Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5
We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge.
Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt.
Result:
Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game.
Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish.
Ranking based on DX & Features:
→ Grok 4.5: 9/10
→ Fable 5: 7.5/10
→ GPT 5.5: 7/10
Command Code is growing super fast, met the top five cloud teams in one day, all interested in getting us to use them for all the inference. 🔥
We have major capacity increment coming soon, along with a phenomenal optimization on tool calls, caching, and long thinking sessions.
We ran a test comparing GLM 5.2 vs Sonnet 5.
We used the same prompt, with /design in the command code.
The difference is big - effects, motion, and especially the footer. Sonnet 5 had nice hover effects, but didn't come close to GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 wins on quality and pricing.
Why pay more for almost the same level model?
GLM 5.2 is 9x cheaper than Sonnet 5 now.
GLM 5.2 will be 14x cheaper than Sonnet 5 in Sep.
For 1K requests, I did the math with Command Code.
It's $15 vs $138 now vs $208 later.
Open models are going to win!
@CommandCodeAI A lot of people prefer watching a video on this, I post a week or so ago, already 30K views.
Here you go, if you'd like a video version (cut from my livestream on this eng deep dive)
https://t.co/0wjcDfNtcs
GLM 5.2 is not a better model than any for frontend.
Combine it with /design in Command Code - and you get the best design workflow.
> GLM-5.2 (Max) ranks higher than Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking) on Code Arena, where Frontend coding tasks are being voted on by the community.