@maeamian It also demonstrates how sloppy the back-end actually is, and how far it is from being anything remotely similar to intelligence, which are important things to demonstrate in order to counter the under-informed hype around the technology.
@maeamian I mean, I do think it's worth being concerned about the system's inability to recognize and engage with obvious bad-faith arguments and hypotheticals. It's the classic tech-bro blunder of assuming that everyone will use your tools as intended, and it has consequences.
@alexunickel Also, conclusions like this make me question the methodology of the cited paper. Comparing increases in absolute dollars rather than percent-of-income obscures the fact that $123 per month is a lot more of a burden for a poor person than $167 a month is for a rich person.
@alexunickel I think it's less a scapegoat and more a bellwether. The idea that the significant presence of a company that directly profits off housing scarcity and the presence of housing scarcity are unconnected doesn't really feel to me like a reasonable assumption.
@mepstein73@12tonevideos Oh, I also don't have a phone anymore. Was mostly just getting spam calls so when my old phone broke I didn't bother replacing it.
@ImEricSchneider Also if that happens, how does cryptocurrency help? The whole system is built on economic speculation: If the economy collapses, why would anyone care who owned the numbers on a screen?
@bsmithfmly@acapellascience That's certainly true, and once these systems switch away from Proof of Work there may be an argument to be made, but they haven't done that yet and until they do I think it's best to avoid promoting their use.
@bsmithfmly@acapellascience I mean, we'll never have "all" the evidence, but it's pretty undeniable that cryptocurrencies use a huge amount of energy for no real-world gain, and cryptoart relies on cryptocurrency networks to function, so I'd say yeah, pretty much.
@maeamian like the implication here is that I'm supposed to go "oh wow, yeah, if they remove Trump, what's next, randomly blocking leftist accounts without justification?" but they're already doing that so
@maeamian Also, to answer their question, yes I would? It's not like not moderating white supremacists has stopped them from targeting leftist speech in the past.
@maeamian I don't remember It's A Wonderful Life ever being on at Christmas? Are you sure you're not thinking of A Christmas Story? 'Cause that movie a) is always on and b) sucks.
@MSNBC@NBCNewsTHINK Oh, and I agree that Biden should be above prosecuting his political opponents without evidence of wrongdoing, but that was never on the table. What's being proposed is that he prosecute a specific political opponent for whom there is a *plethora* of evidence of wrongdoing.
@MSNBC@NBCNewsTHINK And while I'm here, it doesn't actually *matter* if Trump admits wrongdoing when you can just, like, convict him of the wrongdoing he did.
@acapellascience These were the first two presidential elections since Shelby County vs. Holder, and any attempt to build the consequences of that into their model would've been complete ad hoc guesswork. I think the honest thing to do was ignore it and then clearly disclose that shortcoming.
@acapellascience I'm not sure this is entirely fair. A significant portion of what they "missed" both years was voter suppression, a thing that polls can't really account for, and they explicitly acknowledged that gap when they announced their 2020 model.