The first Martian child will be:
•genetically human
•culturally alien
•legally undefined
•existentially necessary
What does ‘human’ even mean when environment diverges?
Australian politician: "We don't have the same freedom of speech laws they have in the United States and the reason for that is we want a multi-cultural country"
They are saying the quiet part out loud. Multiculturalism requires censorship because the whole project collapses the moment regular people are allowed to talk honestly about crime, borders, and national identity. The First Amendment is the firewall, once you lose it, you are just subjects.
@newstart_2024 Things that remain scarce:
•Land (especially desirable land)
•Status
•Political power
•Attention
•Control over systems
•Trust
Money doesn’t disappear just because goods are cheap.
It disappears only if allocation mechanisms disappear.
This set a terrifying precedent for parents everywhere. A Canadian father, Robert Hoogland, was thrown in prison for trying to prevent his 14-year-old daughter from undergoing permanent medical transition. After schools socially transitioned her behind his back and courts authorized testosterone injections against his wishes, the state stripped him of his parental rights. When he refused to remain silent about the medical risks and the loss of his child, the government moved to silence him by force. https://t.co/3kK4Jotk6n
Hoogland was sent to prison for "contempt of court" because he defied a gag order that forbade him from referring to his child as his "daughter" or using female pronouns. By treating his desperate plea to protect his child as a criminal act, the court signalled that the state, not the parent, owned the child.
This is nothing less than the criminalization of parenthood in the face of state-sponsored gender ideology.
What actually fixes this?
Not abolition.
Not denial.
Not “treat everyone the same” rhetoric.
The fix is precision:
•Defined consultation radii
•Evidence-based traditional use
•Tiered rights by impact
•Judicially bounded timelines
•Reciprocal obligations
GL
*The parallel system problem*
Canada operates under dual legitimacy frameworks.
This creates what political theorists call a “non-reciprocal legal order”.
And non-reciprocal systems always decay, because:
•Obligation flows one way
•Accountability flows the other
The shame is:
•No clear thresholds
•No geographic rigor
•No evidentiary burden proportional to impact
•No sunset clauses on asserted rights
Everything is open-ended, because open-endedness protects bureaucrats.
If microplastics are now considered a planetary boundary issue, then:
Why are we rapidly deploying large composite structures designed to shed synthetic material into high-wind, high-integrity ecosystems - without even monitoring for it?