@redrockblueman@Pippoidal@DanteB35353@ShitpostRock@MoronMining That’s not what I said though lol, we know they are wrong because we saw how as a society they didn’t benefit from it.
Many Christian’s used the Bible as a justification for witch burnings, religion didn’t change that.
@redrockblueman@Pippoidal@DanteB35353@ShitpostRock@MoronMining That’s not what I said though, human rights aren’t based on what’s popular or legal. They are based on our collective lived human experiences over centuries. We know as a society we don’t benefit from rape or murder.
@redrockblueman@Pippoidal@DanteB35353@ShitpostRock@MoronMining Voted on when they were decided on yes, but we wouldn’t take them away because they’re an accepted evolution of our society.
Many more argue that humanity should function so the world doesn’t get destroyed.
@redrockblueman@Pippoidal@DanteB35353@ShitpostRock@MoronMining What are you talking about? I gave you the reason, we recognise bodily autonomy as a human right, and violating that right is bad.
Do you know anyone who argues nanjing was morally good?
@redrockblueman@Pippoidal@DanteB35353@ShitpostRock@MoronMining Yes, because the person being raped does not consent to it. We recognise bodily autonomy as a human right. We do not need God to know this.
They are distinct to theists because it’s convenient for humans to be the only ones with morals.
@Pippoidal@DanteB35353@ShitpostRock@MoronMining Moral answers can be literally whatever “I’m against sex with animals because I don’t believe they consent” “I’m against sex with dead animals because they could have been someone’s pet” this isn’t an own lol. You can just pick one, and then not do it anyways because it’s gross.