@nataliegargaro I am creating no issue that I see. I stated my beliefs about which party I believe was more likely to riot in the streets if they lost, and I am entitled to that opinion. If someone wants to create an issue about that,then that is their issue not mine.
@nataliegargaro No cities and business should have to fear their property and possessions being destroyed because a certain party doesn’t win ...was the point of my tweet
@nataliegargaro If you clearly look at what I posted in the context it was posted and look at the news it was about cities having to bored up store fronts in preparation for the election and the possibility of Trump winning.
@nataliegargaro Didn’t say that was right I’m just saying that doesn’t even compare with setting buildings on fire,fighting in the streets, breaking windows,and stealing from businesses
@chaelixox So I don’t see the point in complaining that “the amount was too low” people just needed to take the money and be greatful it was given instead of complain it wasn’t enough. If it really wasn’t enough for some there were places during the pandemic paying well for people to work.
@chaelixox I know plenty of lazy people who don’t work. I’m not saying every job pays fairly,but it’s about choices. The people who did need the 1200 got money to help and the people who lost their jobs got unemployment and made more than I did working 40 hours a week.
@chaelixox I do consider people who aren’t privileged let’s not even get into that. I just don’t stand for people who want to throw a pitty party and not get up and work.