VirtualOwl

75% Alien

[Matty McTech @setupspawn]

Did you know your computer could do this?

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@higgsfield So, how many hundreds of credits will this cost me to put on youtube to then get 8 views?

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@gazetory He will get shot one day.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

If you have ever watched a dog eat from its bowl, you can understand the position some men take on the matter. He wants what is in his bowl, and he does not intend to share it. Any sign that someone might take even one morsel is met with growls, hard stares, and a level of possessiveness you do not usually see until something feels threatened. And once he has what he believes is his, he often stops caring about what anyone else has, or whether anyone else has enough at all. If a women then shows she is not his, she is not in his bowl and never was.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

Are you asking Black people as a whole, or are you asking a Black person? There is a difference. Black people in America are not a single mind with one shared opinion. Blacks have different experiences, politics, histories, beliefs, and ways of seeing the world. So before asking the question, it may be worth asking yourself whether you are seeking real understanding or reducing an entire people into one convenient answer.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

Wrong again, MacGyver.
Robots still have several dimensions to cross before they can do everything a human does, especially without possessing anything close to human understanding. Human intelligence is not just physical action plus computation. It is shaped by embodied cognition, biological memory, unconscious pattern recognition, emotional signaling, social resonance, environmental feedback, and millions of years of adaptation happening below conscious control.

There are invisible communications taking place between human minds, biosystems, frequencies, behavioral patterns, and ecosystems that machines do not yet understand because humans barely understand them ourselves. So while people may consciously feel like they are being replaced, something deeper is happening. Humans are being relieved from roles we were never meant to occupy forever. Repetition, labor, and mechanical execution are posts we were designed to outgrow.

That is where imagination takes over. AI and robotics will not end human purpose. They will extend human vision into a future we have never seen, but can now begin to manage through creativity, innovation, and higher-order thinking. AI and robots are learning to become what they think humans are. The problem is that humans have not yet fully discovered what humans are.

So machines are learning from an unfinished version of us, while humanity is still evolving toward a more complete integration of mind, body, imagination, ecosystem, and energy through its own metamorphosis.

The way forward is not to fear the machine. It is to give humans better tools, starting with education. From childhood development to industrial organization, we need systems that train attention, imagination, emotional intelligence, biological awareness, and creative problem-solving. Teach humans at every level to teach themselves in a new way of thinking.

Frameworks like Attention First point toward that shift:
https://t.co/3WnFBJXS51
So while robots and AI move on one side of the fulcrum, humans must move on the other.
Technology and humanity are the yin and yang of existence.

It has always been this way...
And it always will be...

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@MEM00063 @PeterDiamandis I fit every category, especially the one that could change an entire industry, but the business end would not be so simple as it is tranformaing education in the classroom. Oh, well.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

Wrong again, MacGyver. You can detatch a system from the web and run the game with physical... The software can't decide not to run it, it is basically automated systems in there just like a computer... If you dont update, the old stuff stays teh same. Whats wrong with everybody? Nothing, what's wrong with you?

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@RadioGenoa Can't put your hand on someone hoping they don't hit you back

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@rickyberwick This guy is funny. He actually should do more like this.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@LoriShemek @Bannons_WarRoom I hope this is a fact that manifests in real action.

[𝙊𝙠𝙞𝙠𝙞𝙤𝙡𝙖💮 @Burhss]

Never in my life have I seen a snake being bullied 😭😂

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

@NEWSMAX Lol. Why? According to the Supreme Court of the land, American citizenship is cheap and readily available to anyone and everyone, including enemies of the country.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

People tend to forget that when reading any text, especially the Constitution, it is important to put it into context first. We can take any text, rip it out of context, and make it say something else entirely. So the 14th Amendment was explicit enough. They just didn’t think citizens would be ridiculous enough to put people on the Supreme Court whose sole purpose was to pull the Constitution out of context, squint at it like a bad receipt, and read it as if James Madison had just posted it on Twitter yesterday.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

We say we want honesty, but we often punish people the moment they give it to us. When a man is direct about desire, he gets called a creep. When he hides it, he gets called dishonest or “not a real man.” That contradiction creates a culture where people learn to perform instead of speak plainly.
I would rather someone say the uncomfortable truth upfront: “I’m a man, and for a long-term relationship to work, my sexual needs have to be part of the conversation. If they are ignored, we are both wasting time pretending this relationship is something it is not.”
The same goes the other way. A woman should be able to say, “I care about you, but I’m not sure I see you as my long-term future,” or “I may only be here until my life changes and I meet someone more aligned with where I’m going.” It may hurt, but at least it gives the other person the dignity of making an informed choice.

The real problem is that people claim they want transparency, but when someone is brave enough to be transparent, they get recorded, mocked, and displayed like a social warning sign.

So what should he have done? Pretended? Lied? Played the long game? He was probably smart enough to fake emotional purity until he got what he wanted. He could have cheated while maintaining the image of commitment. He could have protected his reputation by deceiving her. Instead, he told the truth.And that matters. Because honesty is not always pretty. Sometimes it is awkward, blunt, selfish, or uncomfortable. But it is still more ethical than letting someone build decisions around a version of you that does not exist.
We cannot keep demanding honesty from people, then exile them the moment their honesty makes us uncomfortable. It is strange the the women posting this seems as if she would have perfered that he lied.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

Basically, he is saying that a narcissist can create the same uneasy reaction you get when you see a robot pretending to be human. It may look impressive, even convincing, but you can still sense that something is off. Beneath the surface, it feels like there are only gears mechanically imitating what humans produce naturally.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

This is useful context, but let’s be honest about the present moment: Democrats are not the ones holding power right now. Republicans control Congress, the White House, and much of the judicial landscape.
If they wanted to act, they could act. They could pass laws. They could challenge the rules. They could push amendments. But instead, they point to the system as an excuse while pretending they are powerless inside a system they helped build.
They appointed the justices. They shaped the courts. Trump played the Supreme Court game openly, choosing nominees for political reasons and selling it as strategy. He even said he was going to appoint a woman, which is the very kind of identity-based selection Republicans often criticize Democrats for. So no, this is not just “the Democrats.” Republicans own this too.
And while I agree the “party switch” argument is often oversimplified, we should also admit something else: the parties did not switch... They MERGED. In many ways, they merged around power.

The Democrats may have lost the Civil War, but the political establishment won the long game. And today, too many Republican reps act just like the Democrats they claim to oppose.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

Talking about the statistics is like hiring a pest control guy to get rid of bugs, and instead of spraying anything, he pockets your money, pulls out a PowerPoint, and says, “Technically, compared to all the bugs living underground, the bugs in your house are statistically insignificant.” Meanwhile, the cockroaches are in the kitchen splitting your rent.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

It’s simple: fear will not work this time. MAGA has been defending itself against enemy combatants, whether Democrats or Republicans are in office. Republicans were reelected because their base believed they would keep their promises. They will lose this time because they chose not to keep those promises. Democrats, on the other hand, will win elections because, whatever you may think of them, they keep their promises, good or bad. MAGA actually wants Democrats to go after Republican politicians because they feel it may be the only way those politicians are held accountable for taking their efforts and votes, then handing them over to the world instead of doing right by America.

[VirtualOwl @realVirtualOwl]

From the driver’s perspective, he saw a dog charging toward him at full speed. He knew how some people treat their dogs like children, so he assumed the owner would not reflect on the fact that he knows his dog has a tendency to charge at strangers. He also assumed the owner would be just as out of control and reckless as he allowed his dog to be.