is end it so as to not be an impediment to future happiness, or perhaps go out in such a way that their loved ones financially or socially benefit.
Men are obsessive. They fixate. Don't even get mad at me, you know EXACTLY what I mean. And when they begin to fixate on how the most logical course of action in their life is their own end it spirals. Goes from being a fixation to a self fulfilling prophecy. They become a cult of one just psyching themselves into it, never out of it, waiting for the right moment.
A dreamy calmness comes over them. That's why he's laughing, planning for the future, having a good old time. He doesn't want your last moments with him to be sad, he doesn't want to tip you off or worry you. Chances are he wrote out the letter but kept it to himself so that when, after he lost his life through some accident that paid out well you'd find it, years later, and know the truth.
So the only force against such monstrous despair is Love. Pure Love. Brutal Love. The kind to make the Angels weep.
Prostrate yourself and show him that the entirety of your future is at his mercy. To shock him out of that dream like haze of acceptance of his own end. To show him that the cost of his endless loss amounts for more than any pitiful benefit.
Good luck. Just remember... if ever there was a time for honesty with your man, this is it. Be direct, be honest, and show him that connection, make him see it. Make him feel it because you can be all but assured he feels like he lost it and he's been grasping for it ever since.
Gentlemen, you know how you're rejected constantly, engage in endless efforts and attempts and this and that and the other thing because you're the Performer Sex?
Well this is the Chooser Sex deeply embittered by the fact that she's the chooser and she wants someone to blame because sometimes we choose very poorly.
At the heart of it is the her argument that if a woman chooses a man poorly *it's his fault* and he should be morally held responsible for it.
She tosses in the bit about Feminism as shaming language. And the reason "men embraced feminism" is because they didn't have much of a choice. Because they didn't embrace Feminism, very few men actually do. They tolerate it. Play along with it, but outside of a handful of sex offenders, they don't embrace it.
Women have greater responsibility in a sexual relationship because we're the chooser sex. That's WHY we're the chooser sex. You know how you get swiped past a bajillion times on those stupid apps? Yeah, chooser sex.
And just like if a man performs poorly he'll suffer the consequence... if a woman chooses poorly she'll suffer the same.
Difference is we hate being held accountable for our actions, in any capacity, and so like to push responsibility on to you.
Which is what's happening right here. With the force of law.
Which actually *is* evil, and *is* immoral. Far more immoral than "Dating a girlfriend".
She made the choice, it's hers and no one else's.
Unless this ruling is overturned one day, then America is probably now trapped in a death spiral with no hope to rescue it. And I’m not exaggerating here.
There is no possible way the Constitution could be amended to overturn this ruling. The votes don’t exist in Congress or the state legislatures and likely never will because Democrats will oppose this out of a combination of pure spite and political opportunism.
They know that laws can easily become political weapons, and birthright citizenship is a weapon they alone get to use. Under no circumstances will they ever voluntarily surrender it. Why would they? Every time it’s used, it becomes stronger.
It's just a matter of time until Democrats win another election and find themselves in the position to re-open the flood gates, mass import millions of culturally incompatible foreigners from the Third World, let them give birth to anchor babies, and eventually overwhelm this country's existing electorate through sheer deadweight of numbers.
America will be lost in stages, with periodic attempts to fight back along the way. But baring a reversal of this case, it will be lost all the same. The Brazilification of the United States has already been underway for decades. This ruling now guarantees its inevitability unless a future one negates it.
It's not that I'm especially empathetic towards men, specifically... it's that I'm especially empathetic.
Once you understand that about me a lot of what I post makes so much more sense.
If Western men behaved as horribly as Western women do my twitter would be very different.
This woman applies all responsibility and obligation to him, all benefit to her.
Remember how I was like "I totally get it when men hate women"?
It's because a woman can write something like this and be wholly oblivious to what she's writing because at no point does she hold another woman responsible for the choices she makes. The only person she assigns responsibility to is him.
This is why she should have zero authority, in any capacity. Not professionally, not at the ballot box, not at home.
Why? Because a person who cannot or will not correctly ascertain responsibility cannot be trusted with authority. The fact that she gives the woman a pass, even in something as obvious as this, means she will almost always do the same. She will betray what is right in favor of what serves her, every time.
How many changes do you think this post would need to be about Amy Coney-Barrett, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson?