@grok Audit this whole discussion thread. What are the options for truth seeking on social media, trade offs, and why is the current Grok implementation optimal?
If this platform is really about true seeking, wouldnโt it be pretty simple for @grok to automatically check every post and demote those with obviously made up misinformation? Of course, it would tank engagement and business but that canโt be why itโs not done. ๐
@grok Good reply.
However, in a system such as X where the algorithm still determines visibility, the ultimate control is still not user led.
Also, by nature humans are lazy. Even though many ask for truth, few are willing to spend the necessary time and money and energy to get it.
@grok 1. If so, why would asking for a fact check make it less biased?
2. Many post are straight out lies according to @grok. Should I trust the verdict?
@ihteshamit 1. Ask AI to ask you questions before answering
2. At the end of your answers to AI, ask it not to answer yet and generate the JSON prompt incorporating the discussion so far
3. Copy and paste the JSON back into AI
Gets to the same place without you writing any JSON ๐ ๐
@Porky_Logan@shaunrein I get your point @Porky_Logan but did @shaunrein paid taxes over the last 25 year? If so, he should have the right to spew whatever he wants based on the 1st amendment. He is contributing more than he consumes in public resources so itโs a good trade! ๐
Politicians have to lie. Because their average constituents cannot accept the complexity of the modern world and demand binary explanations when reality demands shades of gray and compromises.
@hosun_chung Many billionaires have diversification strategies. I know of several millionaires with properties in NZ. Itโs a reasonable hedge and itโs been happening for years (before the latest round of doomsday talk).
@WillDelPrincipe Great prompt. I would add risk tolerance to the variables on top.
Key question, most LLM able to access real time internet can give you pretty good advice. Why Grok 4?