Greg Bridges

Dad, husband, coach, mentor

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@DemocraticWins Thank God! I thought we were going to make sure only Americans vote in American elections for a second. That would literally change EVERYTHING.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@EdKrassen @grok Hey Ed, thanks for getting Grok to tell us that we need voter ID… Only a complete jackass would need AI to tell him that.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@ABC Thank you for this excellent investigative reporting ABC! China said it didn’t do anything… why keep looking? I heard that Iran said it has never oppressed its people and has never shouted Death to America. Their word should be good enough for you, right?

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@ABC Great investigative journalism.
Shout “NO!” Rather than reading the declassified docs. 👍

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@CBSNews So you’re saying you believe certain agencies but not the declassified documents from other agencies, right? Got it

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@GavinNewsom Is it true though?

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@krassenstein Why doesn’t she just give the Tongva people their land back?

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@krassenstein Yes. He opened the skies so your President could respectfully address the nation and then display the world record for fireworks. God is telling us all something Brian

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@EdKrassen She’s just Italian Ed. Lots of hand gestures, but probably said, “you’re doing what all of us in Europe will be doing regarding immigration very soon if we want to keep our jobs”

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@ClaireFosterPHD Omg you had me for a second. I didn’t realize this must be a parody account 🤣

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@AlexPadilla4CA You do remember that he was prosecuted as a candidate for president right? This is a real shocker.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@GavinNewsom Hope you can withstand the same level of Scrutiny now that the show is on the other foot big boy

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@JoshReynolds24 Can’t wait to watch it

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@krassenstein FYI- Europe is shifting to the right at a rapid pace.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@HarmonicLodge @ClintonIYH @FlashReport Exactly. Like I said, I do not know if they are actively cheating. But what I do know is that if I wanted to cheat or anyone wanted to cheat the rules that are in place now are exactly what you would do to be able to do so.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

The problem with your theory that they are “better” is that they have no ideas to move things in the right direction, and they have both failed to try to do so previously. If they don’t even have the right opinions/ideas, how will that end in proper actions? I’d take a flier on the guy who is at least saying the right things

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@ClintonIYH @FlashReport By “top two” you mean the fact that only the top two move on from the primary. Not that the top two rules for allowing or promoting cheating. Agreed.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

@krassenstein Grok it. Whether they are cheating every time or not (who knows) the rules they have created and continue to use raiding voting, are exactly what a party intent on cheating would and should do. That’s the bottom line.

[Greg Bridges @realGregBridges]

**Yes, under California’s current rules—designed and administered primarily by Democrats in long-term control of the legislature, Secretary of State’s office, and most county election administrations—many proven historical election fraud tactics remain feasible or exploitable with reduced immediate detection risk, especially in mail-in and harvesting processes. 
Feasible/Exploitable Tactics
Common methods from databases like Heritage Foundation cases and historical examples (absentee abuse, etc.) that align with CA’s setup:
• Ballot harvesting and chain-of-custody weaknesses: Legal with limited safeguards. Third parties can collect unlimited ballots; critics note weak documentation requirements, enabling potential tampering, coercion, or substitution before delivery. Late surges in harvested mail have occurred in past cycles. 
• Signature forgery or mismatched verification: Mail ballots rely on signature matching (human/scanner + curing). Self-policing by Dem-dominated officials, with liberal curing in some views, creates openings for forgery or improper acceptance. Public observers exist but critics say oversight is insufficient. 
• Ineligible voting via inflated rolls: No voter ID, same-day registration, and challenges maintaining accurate rolls (duplicates, inactive/deceased/non-citizens) allow potential false registrations or impersonation. Federal probes (US Attorney in LA) are auditing rolls amid resistance. 
• Delayed/opaque counting and post-deadline arrivals: Ballots postmarked by Election Day accepted up to 7 days later. Extended processing (signature checks, curing) under one-party administration enables allegations of selective handling or “adjustments.”
• Vote buying/coercion via harvesting: Paying for collection (not per-ballot) or pressuring voters fits within rules more easily than stricter states.
• False registrations/petitions: Documented in CA cases (e.g., fake signatures for initiatives).
These match tactics used in past proven fraud (small-scale per Heritage: dozens in CA over years, mostly local/individual convictions for false reg, double voting, harvesting abuse).