raziahmed

Systems engineer applying technical precision to unravel social & political complexities. Evidence-driven thinker committed to finding truth beyond rhetoric.

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

I just published When Logs Lie https://t.co/bjA4SH4ZPd

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

And in a final, survival instinct almost always trumps expression when the clock hits 90+. 2/2

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

On a whiteboard, Spain wins 3-0. On a football pitch, Argentina wins on penalties after a 1-1 draw. Why? Because Spain's system requires 11 players thinking alike; Argentina's requires 11 players willing to bleed alike. Spain plays to express; Argentina plays to survive. 1/1

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@Manu_Sisti Guide

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@marryevan999 Claude

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@TommiPedruzzi 36

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@mishilicious @CMShehbaz Good gesture

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

I am a loyal T-Mobile customer writing to formally document a billing issue that has persisted for four consecutive months and has gone entirely unresolved despite multiple contacts with your customer service team and supervisors.
The Problem — By the Numbers:
After spending my own personal time this weekend meticulously reviewing my billing history, I identified exactly when and how T-Mobile began overcharging me:
PeriodMonthly BillDec 2024 – Feb 2025~$223/monthThrough Nov 2025~$261–$267/monthDec 2025 – Mar 2026$334–$348/month
Beginning with my December 21, 2025 bill, an unauthorized device charge appeared — one I never agreed to — inflating my bill by approximately $68–$82 per month. Over four months, I have been overcharged by an estimated $272–$328.
This was not a gradual rate adjustment. This was an abrupt, unexplained spike that your own representatives failed to identify across multiple calls.
The Failure of T-Mobile's Customer Service:
What makes this situation worse than the overcharging itself is the complete failure of your support structure:

I contacted T-Mobile multiple times and spoke with multiple supervisors
I spent hours on these calls with no resolution
Not a single representative proactively identified the discrepancy — I had to find it myself
A supervisor explicitly told me my bill would be reduced — it was not
The overcharging continued through March 2026 with no correction

I should not have had to sacrifice my weekend comparing bills month by month to uncover what your billing team should have caught and corrected immediately.
What I Am Requesting:

A full audit of my account from December 2025 to present
Immediate removal of the unauthorized device charge going forward
A full refund of all overcharged amounts — approximately $272–$328
Written confirmation of the resolution

If this is not resolved promptly, I will be filing formal complaints with the FCC, the BBB, and my state's Attorney General Consumer Protection Division, and will be sharing my experience publicly.
I have been a loyal customer and have watched my bill steadily rise over the past year. I stayed. What I will not accept is being charged for services I did not authorize, being given false assurances by supervisors, and being forced to do T-Mobile's billing work myself.
1:42 PM

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

I am a loyal T-Mobile customer with six lines, and I am writing to formally address an ongoing billing error that has yet to be resolved despite multiple assurances from your team.

Prior to adding my sixth line in January 2026, my bill was approximately $260 per month. The addition of the sixth line was straightforward — $35 for service and $7 for the device, following a trade-in of an older iPhone — bringing my expected total to $302 per month.

However, on February 5, 2026, I discovered that T-Mobile had been charging me $334 instead of the agreed $302 — an unauthorized overcharge of $32 per month. I promptly contacted Customer Service and escalated the matter to a supervisor, who assured me the issue would be corrected.

When my March bill arrived, I was deeply disappointed to find the same incorrect charge of $334. I contacted Customer Service once again and spoke with not one, but two supervisors, both of whom categorically assured me that the problem had been resolved and that I would receive a full refund for the two months of overcharges.

To date, neither the billing correction nor the refund has been applied to my account.

I have been patient and cooperative throughout this process, but I can no longer accept repeated assurances without action. I am formally requesting:

1. Immediate correction of my monthly bill to the agreed amount of $302.
2. A full refund of $64 for the two months of overcharges (February and March 2026).
3. Written confirmation that this issue has been permanently resolved.

If this matter is not addressed promptly, I will have no choice but to escalate my complaint to the FCC, the BBB, and my state's consumer protection agency. I trust T-Mobile values its customers and will take the necessary steps to make this right.
@TMobile

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

Already provided my information in DM but as usual lack luster response and keep dragging it forever. It has been three months @T-Mobile has been over charging me. Every time I callled and talked to a supervisor they agreed that there is an issue with over charging but no action only delayed tactics

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@TMobileHelp what information do you exactly need?

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@TMobileHelp Go ahead and fix it as it has been 90 days

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@TMobileHelp I am a loyal T-Mobile customer with six lines, and I am writing to formally address an ongoing billing error that has yet to be resolved despite multiple assurances from your team.

Prior to adding my sixth line in January 2026, my bill was approximately $260 per month. The addition of the sixth line was straightforward — $35 for service and $7 for the device, following a trade-in of an older iPhone — bringing my expected total to $302 per month.

However, on February 5, 2026, I discovered that T-Mobile had been charging me $334 instead of the agreed $302 — an unauthorized overcharge of $32 per month. I promptly contacted Customer Service and escalated the matter to a supervisor, who assured me the issue would be corrected.

When my March bill arrived, I was deeply disappointed to find the same incorrect charge of $334. I contacted Customer Service once again and spoke with not one, but two supervisors, both of whom categorically assured me that the problem had been resolved and that I would receive a full refund for the two months of overcharges.

To date, neither the billing correction nor the refund has been applied to my account.

I have been patient and cooperative throughout this process, but I can no longer accept repeated assurances without action. I am formally requesting:

1. Immediate correction of my monthly bill to the agreed amount of $302.
2. A full refund of $64 for the two months of overcharges (February and March 2026).
3. Written confirmation that this issue has been permanently resolved.

If this matter is not addressed promptly, I will have no choice but to escalate my complaint to the FCC, the BBB, and my state's consumer protection agency. I trust T-Mobile values its customers and will take the necessary steps to make this right.

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

This isn’t new; it’s Pakistan playing to its strengths as the only country with genuine working relationships on both sides of these divides. The 1971 precedent especially gives Islamabad confidence that such offers can pay historic dividends.Pakistan has repeatedly positioned itself as a diplomatic bridge — leveraging its military ties to the US, geographic proximity to Iran and Afghanistan, deep Gulf connections, and personal rapport between leaders — to facilitate talks between adversaries who otherwise wouldn’t sit together. This is exactly the playbook behind the current US-Iran offer. Here are the clearest historical parallels:1. US-China Rapprochement (1971) — The Gold StandardThis remains Pakistan’s most celebrated diplomatic achievement. Under President Yahya Khan, Islamabad acted as the secret intermediary when the US and China had no direct contact. Henry Kissinger flew from Islamabad to Beijing on a Pakistan International Airlines plane (disguised as a routine trip), using Pakistani channels to arrange the meeting that paved the way for Richard Nixon’s historic 1972 visit to China. Kissinger himself later called Pakistan’s role “pivotal” and “key,” noting that without Yahya Khan’s personal facilitation and the cover of a Pakistan stopover, the breakthrough would not have happened. The goal? Regional stability, elevating Pakistan’s global stature, and securing long-term US goodwill. It worked spectacularly — and is still taught as a textbook case of backchannel diplomacy.2. Saudi-Iran Mediation Attempts (2016–2020, with echoes into 2025–26)Pakistan has multiple times offered itself as host and shuttle diplomat between Riyadh and Tehran during flare-ups. In 2016, after the execution of Saudi cleric Nimr al-Nimr triggered a diplomatic crisis, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited both capitals and explicitly offered Pakistan as a “neutral venue” for direct talks, describing it as a “sacred mission.” In 2019–20, Imran Khan conducted shuttle diplomacy at the request of the US and others, again offering to host or facilitate. Pakistan’s logic was identical to today: strong military/financial ties to Saudi Arabia + neighborly relations and Shia population links with Iran = credible neutral broker. While full success was limited (China eventually brokered the 2023 détente), the pattern of offering mediation to prevent wider conflict and prevent spillover into Pakistan is the same.3. US-Taliban/Afghan Peace Process (2018–2021)Pakistan was indispensable in bringing the Taliban to the table with the US. Islamabad released key Taliban figures (including future deputy leader Abdul Ghani Baradar), pressured the group through its ISI networks, hosted informal meetings, and coordinated directly with American negotiators. This led to the 2020 Doha Agreement and eventual US withdrawal. US officials publicly credited Pakistan’s facilitation role. Again: using influence over one side (Taliban safe havens in Pakistan) while maintaining alliance-level ties with the US — exactly the dual leverage being applied now with Iran and Trump.4. Recent Direct Precedent: US-Iran Nuclear Backchannels (2025)Even closer to today — in early 2026 reporting, Pakistan was formally invited to participate in US-Iran nuclear-related talks hosted in Oman (and reportedly Istanbul). Pakistani officials confirmed quiet backchannel contacts had already been facilitated. Pakistan also continues to represent Iran’s diplomatic interests in Washington (via its embassy’s Interests Section), giving it a unique institutional channel.Common threads across all these cases:Personal diplomacy by the Army Chief or Prime Minister (Munir-Trump call today mirrors Yahya-Kissinger/Nixon).
Offer of Pakistani soil or logistics as “neutral venue.”
Motivation mix: prevent regional spillover that could hit Pakistan (border security, refugees, sectarian tensions), gain economic/military perks, and boost international relevance.
Results are mixed — spectacular wins (China) alongside incremental or symbolic ones (Saudi-Iran, Afghanistan) — but the role consistently raises Pakistan’s profile when big powers need off-ramps.

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

This isn’t new; it’s Pakistan playing to its strengths as the only country with genuine working relationships on both sides of these divides. The 1971 precedent especially gives Islamabad confidence that such offers can pay historic dividends.Pakistan has repeatedly positioned itself as a diplomatic bridge — leveraging its military ties to the US, geographic proximity to Iran and Afghanistan, deep Gulf connections, and personal rapport between leaders — to facilitate talks between adversaries who otherwise wouldn’t sit together. This is exactly the playbook behind the current US-Iran offer. Here are the clearest historical parallels:1. US-China Rapprochement (1971) — The Gold StandardThis remains Pakistan’s most celebrated diplomatic achievement. Under President Yahya Khan, Islamabad acted as the secret intermediary when the US and China had no direct contact. Henry Kissinger flew from Islamabad to Beijing on a Pakistan International Airlines plane (disguised as a routine trip), using Pakistani channels to arrange the meeting that paved the way for Richard Nixon’s historic 1972 visit to China. Kissinger himself later called Pakistan’s role “pivotal” and “key,” noting that without Yahya Khan’s personal facilitation and the cover of a Pakistan stopover, the breakthrough would not have happened. The goal? Regional stability, elevating Pakistan’s global stature, and securing long-term US goodwill. It worked spectacularly — and is still taught as a textbook case of backchannel diplomacy.2. Saudi-Iran Mediation Attempts (2016–2020, with echoes into 2025–26)Pakistan has multiple times offered itself as host and shuttle diplomat between Riyadh and Tehran during flare-ups. In 2016, after the execution of Saudi cleric Nimr al-Nimr triggered a diplomatic crisis, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited both capitals and explicitly offered Pakistan as a “neutral venue” for direct talks, describing it as a “sacred mission.” In 2019–20, Imran Khan conducted shuttle diplomacy at the request of the US and others, again offering to host or facilitate. Pakistan’s logic was identical to today: strong military/financial ties to Saudi Arabia + neighborly relations and Shia population links with Iran = credible neutral broker. While full success was limited (China eventually brokered the 2023 détente), the pattern of offering mediation to prevent wider conflict and prevent spillover into Pakistan is the same.3. US-Taliban/Afghan Peace Process (2018–2021)Pakistan was indispensable in bringing the Taliban to the table with the US. Islamabad released key Taliban figures (including future deputy leader Abdul Ghani Baradar), pressured the group through its ISI networks, hosted informal meetings, and coordinated directly with American negotiators. This led to the 2020 Doha Agreement and eventual US withdrawal. US officials publicly credited Pakistan’s facilitation role. Again: using influence over one side (Taliban safe havens in Pakistan) while maintaining alliance-level ties with the US — exactly the dual leverage being applied now with Iran and Trump.4. Recent Direct Precedent: US-Iran Nuclear Backchannels (2025)Even closer to today — in early 2026 reporting, Pakistan was formally invited to participate in US-Iran nuclear-related talks hosted in Oman (and reportedly Istanbul). Pakistani officials confirmed quiet backchannel contacts had already been facilitated. Pakistan also continues to represent Iran’s diplomatic interests in Washington (via its embassy’s Interests Section), giving it a unique institutional channel.Common threads across all these cases:Personal diplomacy by the Army Chief or Prime Minister (Munir-Trump call today mirrors Yahya-Kissinger/Nixon).
Offer of Pakistani soil or logistics as “neutral venue.”
Motivation mix: prevent regional spillover that could hit Pakistan (border security, refugees, sectarian tensions), gain economic/military perks, and boost international relevance.
Results are mixed — spectacular wins (China) alongside incremental or symbolic ones (Saudi-Iran, Afghanistan) — but the role consistently raises Pakistan’s profile when big powers need off-ramps.

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

This isn’t new; it’s Pakistan playing to its strengths as the only country with genuine working relationships on both sides of these divides. The 1971 precedent especially gives Islamabad confidence that such offers can pay historic dividends.Pakistan has repeatedly positioned itself as a diplomatic bridge — leveraging its military ties to the US, geographic proximity to Iran and Afghanistan, deep Gulf connections, and personal rapport between leaders — to facilitate talks between adversaries who otherwise wouldn’t sit together. This is exactly the playbook behind the current US-Iran offer. Here are the clearest historical parallels:1. US-China Rapprochement (1971) — The Gold StandardThis remains Pakistan’s most celebrated diplomatic achievement. Under President Yahya Khan, Islamabad acted as the secret intermediary when the US and China had no direct contact. Henry Kissinger flew from Islamabad to Beijing on a Pakistan International Airlines plane (disguised as a routine trip), using Pakistani channels to arrange the meeting that paved the way for Richard Nixon’s historic 1972 visit to China. Kissinger himself later called Pakistan’s role “pivotal” and “key,” noting that without Yahya Khan’s personal facilitation and the cover of a Pakistan stopover, the breakthrough would not have happened. The goal? Regional stability, elevating Pakistan’s global stature, and securing long-term US goodwill. It worked spectacularly — and is still taught as a textbook case of backchannel diplomacy.2. Saudi-Iran Mediation Attempts (2016–2020, with echoes into 2025–26)Pakistan has multiple times offered itself as host and shuttle diplomat between Riyadh and Tehran during flare-ups. In 2016, after the execution of Saudi cleric Nimr al-Nimr triggered a diplomatic crisis, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited both capitals and explicitly offered Pakistan as a “neutral venue” for direct talks, describing it as a “sacred mission.” In 2019–20, Imran Khan conducted shuttle diplomacy at the request of the US and others, again offering to host or facilitate. Pakistan’s logic was identical to today: strong military/financial ties to Saudi Arabia + neighborly relations and Shia population links with Iran = credible neutral broker. While full success was limited (China eventually brokered the 2023 détente), the pattern of offering mediation to prevent wider conflict and prevent spillover into Pakistan is the same.3. US-Taliban/Afghan Peace Process (2018–2021)Pakistan was indispensable in bringing the Taliban to the table with the US. Islamabad released key Taliban figures (including future deputy leader Abdul Ghani Baradar), pressured the group through its ISI networks, hosted informal meetings, and coordinated directly with American negotiators. This led to the 2020 Doha Agreement and eventual US withdrawal. US officials publicly credited Pakistan’s facilitation role. Again: using influence over one side (Taliban safe havens in Pakistan) while maintaining alliance-level ties with the US — exactly the dual leverage being applied now with Iran and Trump.4. Recent Direct Precedent: US-Iran Nuclear Backchannels (2025)Even closer to today — in early 2026 reporting, Pakistan was formally invited to participate in US-Iran nuclear-related talks hosted in Oman (and reportedly Istanbul). Pakistani officials confirmed quiet backchannel contacts had already been facilitated. Pakistan also continues to represent Iran’s diplomatic interests in Washington (via its embassy’s Interests Section), giving it a unique institutional channel.Common threads across all these cases:Personal diplomacy by the Army Chief or Prime Minister (Munir-Trump call today mirrors Yahya-Kissinger/Nixon).
Offer of Pakistani soil or logistics as “neutral venue.”
Motivation mix: prevent regional spillover that could hit Pakistan (border security, refugees, sectarian tensions), gain economic/military perks, and boost international relevance.
Results are mixed — spectacular wins (China) alongside incremental or symbolic ones (Saudi-Iran, Afghanistan) — but the role consistently raises Pakistan’s profile when big powers need off-ramps.

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@MillieMarconnni QUANT

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

@heygurisingh Claude

[raziahmed @raziahmed]

Daily Checklist
Before entering a stealth play:

Stock not already up 5%+ that day
Overall market not in panic mode
OI still increasing (check next day)
No earnings within DTE (unless that's the play)
Bid/ask spread < 10% of option price
Position size within risk limits