S

Once you learn to read, you will be forever free.

[Delhi Police @DelhiPolice]

Certain social media posts and news reports are claiming that Delhi Police has registered an FIR against the protesters at Jantar Mantar.

It is clarified that no such FIR has been registered .

Citizens are advised not to believe or circulate unverified information. Please rely only on official updates issued by Delhi Police.

#DPUpdates
@LtGovDelhi

[The Pamphlet @Pamphlet_in]

5 बजे तक भी नहीं चली Protest
@sarkarprabhat28

[Aaraadhya Saxena 🇮🇳 @ihailmyindia]

Weren't you literally begging in court to get your account unbanned, saying that you were the sole breadwinner of yr family & that Twitter payouts were yr only source of income ?

Meanwhile, he is out there having vada pav with his family, paying his bills & living his life.

[The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️) @Indian_Analyzer]

🚨 WATCH

CJP founder Abhijit reportedly left the protest site at Jantar Mantar due to the heat

He was later seen sitting inside an AC car🤯

"System Badal Denge....."

[Preet Sirohi @BhaiPreetSingh]

देश विरोधी सनातन विरोधी नारा लगने तक से

दूर खड़ा हूँ - नारा लगते ही मुंह पी ट ना शुरू कर देंगे

कुल संख्या 1000 - 550 मीडिया कर्मी कंटेंट क्रिएटर यूट्यूबर्स - 300 देशभक्त कार्यकर्ता =

150 कॉकरोच 🪳 है बस

भारत माता की जय

@DelhiPolice @DCPNewDelhi @HMOIndia

[Aravind @aravind]

I think the millions and millions of Gen-Z followers of this movement from Kansas, Palestine, Pakistan, Ivory Coast, Malaysia etc couldn't join the protests. Because they were just phones in farms that failed to instigate the Gen-Z organically in India. DS has once again failed.

[Ajay Jadeja @AjayJadeja171]

Funny how 16 wickets falling on Day 1 in the West is labeled an exciting contest between bat and ball, but the exact same scorecard in the subcontinent is branded unfit for Test cricket by so-called experts from England, Australia or even South Africa 😵‍💫

[Gems Of Replies @GemsOfReplies]

🫳🏼🎤

[Moana @ladynationalist]

Ek baar map kholke dekh leta bkl Aravali ka location? anpadh jahil !!!

[𝐏𝐒𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐓 @PSGINT_]

lets give a massive shoutout to the referee tonight

-didnt let saka take the corner after he was wasting time
-gave mosquera yellow card for time wasting
-didnt give madueke pen for a dive
-gave rice and arteta yellow card for CRYING

MASTERCLASS PERFORMANCE

[Malay Krishna @Malay4Product]

This is an unbelievable piece of work by Sarthak and something that requires amplification.

Let me explain what he found, in simple terms.

Sarthak is a Class 12 student from the 2025-26 batch, one of the 17 lakh students whose answer sheets went through CBSE's new On-Screen Marking system.

He spent days reading through CBSE's evaluation tenders, scraped all 576 tenders CBSE has issued, and tracked how the rules changed across three versions of the same tender.

The core finding is that the company that won the contract to scan and grade 17 lakh students' answer sheets is Coempt Eduteck.

Coempt used to be called Globarena Technologies. Globarena was the company behind the 2019 Telangana intermediate exam disaster, where software failures led to 3.8 lakh students getting wrong or missing marks, and 23 students died by suicide.

A government committee found systemic failure and negligence. Six months later, Globarena rebranded to Coempt Eduteck.

So a company with that track record won a contract to handle 17 lakh CBSE students. Sarthak's investigation is about how the rules were rewritten to let that happen.

The tender was issued three times.

> First tender, February 2025. It existed, then disappeared from the public GeM portal. Sarthak scraped all 576 CBSE tenders and this one was missing from the archive entirely.

> Second tender, May 2025. Four companies applied including TCS and Coempt. All four failed the technical evaluation. Cancelled.

> Third tender, August 2025. Coempt won. Between the second and third tender, a series of rule changes happened, and every single one made it easier for Coempt to qualify.

Here is what changed, one by one.

01. The old rules disqualified any company with a history of abandoning work, failing to complete contracts, or financial weakness. The new rules deleted this clause entirely. Coempt's Telangana history stopped being a barrier.

02. The old rules disqualified any company that was "blacklisted earlier." The new rules changed this to "currently blacklisted." Because Globarena rebranded after Telangana, removing the word "earlier" effectively erased their past.

03. The rules required Rs 50 crore average turnover over three years. Coempt's exact average came to Rs 50.86 crore. They cleared the bar by less than 1%. Earlier, a smaller company had asked CBSE to lower the bar to Rs 30 crore for fairer competition. CBSE refused. So the bar was kept high enough to block small players, but sat exactly low enough for Coempt to scrape through.

04. Software maturity is measured on the CMMI scale, 1 to 5. The old rules required Level 5. The new rules dropped it to Level 3. Coempt is a Level 3 company.

05. The cooling-off period for engaging retired CBSE officials was cut from two years to one. This makes it easier to use recently retired insiders to influence the process.

06. The old rules required experience with large projects of at least 5 lakh students each. The new rules removed the student count and counted cumulative answer-book volume across small projects instead. Coempt has many small fragmented university contracts. This helped Coempt and hurt TCS.

07. The old rules required bidders to own their own data centre and disaster recovery centre on Indian soil. The new rules allowed third-party MeitY-empanelled cloud hosting. Coempt runs on AWS and Azure. This helped Coempt and hurt TCS, which owns its own data centres. It also means student data is no longer on sovereign, Indian infrastructure.

08. The old rules required the bidder to own or control the complete source code of its software. The new rules deleted this. Coempt's platform runs on Microsoft's proprietary IIS, which they don't own.

09. A last-minute corrigendum, issued right before bid submission, removed CBSE's own power to blacklist the firm if its software failed catastrophically. So even a Telangana-scale failure couldn't get Coempt banned from future government tenders.

10. The penalty structure shifted from punishing mistakes to punishing delays. The old rules fined the vendor for wrong scanning, merged pages, and unscanned books. The new rules dropped those and instead levied Rs 50,000 per day for delays. This incentivises rushed scanning over accurate scanning.

11. The old rules had a hard accuracy threshold, error rate not to exceed 0.5%. The new rules removed this number entirely.

12. The old rules specified proper book and robotics scanners. The new rules just say "sufficient scanners." The definition was vague enough that, as Sarthak notes, the scanning could be done with a phone on a stand.

13. On the security side, the contract required a VAPT (vulnerability and penetration test) certified by CERT-In before go-live, and a restricted beta phase before launch. The system clearly wasn't restricted, because the other researcher, Nisarga, was able to access it and find vulnerabilities four days before go-live. So the mandatory security audit appears to have been bypassed.

These are more than a dozen rule changes, all between the failed tender and the winning tender, all pushing in the same direction, all benefiting the one company with the worst track record in the field.

The security holes Nisarga found last week now have an explanation. The system was built by a vendor that was specifically allowed to skip the security certification, the source code ownership, the data sovereignty, and the quality thresholds the original rules demanded.

Following things need to happen immediately;

1. An immediate CAG audit of the tender process.
2. A parliamentary debate on the topic.
3. An independent investigation into
> Why the first tender vanished?
> Why the disqualification clauses were deleted?
> Why the turnover bar was held exactly where it was?
> Why the security level was dropped?
> Why the blacklisting power was removed at the last moment?

Sarthak, this is genuinely exceptional investigative work. Far better than most journalists with full resources ever manage. Take a bow. :)

[Office Of Vijay Patel @VijayGajeraO]

Cockroach Janta Party and its founder are now using their foreign team to mass report to all those accounts that were involved in exposing their connection with AAP.

I can see a sudden drop in the reach of my tweets.

I request you all to retweet and comment as much as possible to restore my account's reach.

Har Har Mahadev🙏

[Praveen Chakravarty @pravchak]

wow, when was the last time the crowd roared for an Indian name on a Grand Slam singles court?

proud to see Nishesh Reddy @Nishesh05 knock out a top 10 player !

[Office Of Vijay Patel @VijayGajeraO]

Instagram is healing!

It is a little bit late, but Instagram is flooded with reels exposing the Cockroach Janta Party and Abhijit Dipke.

And most importantly, Indian Gen Z are doing it with facts.

They are now more aware of the propaganda of AAP.

[Adv.Vineet Jindal @vineetJindal19]

I don’t know why, but despite many efforts from me and others, Vedant did not come forward to share his paper to approach the court. I even messaged him in DM, but still received no reply. Some posts suggested that this account is fake as based in south asia.

[The Hawk Eye @thehawkeyex]

Body Language analysis:

1. Person who is trying to amplify presence, authority, seek attention, or emotional impact beyond what the actual conversation naturally carries.

2. Excessive hand gestures → Attempt to appear energetic, convincing, dominant.

3. Constant facial expressions / eyebrow movement → Seeking emotional reaction, attention, or validation from listeners.

4. Tilted lips / smirks after simple points → self-satisfaction, performative confidence, pretending smart, or pseudo intelligence.

5. Over-emphasis on ordinary facts →
Desire to sound insightful, Performative communication style, desperate to seek attention in group discussions, artificial

When the actual content is shallow, but delivery is highly theatrical, people often perceive it as:

- Overacting
- Pseudo-intellectual
- Attention-seeking
- Inexperienced

Authentic expressive people → gestures match substance and emotion naturally.

Performative expressive people → gestures feel disproportionate to the depth of content.

[Hit Janta party 🪳 @HCP_2026]

Educated Gen Z is with Modi Ji.

Uneducated Gen Z is with CJP.

Rt if you are agree 👍

[Bodhisattva🍁 @bodhi3attva]

Government block claim is misleading.

Technical checks show:

> Domain is on clientHold status
> Public DNS resolvers like Google (8.8.8.8) and Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) now return NXDOMAIN
> Website earlier resolved and returned HTTP 403 from active Hostinger infrastructure

This usually indicates registrar/hosting-side restriction, suspension, or intentional access denial not a typical ISP/government block.

If the government had blocked it directly, public DNS would usually still resolve the domain while access would fail at the ISP/network level through DNS poisoning, connection resets, or filtering.

The owner most likely did it himself.

[Sahil Kumar @sahil_kr_]

@abhijeet_dipke You removed the DNS of your website, took it offline and now playing victim card "typical cockroach behavior"

[Rahul Shivshankar @RShivshankar]

WHY INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES BELIEVE COCKROACH JANTA PARTY IS A FRONT FOR AN ALLEGED "CURATED DIGITAL INSURGENCY" AIMED AT ROUSING GEN-Z TO HIT THE STREETS.
• CJP reportedly amassed over 15 million Instagram followers within days this brought agencies to look closer.
• Agencies noticed multiple social media groups officially changing their names to “Cockroach Janta Party” on May 21, 2026.
• One such group’s history allegedly shows it earlier operated as “Aam Aadmi Party Gujarat” from September 2022 before rebranding as CJP.
• Records reportedly indicate the same page was originally created in February 2021 and underwent multiple identity changes over the years.
• Investigators believe the movement evolved from an apparent regional political fan ecosystem into a broader anti-establishment meme network.
• Security agencies fear the phenomenon represents an unstructured, youth-driven digital mobilisation vulnerable to foreign manipulation.
• Officials reportedly worry hostile actors could exploit the movement to spread divisive narratives and trigger unrest.
• Agencies are particularly concerned about the movement’s appeal among Gen Z audiences frustrated over unemployment, inflation and lack of opportunities.
• Intelligence inputs allegedly point to a significant chunk of engagement and followers originating from outside India, including Pakistan-based accounts.
• Authorities fear what began as satire and meme culture could spill into offline protests, campus agitations and coordinated street mobilisation.
• Agencies view viral anti-system meme ecosystems as potential threats to institutional trust and public stability if left unchecked.