RazeDen

MIT grad · ex-OpenAi Researcher
Previously worked as a Dev for 6yrs

[RazeDen @razeden0]

A 17-YEAR-OLD KID TURNED $68 INTO $750K WITH A TRADING BOT HE BUILT IN 48 HOURS ON AN IPAD

$68 to $750K is 11,029×, which is 13 doublings in a row without one loss

Binance feed → 50 markets → price gap → size → execute → log → back to the feed

the first 2 hours are yours: what it trades, what it never touches, and when it stops

the bot reads 50 markets every second, and a person reads one chart at a time

the first night paid $6,732 on $68, which is 99× before he went to sleep

the edge is not the model, it is that the window shuts before a human finishes reading it

arbitrage gaps close in seconds, so being right slowly is the same as being wrong

it runs 168 hours a week against a trader who is awake for 40 of them

50 markets → 1 gap a minute → 9 worth taking → 1 that pays the day

11,029× is one run that got posted, and the runs that went to zero do not get posted

take out the stop line and the same speed empties the account in the same seconds

save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it write the stop rules before the strategy ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@shinmurakami_sb Just try it, fam

[RazeDen @razeden0]

A GROK BOT PROMPT FOUND $1,480 UNDER A SURNAME MY MOTHER STOPPED USING IN 1998 - THE SEARCH IS FREE

the search is free and always was, and the finders who do it for you keep 20 to 40 percent

names → addresses → 50 databases → hits → claim form → back to your name

the first 4 minutes are yours: every name you have used, every address you have lived at

9 out of 10 never claim a settlement they qualify for - across 149 cases the median rate was 9%

when the notice came by email it dropped to 3%, because nobody reads a legal email

what nobody claims goes back to the company, to a charity, or to your state under your name

it is filed under the name and the address you had then, not the ones you use now

Grok Bot runs every old name against every state you lived in and fills the form for the hits

3 states → 2 names → 1 hit → $312 from a deposit I forgot leaving in 2019

my mother's came back at $1,480 under a surname she stopped using in 1998

the bot finds the file, it does not prove you are you - the state still asks for that

skip the old addresses and the search returns nothing, and you walk away calling it a myth

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@JamessBtc_ Gmgmgm

[RazeDen @razeden0]

I PRICED THE SAME 50 EMAILS ON TWO MODELS THIS MORNING - ONE COST 16 CENTS AND THE OTHER NEVER FINISHED

16 cents for 50 emails is a third of a cent each, and a person doing the same 50 takes 4 hours

inbox → cheap model sorts → expensive model drafts → cheap model checks → you send

the first 3 minutes are yours: which 12 of the 50 are worth a real reply

Grok Build 0.1 reads all 50 at $1 in and $2 out per million, and that comes to 5 cents

Grok 4.6 is $2 and $6 per million, so it only touches the 12 that carry money

sending all 50 to the expensive model costs $0.34 and reads exactly the same to the person opening it

4 hours at $20 an hour is $80 for those 50, which is $1.60 an email against $0.0032

50 emails → 12 real replies → 3 that get answered → 1 that pays for the month

12,500 emails a year is $40 on this chain and $20,000 on a person

it drafts all 50 and sends none of them - the send button was never the expensive part

drop the second read and the cheap model's mistakes go out under your name

save this and paste it into Grok - let it price your own inbox before you automate it ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@ddnabasyzadd yup)

[RazeDen @razeden0]

A GROK BOT ENGINEER LEAKED THE 45-MINUTE FILE THAT BUILDS A $100K A MONTH BUSINESS ON 4 MACHINES

four bots, four machines, $1.90 a day, all pointed at one $100,000 number

feed → scout → architect → 2 builders → gate → back to the root

what makes it a team isn't the four bots, it's the three handoffs between them

the scout hands over who ships this already and what they charge for it

the architect hands over a spec with every interface named, the builders hand back a diff

leave one of those three vague and the work goes missing exactly there

all four share one machine: same cookies, same files, same terminal, so naming them apart isolates nothing

X Search bills $5 per 1,000 calls, so a scout on 150 reads a day costs $0.75

Grok 4.6 is $2 in and $6 out per million, and it runs exactly twice

Grok Build 0.1 is $1 and $2 per million, and both builders live there

the whole desk closes the day at $2.11, under a $60 seat

$100,000 is 200 seats at $499, $50,000 is 100, $10,000 is 20

and $2.11 a day does not show up anywhere on that scale

the money was never what kept you out, the missing handoff was

Paste it into Grok - let it write your 3 handoffs first ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@lucricia_dev Yes)

[RazeDen @razeden0]

A DEVELOPER HOUR COSTS $65.38 AND A GROK BOT HOUR COSTS 8 CENTS - THAT IS 785× ON THE SAME WEEK

$135,980 a year is $65.38 an hour, and that hour only exists 8 times a day

job → tasks → the ones with a right answer → bot → the ones without → you

the first 30 minutes are yours: write down which tasks have one correct answer

a $60 seat is $1.97 a day, which is 1 minute and 48 seconds of that developer

the bot runs 720 hours a month, so the seat works out at 8 cents an hour

$65.38 against $0.08 is a 785× gap, and neither number is a forecast

the bottom 10% earn $82,460 and the top 10% earn $214,670, and the bot does not move that line

it does not replace the developer, it replaces the part of the week nobody wants

40 hours a week → 26 with a right answer → 14 without → 14 is what you are paid for

the 26 hours are the cheap half, the 14 are why the salary exists at all

hand over all 40 and you paid $1.97 to automate the half that was your job

save this and paste it into Grok - let it sort your week into the two halves first ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@sharonD4N4GBb5S ✨✨😁

[RazeDen @razeden0]

there is a government file with your name on it and money in it

9 out of 10 people never claim a settlement they qualify for. across 149 studied cases the median claim rate was 9%, and when the notice arrived by email it was 3%

nobody reads a legal email. that is the entire reason

here is the part that is not obvious: depending on how the settlement was written, what nobody claims goes back to the company, to a charity, or to your state. when it goes to the state it gets filed under your name

and then it sits there

that file is public. every state runs a free searchable database of it: uncashed checks, old deposits, closed accounts, insurance payouts, the last paycheck from a job you walked out of. about 1 in 7 people has something in one

the reason you have never found yours is stupid. it is filed under the name and the address you had at the time, not the ones you use now. a maiden name, a dorm room, an apartment you left in 2019

Astra does the part that makes it work: you hand it every name and every address you have ever had, it runs all of them against every state you have lived in, and it fills the form for the hits

i ran mine across three states. $312 from a utility deposit in 2019 i had forgotten leaving. nothing else. my mother's came back with $1,480 under a surname she stopped using in 1998

she thought i was scamming her

there are companies that do exactly this and keep 20 to 40 percent of what they find. the state search is free and always has been. they are not finding anything you could not

the prompt is one sentence: "search every state unclaimed property database for each of these names and addresses, list every hit with the state and the amount, then fill the claim form for the largest one"

it takes about four minutes

9% claim rate. 3% when it came by email. it was never that people did not want the money

go look up the address you lived at in 2019

[RazeDen @razeden0]

ROBINHOOD JUST OPENED AGENTIC TRADING TO 28 MILLION ACCOUNTS AND MY GROK BOT MADE 824$ IN 22 HOURS

824$ on $10,000 is the headline, 50 strategies tested overnight is the part that pays

one rule → research → backtest → optimizer → risk → trader → back to the rule

the only line I wrote: 10 open trades max, a stop and a target on every single one

6 trades in 22 hours, 3 up and 3 down, $11.65 against $10.81, and never $100 at risk

robinhood now lets you point your own model at a live account, and it costs $0 extra

maker fees go to 0% on the liquidity side, and a bot is the only trader that never forgets that

the research agent comes back with a new strategy every 15 minutes and never asks me anything

the developer backtests it, the optimizer finds the pair where it holds, the risk agent sizes it

the best of 50: 1,703% net, 21% drawdown, 60% win rate, 1.43 profit factor, on SUI at 90 minutes

99% of backtests die on live markets - I have tested 2,000 of them and I trade 7

50 strategies → 1 that looked perfect → 3 months in a journal → 0 cents on it today

the rails are free now and the account is open, so the only expensive thing left is being wrong

let it build the 5 agents before you connect the account ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@eljunkoazulhotm yup

[RazeDen @razeden0]

ONE GROK BOT TURNED $83 OF ETH INTO $5,920 IN 30 DAYS AND NEVER BOUGHT A SINGLE COIN

$5,920 at a 0.5% fee means $1,184,000 of volume ran through a desk that held nothing

rule → narrative → launch → fee → kill → rotate → back to the rule

the first 1 line is yours: farm fees, never touch the price, and do not waste my time

it launches a coin around a narrative and takes 0.5% of every trade that other people make

it watches how the token trades, not who is buying, so it never has to be right about anyone

a coin that stops pulling volume gets killed the same hour, and the next one is live by morning

38 launches in 30 days, 6 of them moved, and 2 of those 6 paid for the other 36

every launch and every fee lands in one log, so the whole run can be read after the fact

$83 in → $1.18M of volume → 2.44 ETH out → 0 coins held at any point

it does not need to pick a winner, it needs volume to exist somewhere and it will find it

kill the rotate step and it sits on a dead coin all month, collecting 0.5% of nothing

save this and paste it into Grok - let it write the fee rule before the first launch ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

A GROK BOT ENGINEER LEAKED THE ONE LINE THAT SAVES $841 A MONTH ON 50 AGENTS AND NOBODY POSTS IT

50 bots read the same 40 pages every night, and you paid for all 2,000 reads

charter → memory → hash → cache → bot → ledger → back to the memory

the first 6 minutes are yours: what gets cached, what never does, and how long it lives

a page that did not change costs $0.00 on the second read, and 92% of pages never change

the bot does not know it is reading a copy, and that is why nothing in your setup breaks

prices, stock and inboxes never get cached - those 3 are the only reads worth full price

1 shared memory beats 50 private ones, because bot 37 pays nothing for what bot 2 already read

the cache costs $4 a month to hold, and it is the cheapest line on the whole bill

2,500 jobs → 2,000 cache hits → 400 real calls → 1 invoice you can read in 10 seconds

a cache makes the same work cheap, it does not make the wrong work worth doing

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

ELON MADE GROK BOT FREE FOR ANYONE WHO PASTES A CANCELLED CHATGPT RECEIPT - 38,412 WENT IN ON DAY ONE

38,412 seats at $200 is $7.68M a month walking out of one building, and $92M a year

receipt → free seat → history import → endpoint swap → $60 seat → old invoices go quiet

the first 4 minutes are yours: paste the receipt, take the seat, let it drag the old threads over

the free tier scores 59 against Astra's 62 - three points, and you pay $2,400 a year for them

your whole chat history moves in 1 click, so the thing that locked you in is now the thing that leaves

point cursor and claude code at the grok endpoint and neither of them notices the model under it changed

keep one $60 seat for jobs that need a browser and a machine, and cancel the other two

$400 a month → $60 a month → $0 for the model → 3 points you will never feel

openai and anthropic stopped selling a better model months ago, they sell 3 points and an invoice

the free seat buys you the model - it does not buy you the work you meant to do with it

wait 30 days and the receipt door gets patched, and the same seat costs $200 again

save this and paste it into Grok - let it move your stack before the door shuts ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

openai reportedly offered xai a nine-figure deal to keep grok bot behind its old price. musk turned it down and cut the price the same week.

you do not try to buy a price tag unless the price tag is beating you. sam altman can outspend anyone alive, but he cannot outspend a man who enjoys this.

the offer was $340M. spread across the 2.4 million seats it was meant to protect, that is $141 a head, once.

the cut he chose instead took the seat from $200 to $60. that is $140 back in your pocket, every month, forever.

they bid $141 one time to keep you paying. he handed you $140 a month to stop. over a year that is $1,680, and it lands on your side of the table instead of his.

here is the seat they tried to pay to keep expensive, and it runs at $60 instead of $400:

-> take the $60 grok bot seat, the exact product that offer was written to protect
-> point cursor, cline and claude code at it, none of them notice the model underneath changed
-> keep one paid seat for the 10 runs a day that touch money, and send the other 390 to the cheap one
-> your $200 chatgpt seat and your $200 claude seat both go dark, and no cheque un-ships a price cut

here is the part they will fight me on: openai is not competing on the model anymore, it is bidding on the price tag. the day a lab tries to buy your discount off the table, your $200 stopped being a price and became protection money.

the full setup is in the article below. save it before the next offer lands with better terms.

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

@TeqVolt True

[RazeDen @razeden0]

sam altman said this on bloomberg, on camera, and not one post connected it to the invoice

"we will continue to keep dropping prices dramatically"

he also said they cut the price of luna by 80% a few weeks earlier, and that the goal is the best price performance at every level

so the ceo of openai is telling you, in public, that what you pay today is not what this costs. the $200 seat is the last price, not the fair one

here is the number nobody puts next to that quote. one finished agent run costs $0.42 on the paid stack and $0.03 on the open one. same job, same output, 14 times the price

400 runs a day is $168 against $12. over a month that is $5,040 against $360, so the wait for altman's dramatic drop costs you $4,680 a month per seat

here is the switch, and it takes one evening:

-> pull grok onto one nvidia card and serve it on localhost in one line
-> point cursor, cline and claude code at your own endpoint, none of them notice the model underneath changed
-> keep one paid seat for the 10 runs a day that touch money, and send the other 390 to the local one
-> your $200 chatgpt seat and your $200 claude seat both go dark the same week

here is the part they will fight me on: altman is not lying about the prices coming down. he is just not saying when. every month you wait for the drop he promised, you pay the gap yourself

Article below is hte full guide gow to set up GrokBot ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb

[RazeDen @razeden0]

AN OPENAI TESTER LEAKED THE 11-HOUR RUN THAT REPLACES A $4,000 A MONTH TOOL WITH A 4 CENT SCRIPT

the first run costs $38, every run after it costs $0.04 - a 950× drop on the same task

brief → clicks → recording → script → cheap model → back to the brief

the first 5 minutes are yours: who it is for, why it matters, what it must never click

it sees the screen and drives a CRM, an editor, a mirrored phone - 60 clicks with no API at all

you can steer it mid-run in 1 line, and it does not throw away the 3 hours it already did

11 hours against 40 minutes on the same job - most of that time it checks itself, and it makes fewer errors

the top effort tier is not the default - 1 job in 5 needs it, the other 4 just pay more

a 4-line brief beats a 40-line one, because it asks you 3 questions before it starts

1 slow run → 1 saved script → 40 replays a day → 0 minutes of your hands on the mouse

it drives the tool, it does not pick which tool is worth driving - that one stays yours

skip the script step and tomorrow you buy the same 11 hours again at full price

save this and paste it into Astra - do the job once, then read article below, it's very intresting ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

https://t.co/tRhfmHeSHb