Ryan Bellman

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@kramarcollects @BlakeHHarris The Brewers aren't under-spending. There are teams that are, but they aren't one of them. Their operating income in 2025, before taxes, depreciation and amortization, was only $24m per Forbes. https://t.co/z5vVjK4asU

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@ScottGeairn @GCopelandTweets @BlakeHHarris You need to take a business class.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@wimplebottom @PH1LLy_Phan Ouch, that's embarrassing.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@NotSauer @PH1LLy_Phan And 3 is more than 0.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@RajeshP74187015 @All_22_NFL_Cuts Hah! That was the clearest DPI I've seen in a while. He was way early

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@primexmpls @barstoolsports Heel matters, but still not an issue here.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@mbalan28 @primexmpls @barstoolsports Toe drag if that's all that touches. If a toe hits first and the rest of the foot plants in a steady motion, like going tip-toed to flat-footed, then the hell can make it out. No issue either way here though.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@JHall886 @barstoolsports You're stupid and I don't respect you

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@InglesKirby @UmpScorecards In a sport where so few "points" are scored, a few bad calls can frequently make a huge difference in outcomes. There should be no debate about wanting to get every call right, and robot umps is the best way to get as close as possible.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@milobc1 @MarkModerson @UmpScorecards 4. The @UmpScorecards expected impact algorithm is arbitrarily defined by them and has been notably terrible for as far as I've followed them.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@MarkModerson @UmpScorecards Agreed. The impact algorithm is clearly flawed and has been forever. #3 on the actual scorecard should easily be #1 by situational impact. This should probably be #2 or #3

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@milobc1 @MarkModerson @UmpScorecards 1. Clearly not the AB before.
2. An AB with bases empty is general less impactful by definition. Expected impact takes no account for what actually happens after that pitch.
3. The existence of this error has nothing to do with the existence of the error in the OP.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@UmpScorecards Incorrect again. Fix your algorithm.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@SoCalGoober @UmpScorecards They are both on the scorecard. Congratulations

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@KidsGetHealthy_ @UmpScorecards Those are both literally on the scorecard. The bottom one is #3 on the scorecard and the left one is unnumbered because it wasn't theoretically as impactful.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@greg06897 @umpstrikezone 100%. How that supposed HBP stood is beyond my comprehension. Even if the ball hadn't clearly hit the bat first, he clearly offered at the pitch with his bunt attempt IMO. The only alternative was a strike.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@iamcogs @UmpScorecards Yeah, that's not how this works. It's expected runs, not actual. There's no way of knowing actual except in certain situations where the missed call would have resulted in a definitive outcome. Think missed ball 4 with the bases loaded, or missed strike 3 with 2 outs before runs.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@UmpScorecards You need to review your data source. He was way worse than this. Also, call 2 here likely resulted in 3 runs scoring for the Cubs in the first inning (if Tucker gets out as is statistically likely, Frelick's catch ends the inning). And the Brewers got a bunch of calls late.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@Fred_Williams4 @UmpScorecards Get back under your bridge, troll. You're embarrassing yourself.

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@UmpScorecards This is from @umpstrikezone

[Ryan Bellman @rdbellman]

@UmpScorecards Wrong