R

most based

[R @ReadyLemon]

I am about to grind every facet of my being to become the most perfect and complete superhuman

[R @ReadyLemon]

@LikeAPhoenician @CantEverDie What on earth brings you to that conclusion? Was it when I said “good on you if you’re helping Palestinians”? Maybe it’s the pfp of the notoriously anti-genocide anime?

Did you just decide to ignore everything when typing that or what? Genuinely confused

[R @ReadyLemon]

@thatjackpot_ @brownsugaaaa3 Hotter take: We find everyone with this stupid ass “let’s fuck the new kids for fun” take and burn their bodies as a means of simultaneously controlling population levels, generating energy, AND cleansing the world of selfish stupidity.
You paid Elon $8 to say dumb shit
🫵😭

[R @ReadyLemon]

@satelittecastle @AfeefNess @mattxiv Bro said “bet” and u folded 😭😭😭 don’t talk big then act broke right after.

Probably wouldn’t even be fun sucking your tiny cock

[R @ReadyLemon]

@AngeBaddie Girl u got the challenge analysis wrong, got the millennial thing wrong, and then called me old after learning im a decade younger than you thought. You grasping at straws just to be a hater and 0 hot people care to do that.
It’s giving ugly and jaded 😭 I just know u down bad🫢

[R @ReadyLemon]

@AngeBaddie I’m 25

[R @ReadyLemon]

@mythical_meier @fandompulse A book requires nothing. You can ramble. You can cook up the most nonsensical bs and it’s still a book.

None of this rambling relates to the argued intelligence of the two either.

“No one but a fool pays Elon Musk 8 bucks to write prima facie on an app with a character limit”

[R @ReadyLemon]

@mythical_meier @fandompulse See how you used a bunch of words in a row to write this tweet?
A book is the same thing except you just keep going. There’s no “IQ must be this tall to keep writing” sign. Rowling is evidence that you can be a dunce and still cook up a popular story.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@FrankR2232 @terrancesveto This looks way less intentional than Rachel grabbing extra rice in 47 (which she won).

Next you’ll say every single person in the famous “attack zone” challenge should be eliminated and the winner crowned that episode.

Sub-0 survivor ball knowledge

[R @ReadyLemon]

@FrankR2232 @terrancesveto ��They let it go” yeah so actually they very much did not let it go.

Source: them not letting it go in the very next scene.

They actually made a very big deal about the fact that it was not let go.

They gave Big J the necklace. That’s not super “letting it go” of them.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@MikeBartner You could be the world’s number one Isles fan and STILL understand that McKenna landing on a team with Celebrini, Bedard, or the Panthers is objectively worse for everyone than it would be for the Rangers to get him. This list was made by an enemy of the entire NHL

[R @ReadyLemon]

@ivix42 @Bagaget @FlashShad0w If I run a rat maze I’m not using 8 chad healthy rats and 2 crippled rabid elders. That’s unnecessary outliers. I think chaos babies are a variable that should either be explicitly stated in the main problem or omitted entirely.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@ivix42 @Bagaget @FlashShad0w But everyone having equal info going in to the experiment is kinda how experiments work 🥺. That’s why researchers introduce blind and double blind elements. I’m not overwhelmingly set on red being definitively right I’m just advocating for scientific integrity 🫥.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@ivix42 @AlexKana4 @FlashShad0w Tbh, most versed in statistics will read “everyone” as “those capable of understanding and selecting autonomously” because uneven info distribution amongst participants makes a shitty invalid experiment.
It’s a matter of whether you default to reducing experimental bias or not.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@hyeiccino We really want to model the behavior of a population of individuals facing a real life or death situation with no external intervention.

Let’s use a 0 consequence twitter poll of people who have been discussing their answers for the past week!

Statistics has left the chat

[R @ReadyLemon]

@Big_lundi Nah, most versed in statistics will read “everyone” as “those capable of understanding and selecting autonomously” because uneven info distribution amongst participants makes a shitty invalid experiment.
It’s a matter of whether you default to reducing experimental bias or not.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@therurokenboy The buttons are weighted differently though. Sure, 50% is an expected value of random presses of 2 buttons with no stipulations, but introducing the idea that blue could result in your own death likely brings down its expected use rate. No one person can guarantee everyone lives

[R @ReadyLemon]

@MarxistRealism What benefit? They just decline the death gamble that everyone else is also allowed to decline. Nobody gets anything. Most red voters WANT blue to win and nobody to die, but in a scenario with no outside info, you rely on your trust or your survival instincts. That’s it.

[R @ReadyLemon]

@DaggerFoxVT We really want to model the behavior of a population of individuals facing a real life or death situation with no external intervention.

Let’s use a 0 consequence twitter poll of people who have been discussing their answers for the past week!

Statistics has left the chat